2016 Postmortem

global1

(25,225 posts) Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:47 AM Mar 2016

The Arizona Secretary Of State's Website Is Still Only Showing That 90% Of The Precincts Have......

reported. It hasn't been updated all morning. What is going on there?

Here's a link to this website: http://apps.azsos.gov/election/2016/PPE/Results/PPE2016Results.htm#

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Arizona Secretary Of State's Website Is Still Only Showing That 90% Of The Precincts Have...... (Original Post) global1 Mar 2016 OP

It took several days for all the Missouri ballots to be counted. MoonRiver Mar 2016 #1

You don't know that! bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #5

That is all the mail-in ballots and provisional ballots. Coventina Mar 2016 #2

Interesting but there is something there that is even more jwirr Mar 2016 #3

We know. Everybody knows NowSam Mar 2016 #4

Oh it's rigged ......I can definitely bring myself to say it! bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #7

Good. Hope many voices ring out NowSam Mar 2016 #8

AP has 99% reporting. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #6

How Did AP Get 99% Reporting When The State's Own Secretary Of State Is Still Reporting.... global1 Mar 2016 #9

I have no idea. They are usually considered the gold standard. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #11

Arizona: the land competence forgot. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #10

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)

1. It took several days for all the Missouri ballots to be counted.

Reply to global1 (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:49 AM

Mar 2016

I agree that states should get on top of this ballot counting issue, but nothing nefarious here.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)

5. You don't know that!

Reply to MoonRiver (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:54 AM

Mar 2016

Coventina

(27,064 posts)

2. That is all the mail-in ballots and provisional ballots.

Reply to global1 (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:51 AM

Mar 2016

Lots of people drop off their mail-in ballots on election day. It takes a while to count those.
Depending on the number, sometimes more than a week.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)

3. Interesting but there is something there that is even more

Reply to global1 (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:52 AM

Mar 2016

interesting. Jill Stein of the Green Party was getting enough votes to get some delegates. I saw her on a video talking about using her votes at the Convention to add to another candidates votes. Bernie would most likely benefit from that.

This is a common practice at the Conventions for parties with similar leanings to combine their votes in order to win for the best candidate. Or at least I seem to remember that happening.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)

4. We know. Everybody knows

Reply to global1 (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:52 AM

Mar 2016

Just like Iowa and Nevada and Massachusetts. This is rigged and we all know it. Even those few that actually follow her. People just can't bring themselves to vocalize it. This ain't the will of the people.