This is fantastic news for Sanders.

You may be pretty close to the actual result with that!

Nailed it!



http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865650529/Cruz-Sanders-top-picks-in-Tuesdays-Utah-caucuses-poll-says.html

Bernie Sanders can be the president of Utah.



That's as close as the Vermont independent will come to being president of anything.

Some people puzzle me... X insults Y, what does X expect Y to do?

Do they expect Y to say to himself or herself that they are a pinata or a punching bag?

Will be Queen of cell block A or otherwise known as "Inmate 98533275"

...he/she declared Bernie wouldn't win a single state about five months ago. I take what he/she says and put it right in the circular file.

The Utah caucus was open to independents and other non-Democrats who were not polled.

My guess is/was 55-45 running up a huge Margin in Dane County.

Though maybe I'm overestimating his support in Milwaukee County, where there is a good amount of African Americans.

And I laughed at that poll.

I don't buy this one, though he definitely won't do what he needs.

I don't know why folks think HRC won't do well in NY...Closed primary...Very Diverse electorate... She was a popular senator...

And those numbers seem right. I just don't see her winning NY like she did SC.

CT is a push and she's a -8 favorite in CA., just my opinion.

I only did the bigger states...


Well, DE is not big !!!

She won Florida and Texas by that amount? So why not New York?

Wisconsin is Open. So with Independents, It puts Bernie as winning.

Milwaukee County could give her a narrow win statewide.

So, are we to expect the same thing happening with polls closing up despite extended hours? Polls closing after hours of waiting without ballots showing up? Hours and hours throughout the day without ballots? The in one county the judge orders voting on Monday because it was so bad, the the AG gets involved and argues against it to "maintain election integrity"? Because that is was happened in IL. And it was a 2pt win

She is doing better in the rural areas in WI than in other states, according to the polls.

GOTV.

Clenis Interruptus?

Full room fever?

Wolves?

Aside from one exception, all polls in WI so far have shown a Hillary lead - generally a bigger one than this. If this poll shows anything (and that is a big if), it is that her lead has been gradually shrinking. And given the disparity between polls and actual results throughout this primary season, it doesn't tell us much more than that (ie what the result of the actual primary will be).

The OP shows a 6 point Clinton advantage when Nate is citing an advantage of over 20 points. What has been said is that it was deeply in Hillary's pocket. It is not so deeply ensconced it seems.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/michigan-democratic/

Does that mean I am doing something right?

Unfortunately, with over 1200 individuals on "ignore", I get to avoid most of the rude and ugly comments and replies.

Case-in-point: At present, there are 36 replies to this OP, but I can only see 18 of them ... exactly half!

Putting individuals on ignore has its plus-sides and negative sides. I avoid seeing much of the hatred and attacks (good) but I also miss a lot of the unintentionally hilarious and absurd posts (bad).