Hillary had a good night

First, she won the overall popular vote by 252,352 to 231,758--she has gotten more votes than any other candidate running for president.

Second, While she lost the caucuses in Utah and Idaho overwhelmingly--she still won a landslide victory in Arizona, a primary state where four times as many voters participated than in Utah and Idaho (between the caucus states around 90,000 participated compared to over 400,000 in the Democratic primary in Arizona). She did this having only appeared in Arizona for one rally (Sanders barnstormed the state and held a few of his epic rallies) and being outspent by the Sanders campaign on television/radio.

Third, While Sanders deserves credit for his big wins in Idaho and Wyoming--delegates are selected proporsionally, so even in losing HRC still nabbed delegates (as did Sanders in Arizona).

Next, If HRC has problems will younger voters then it's fair to say that Sanders has a problem with minority voters. This was demonstrated in almost every primary and caucus where there has been a significant minority population up to last night. Utah & Idaho are overwhelmingly caucasian. Arizona is a much more diverse state. There is a significant Native American and Latino/Hispanic population in Arizona. In counties with the largest concentration of Native Americans and Latinos Clinton ran well above her state totals.

Finally, looking ahead, Sanders does better in open contests rather than closed--particularly caucuses. The next few weeks I believe he will win several of them, but even so HRC will continue to accumulate delegates and then in mid-April the contests swing back in her direction with several "closed" primaries in big delegate states like New York (247 delegates), Pennsylvania (189 delegates), Maryland (95 delegates), and smaller states like Connecticut (55 delegates), Delaware (21 delegates) and Rhode Island (24 delegates).