Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:32 PM Mar 2016

Apparently Hillary isn't the only person the Bernie aggressively interrupts ...

... just ask Judy Woodruff. His performance during tonight's interview on PBS NewsHour was, well... let's just say that it was something. And I'll leave it at that.

The entire show will be online tomorrow (Thursday 3/24) at http://www.pbs.org/newshour/videos/ ... but maybe it will appear as a YouTube clip sooner.

Anyway, heads-up to the West Coast folks! Or, if you've got a Roku or AppleTV (or any other streaming box) complete episodes of NewsHour can be streamed for free with the PBS app.

236 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Apparently Hillary isn't the only person the Bernie aggressively interrupts ... (Original Post) NurseJackie Mar 2016 OP
Ya gotta give is SOMETHING! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #1
Bernie is a class act, its been a very long time since we've had a Presidential candidate Baobab Mar 2016 #38
He sure is a real person but he isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer either MinnieBlum Mar 2016 #94
So much for honesty. daleanime Mar 2016 #101
Yep! pandr32 Mar 2016 #206
He has shown much better judgment than the ones you name and is the best candidate for the 99 fourcents Mar 2016 #207
Assessing intelligence of anyone who reached the levels all three have is subjective karynnj Mar 2016 #231
I don't consider 8 years a very long time.. one_voice Mar 2016 #159
LOL wilt the stilt Mar 2016 #184
"Most thin-skinned campaign in history" whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #172
It was a perfectly reasonable discussion, elleng Mar 2016 #2
Oh no! We better support the pro-fracking, corporatist warhawk then. Broward Mar 2016 #3
Lets see: JaneyVee Mar 2016 #7
Let's see: you're supporting a right winger. Broward Mar 2016 #9
You mean the candidate ranked 9th most liberal senator is a rightwinger? JaneyVee Mar 2016 #11
When was she ranked 9th? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #12
When she was in the Senate. riversedge Mar 2016 #176
She wasn't 9th but nice try! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #177
Shreds my credibility in the eyes of a right winger? I'm ok with that. Broward Mar 2016 #13
This. I am so damn tired of the illusion of a "peace" Pres. That is not what his votes show. Nt seabeyond Mar 2016 #18
Really? What wars did he vote for? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #21
lol. That is sad BMUS. seabeyond Mar 2016 #22
When people can't back up their bullshit memes about Bernie? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #24
mmmm, when people define their comments for particular results, I do not bother. seabeyond Mar 2016 #25
Why? It should make it easier for you to clarify your statement. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #26
It simply doesn't matter anymore. The man lost. seabeyond Mar 2016 #28
The truth always matters. Like the fact that Hillary hasn't won yet. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #32
My point is the denial of truth. Arguing it is the point of doesn't matter, since he has lost. seabeyond Mar 2016 #34
Your post is a denial of truth, no one has lost before a winner has been declared. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #35
Nu uh. An yu hu. Clinton has won. Sanders cannot reach the numbers to win, so he has lost. seabeyond Mar 2016 #37
Word salad. Care to post a link to a source saying she's already won the nomination? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #42
This is not a pacifist. seabeyond Mar 2016 #36
Straw man, no one called him a pacifist. You should know better than to pull that crap beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #40
LOl. Not a strawman, Not digging. Dry and simple.... seabeyond Mar 2016 #46
Of course it's a strawman, you found "proof" that he wasn't a pacifist when no one made that claim. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #47
Of course it is not a strawman. seabeyond Mar 2016 #48
Let's check the defintion, shall we? What is a straw man argument? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #50
Sigh... we aren't done yet?.... seabeyond Mar 2016 #52
When are you going to address what I actually posted? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #53
You expected me to actually read it? seabeyond Mar 2016 #57
I had hoped that someone who made such outrageous claims would make an honest effort to back them up beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #60
See, you always stop me immediately from reading further. I posted his votes. Nothing outrageous. seabeyond Mar 2016 #62
You posted nothing but "proof" of your strawman, remember? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #66
I know. It is just performance art bravenak Mar 2016 #54
Speaking of performances, are you here to post more vile hate speech against Bernie? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #55
Not gracious, not gracious at all. Bravenak gave a heartfelt apology. And look what you do. seabeyond Mar 2016 #59
When you want to attack someone's credibility it's best you check your own first. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #64
No really, BMUS.... I am done even playing with you. That was beyond, acceptable. seabeyond Mar 2016 #67
I don't play so you were done before you started. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #70
Funny how you never have shit to say about racism against blacks. bravenak Mar 2016 #77
No one here is targeting you because you're a minority, you're getting called on your own bigotry. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #81
Who is contacting my relations BMUS? bravenak Mar 2016 #84
How would I know? Perhaps you should ask the people you claim posted your name. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #87
I need to know who did it first before I ask to ban anyone bravenak Mar 2016 #90
You said someone posted your name, surely you must know which posters did that. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #92
You saw it bravenak Mar 2016 #95
I saw that someone posted your name? If I had I would have alerted. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #97
I sent it to skinner bravenak Mar 2016 #98
And the person wasn't banned? I find that hard to believe. Prove it. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #100
Oh really? bravenak Mar 2016 #104
No I didn't, where are the links? Unless your full name is bravenak I saw no such thing. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #106
Every comment that links to KOS has my full fucking name bravenak Mar 2016 #108
So no one here actually posted your name, I didn't think so. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #111
That is posting my damn info bravenak Mar 2016 #113
No it's actually not, linking to other sites is not the same thing as posting personal information. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #115
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #118
Maybe you should ask the people at the other website since you said they have access to it. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #120
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #121
I never saw anyone link to personal information. Alert on them. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #126
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Mar 2016 #128
Noone has to list their name in their profile BMUS riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #166
Now that's interesting. Her stories keep changing, it's bizarre. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #168
Being a victim helps deflect from the anti-semitism. riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #169
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #173
It's so transparent melman Mar 2016 #174
The way she's complaining Live Bait Mar 2016 #235
I post at Kos and you dont have put your own name in your profile. Mine isn't riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #165
Exactly. i looked around at Kos a bit last night, and couldn't find ANYONE else there who gave their kath Mar 2016 #171
Here's a sample profile. Chitown Kev posts here and is prominent at Kos riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #175
Okay, so some do, but it's not the majority. So Bravenak lied when she said it was required there. kath Mar 2016 #179
Yup. I posted Kev's profile to support my assertion riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #181
Put it out there melman Mar 2016 #183
Oh geez, ok. And now she's trying to say BMUS did it riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #185
Bwahaha! - looks like she posted that here at right around the same time she was busted over kath Mar 2016 #199
YOU posted links to your blog there twice yourself and also had others polly7 Mar 2016 #222
THIS. kath Mar 2016 #229
It is not about my post. This is just harassment and targeted bullying. bravenak Mar 2016 #68
Only about harassment and bullying, you are right. Nt. seabeyond Mar 2016 #72
No, she didn't skepticscott Mar 2016 #211
This message was self-deleted by its author bravenak Mar 2016 #61
All BMUS is about is upsetting you. There is no other purpose here. You gave a sincere apology. seabeyond Mar 2016 #65
You are right bravenak Mar 2016 #69
Boy you got that right. Like pretending to support a candidate and admitting you don't. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #74
I do not have to fucking like the person I vote for bravenak Mar 2016 #79
No, BMUS is responding to ugly accusations and lies. polly7 Mar 2016 #223
I have no idea what you're going on about and it's irrelevant since I never posted your name. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #73
Who is it that is contacting my family about du? You seem to know every damn thing so tell me. bravenak Mar 2016 #80
Again I have no idea what you're going on about, perhaps you should take it up with the authorities. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #83
I have contacted authorities, BMUS. bravenak Mar 2016 #85
Sure you can tell them that a person named beam me up scottie posted a link once on DU. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #88
Yeah right bravenak Mar 2016 #91
By "alot" you're referring to knowing what you posted at Front Page Mag. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #93
I do not lie about my wrongs bravenak Mar 2016 #96
Who posted your name and info? When and where did this happen? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #99
It is allowed bravenak Mar 2016 #102
No it's really not, post the links and I'll alert on them. I'll even pm Skinner myself. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #103
My journal has my apology thread bravenak Mar 2016 #105
I read the thread, no one posted your name. If I'm wrong post the links and I'll apologize. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #107
Every comment tht links to kos has my full fucking info because kos does not allow fake bravenak Mar 2016 #109
So no one posted your name and information here, good to know. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #112
You CANNOT DELETE YOUR INFO bravenak Mar 2016 #114
Linking to other websites is not posting your information. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #117
If i link directly to your name and info, that's fine with you? bravenak Mar 2016 #119
Sure, go ahead. And I have no idea who's contacting your "people". beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #124
Let me know when you figure it out bravenak Mar 2016 #130
If someone is contacting your people it's absolutely wrong. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #131
Even linking to my info is a violation of our rules here bravenak Mar 2016 #137
You said they posted your full name over and over: beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #141
Posting to my account iINFO at another site is a violation BMUS bravenak Mar 2016 #145
I re-read that thread, no one posted your account info or even a link to it either. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #146
I just went back and re-read that thread, no one linked to your personal information either. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #144
They got MY FULL info from folks posting to shit from dkos bravenak Mar 2016 #147
So no one posted your full name or account info or even linked to your info. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #148
You are WRONG. Read the fucking TOS. JTFrog Mar 2016 #123
She said they posted her full name over and over again but that never happened. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #134
Actually it is in the TOS. JTFrog Mar 2016 #138
No one posted her name or linked to her info at another website. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #140
Well if you think someone lied you should alert admin. JTFrog Mar 2016 #142
Others can read the post for themselves. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #143
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Mar 2016 #132
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #125
Didn't I say it was against the rules to post personal information? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #127
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Mar 2016 #129
She is the only person who has ever posted her name here AgingAmerican Mar 2016 #232
Thats just not true @ Kos and profiles. You had to have deliberately put your name in riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #167
Yes. You do post there. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #214
So the fuck what?? nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #224
Continuing to post this brer cat Mar 2016 #155
Except she came into the thread to harass me. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #170
What a crock. brer cat Mar 2016 #213
+ a million. Like people can't read the damn thread and see who responded to who!!! Number23 Mar 2016 #220
This is one of the creepiest Bobbie Jo Mar 2016 #225
And it's been going on ever since bravenak changed her mind about Sanders Number23 Mar 2016 #234
Some people's definition of a "heartfelt apology" differs considerably from that of others. kath Mar 2016 #227
Another response to the apology that NAILED it is this one kath Mar 2016 #228
Creepy stalking. fun n serious Mar 2016 #189
Did you really Google someone else's name? Why? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #190
That is not how I read the comment. fun n serious Mar 2016 #192
How did I get that link? She posted a thread about it. More than one actually. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #193
She posted it here? fun n serious Mar 2016 #194
She posted those vile comments at a right wing hate site and fstdt added them to their list. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #195
I did not see hate speech. You're reaching. fun n serious Mar 2016 #201
It doesn't matter if YOU can't see the anti-Semitism, her comments made the fstdt list for a reason. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #204
Antisemitism and other bigotry is made up of perceptions Violet_Crumble Mar 2016 #221
This message was self-deleted by its author karynnj Mar 2016 #233
Bravenak posted the link herself to her real name. riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #198
Twice! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #200
Twice?! Even more hilarious. kath Mar 2016 #202
SMH. And she has the gall to try to blame you!! riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #203
Thank you. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #205
You know what they say... opiate69 Mar 2016 #209
LOL! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #210
Lol. Hey woman... good seeing you. Always. Nt seabeyond Mar 2016 #58
Hey, Lady! Glad this primary is over!nt bravenak Mar 2016 #63
Done... I am off to watch a show. Enough of this drama BMUS brings us. Nt seabeyond Mar 2016 #71
Fuck the haters, sea. JTFrog Mar 2016 #135
damn straight.... seabeyond Mar 2016 #139
Excellent rebuttal! vintx Mar 2016 #75
Thanks! But as you can see it's a wasted effort. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #78
Really? The truth matters? LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #216
You sure know how to get a rise out of folks!! hehe nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #180
and on and on and on and on it goes..... seabeyond Mar 2016 #212
Leave bravenak alone! Have never seen such nastiness! Am heading out to get ECT treatments so kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #236
Wait wut? "more war"? "Bernie introduced climate bills that only further regulated fracking" Only? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #19
More war? Do tell... revbones Mar 2016 #29
Hillary's husband is the single human being most associated with Baobab Mar 2016 #39
Lets see... JaneyVee Mar 2016 #45
Yeah, millennials weren't even born or out of diapers but their parents reaped the benefits. Jitter65 Mar 2016 #182
I didn't realize Hillary Clinton is a stand in for Bill's third term. n/t Matt_R Mar 2016 #218
So once the war Hillary voted for started dflprincess Mar 2016 #110
Damn those pesky facts again workinclasszero Mar 2016 #122
You should put facts in scare quotes when you reference it like that. AtheistCrusader Mar 2016 #156
Please give me an example of Bernie angstlessk Mar 2016 #4
Shhh....doesn't work that way....It's OK for the Hillster to interrupt... Raster Mar 2016 #5
Seriously? Right! Seeinghope Mar 2016 #6
Must. Not. Question. Meme. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #8
She had nothing to say. She just wanted him to stop talking. GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #30
Hillary is the picture of arrogance sometimes. Baobab Mar 2016 #41
That was after he had interrupted her many times earlier and in other debates. pnwmom Mar 2016 #151
He has no answer on most issues except his pet wall street-oligarch-bankster territory cosmicone Mar 2016 #10
You have to admit that in your sadoldgirl Mar 2016 #14
we all know bernie has won all the primaries...except where hillary cheated or GOT MORE votes nt msongs Mar 2016 #15
I would not say 'cheated', but irregularities...HELL YES angstlessk Mar 2016 #16
He has plenty of answers outside of the straitjacket of a campaign Armstead Mar 2016 #20
Hmmm, someone pointing out the problems (Bernie) revbones Mar 2016 #31
I bet the last time Hillary cooked anything for anybody was decades ago. Baobab Mar 2016 #43
For someone with a terrible message timmymoff Mar 2016 #49
Accusing people in that broad brush way of fraud treestar Mar 2016 #82
Never thought I'd see the day when people identifying themselves as progressive and Democrats, Loki Mar 2016 #217
LOFL!!! I come here to laugh... sigh uponit7771 Mar 2016 #89
Jeeze you think that was out of line? You need a hanky for your delicate sensibilities. Armstead Mar 2016 #17
Just re watched the interview voteearlyvoteoften Mar 2016 #23
Whats happened to Judy Woodruff? Baobab Mar 2016 #44
PBS Joins biased media! darts89199 Mar 2016 #133
Bernie made a comment about the PBS interview while he was talking to Cenk Karma13612 Mar 2016 #27
I'm getting real tired of the ankle biting 'round here. Ellipsis Mar 2016 #33
LOL! I said that one day and you wouldn't believe the flurry of ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #136
Hillary is the only one 840high Mar 2016 #51
LOL, ok. nt Logical Mar 2016 #56
why so scared? AgingAmerican Mar 2016 #76
Apparently, Bernie isn't the only one rudely interrupted by sHillary... AzDar Mar 2016 #86
He did something very similar when he was in North Minneapolis BainsBane Mar 2016 #116
She interrupted him, ffs, during a debate with time limits. He reminded her he had been speaking merrily Mar 2016 #149
Jackie.. I love you for posting this.. Cha Mar 2016 #150
troll bait... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #157
Not to mention saying things about their Puglover Mar 2016 #187
Great job by Bernie. Gave Judy's bullshit right back to her. Bernie rocks! ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #152
Nobody likes you. zigby Mar 2016 #153
Grow the fuck up if your going to post here. Ellipsis Mar 2016 #208
Complaining about bad manners is the liberals' version of the GOP's penis measuring contests Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #154
more troll bait from HRC supporters... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #158
LOL! Bobbie Jo Mar 2016 #160
yep... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #163
Look at you! Bobbie Jo Mar 2016 #164
"...the Bernie..."? Ken Burch Mar 2016 #161
Thanks for the video Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #162
Doesn't have the temperment to be President. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #178
Agreed. (That's a polite way to say it.) NurseJackie Mar 2016 #188
let's hear it for aggressive interruption AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #186
Hillary has interrupted UglyGreed Mar 2016 #191
The attempts to smear Bernie get more foolish and boring as the days pass. Vinca Mar 2016 #196
Bernie mentioned this on the Young Turks Enrique Mar 2016 #197
He fumbled that, badly. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #215
K & R SunSeeker Mar 2016 #219
I'm surprised at Judy Woodruff. thucythucy Mar 2016 #226
I have a problem with your embedded statement that Bernie interrupts Hillary karynnj Mar 2016 #230

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
38. Bernie is a class act, its been a very long time since we've had a Presidential candidate
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:33 PM
Mar 2016

as smart as him.

Not having seen the interview - I don't know. But I think we've all seen the gobbledegook journalists throw at him.

He's a real person, unlike some other politicians!

MinnieBlum

(38 posts)
94. He sure is a real person but he isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer either
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:42 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie's got nowhere near the intellect of Barack Obama, Hillary or Bill Clinton. He's a moderately smart guy who has been stuck in an intellectual rut since 1968.

 

fourcents

(107 posts)
207. He has shown much better judgment than the ones you name and is the best candidate for the 99
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:02 PM
Mar 2016

Senator Sanders has shown much better judgment than the ones you name and is the best candidate for the 99 percent. If you want candidates that are war hawks and will bankrupt our empire go with the ones you praise.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
231. Assessing intelligence of anyone who reached the levels all three have is subjective
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 11:59 AM
Mar 2016

In the first place, there is no real metric that could be used. It is not a measure of what they know on detailed subject matter. On any given subject, there will be many experts who could provide more accurate, more detailed facts. Even if weight is given for creativity and ability to innovate, a person's intelligence will not be uniform over all things. (Even at this level, I see HRC more as the student, who studies hard and gets the "A", not the student, who is less diligent, but creates something profoundly different and insightful. Put another way, it is the difference between intelligent and brilliant. )

In addition, it is really judgment, vision and the ability to put a diverse group of advisers together and to ask them the right questions. Then they need, what might be the most important ability - they need to weigh the various arguments and to then make a clear decision. An added plus, is the ability to continue getting information and reassessing results after a decision is implements and having the courage needed to change course when indicated. I think it was brilliant of Obama if he was the one to suggest that Dr Moniz and Secretary Kerry work closely together on the Iran deal - I have never seen a team like that before. In addition, it was brilliant to include Pope Francis as an ally on changing policy on Cuba and, as we learned recently, helping Columbia make peace with FARC. )

Another important trait, whether working with Congress and internationally, is diplomatic skill. Here, I mean having the ability to listen to people at odds with each other and to HEAR what they are saying and craft compromises that can get people to work together.

However, it is not intelligence, wisdom, temperament, or strength of character that are the top skills in getting elected - though all would be pluses. There is a whole different set of skills that could be called POLITICAL skills.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
159. I don't consider 8 years a very long time..
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 01:29 PM
Mar 2016





Bernie is a class act, its been a very long time since we've had a Presidential candidate

as smart as him.



 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
184. LOL
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:26 PM
Mar 2016

you have got to be kidding me. He's ok not even close to other presidential candidates like Clinton or ugh cruz.

elleng

(130,773 posts)
2. It was a perfectly reasonable discussion,
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:35 PM
Mar 2016

it's called GIVE and TAKE, and each of them did some giving and taking, and anyone listening could learn somethings.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
7. Lets see:
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:47 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie voted for more war and war funding than anyone running. Bernie bowed down to gun industry corporations and Lockheed Martin. Bernie introduced climate bills that only further regulated fracking but not ban it.

Oh, and he's also the only candidate running who voted to deregulate Wall Street.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
11. You mean the candidate ranked 9th most liberal senator is a rightwinger?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:52 PM
Mar 2016

You realize when you say ridiculous statements like that it shreds your credibility to pieces, right? But what do you care, youre not here for discussion.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
18. This. I am so damn tired of the illusion of a "peace" Pres. That is not what his votes show. Nt
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:07 PM
Mar 2016

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
21. Really? What wars did he vote for?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:10 PM
Mar 2016

He voted to go after Bin Laden in Afghanistan after he attacked us and then to intervene in a genocide in Bosnia.

You have a problem with those votes but not with Hillary's vote for Iraq?

Bernie believes that military intervention should be used as a last resort.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
26. Why? It should make it easier for you to clarify your statement.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:18 PM
Mar 2016

Instead of hiding behind implications that are based on internet memes such as 'Bernie voted for more wars/military spending/is just as much of a hawk as Hillary' etc.

If you really believe that you should be able to back it up with facts and not more memes.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
32. The truth always matters. Like the fact that Hillary hasn't won yet.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:23 PM
Mar 2016

Why do you want to spread disinformation and smears and when called on it post more disinfo as if that makes it alright?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
36. This is not a pacifist.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:27 PM
Mar 2016

Kosovo War, Afghanistan, Sanders supported only a gradual withdrawal from Iraq. Sanders supported the resolution that gave support to George W. Bush in both Iraq and in the larger war against terrorism. Sanders has supported Israel’s aggressive Middle East policies against Palestinian statehood. Sanders supported HR 282, the Iran Freedom Support Act, which was similar to the resolutions leading to the Iraq War. And Sanders has stated that he too would use drones.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
40. Straw man, no one called him a pacifist. You should know better than to pull that crap
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:39 PM
Mar 2016

Someone who sees war as a last resort and only agrees to use force when justifiable isn't a "pacifist".

Now let's get to the rest of your claims:

Kosovo War


He voted to intervene in a genocide in Bosnia, to prevent more ethnic cleansing, that is a justified use of military intervention. Or did you want us to let them continue the slaughter?


Afghanistan


He voted to go after the terrorists who attacked us and killed thousands of civilians on 9/11, that is a justified use of military force. Did you want us to do nothing?


Sanders supported only a gradual withdrawal from Iraq


Not a war, he voted against the war in Iraq because of the power vacuum it would create and after all hell broke loose (thanks to the people who voted for Bush's war like Hillary) Bernie agreed with Obama on the gradual withdrawal.


Sanders supported the resolution that gave support to George W. Bush in both Iraq and in the larger war against terrorism


Wrong, Bernie didn't support the Iraq war resolution and I already explained why use of force was justified in going after terrorists who attacked us on 9/11.


Sanders has supported Israel’s aggressive Middle East policies against Palestinian statehood.


Absolute bullshit, Bernie has always supported a two state solution and is an outspoken critic of Israel. And that's not a war.


Sanders supported HR 282, the Iran Freedom Support Act, which was similar to the resolutions leading to the Iraq War


Explain how was it similar to the Iraq war resolution and indicates a pro-war vote.


And Sanders has stated that he too would use drones.


When drones are used responsibly they don't result in civilian casualties and can prevent things like you know - more war.

Keep digging.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
47. Of course it's a strawman, you found "proof" that he wasn't a pacifist when no one made that claim.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:50 PM
Mar 2016

And I'm waiting for you to explain the rest of your post.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
50. Let's check the defintion, shall we? What is a straw man argument?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:56 PM
Mar 2016
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument which was not advanced by that opponent.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man


You posted:

This is not a pacifist.


Along with a list of things that prove he's not a pacifist.

giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument which was not advanced by that opponent

I never said he was a pacifist so you created a strawman instead of refuting what I actually posted.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
60. I had hoped that someone who made such outrageous claims would make an honest effort to back them up
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:14 PM
Mar 2016

But I'm used to being disappointed.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
62. See, you always stop me immediately from reading further. I posted his votes. Nothing outrageous.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:15 PM
Mar 2016

Cue in.... I stopped reading at outrageous. See how that works.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
66. You posted nothing but "proof" of your strawman, remember?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

If you can't back up your claims don't make them.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
54. I know. It is just performance art
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:03 PM
Mar 2016

Watch out! She has a gang of useless links to use to confuse the issue!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
55. Speaking of performances, are you here to post more vile hate speech against Bernie?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:07 PM
Mar 2016

After the anti-Semitic bile you posted at a right wing hate site you have no credibility.

I cannot stand him. His fans are racists who run around calling blacks racist and wonder why we hate him and them. I don't even LIKE Hillary but I will vote for her just so his fans can feel the sne BERN that they have been passing out.
Look at the racist comments here. I did not know jews hated us blacks so much. Good to know. I will return it in kind. There are so few of them It's a wonder they have the gall to think about being racist against blacks.

Bravenak, Frontpage Mag 8

http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=117360

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
64. When you want to attack someone's credibility it's best you check your own first.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

When a person repeatedly smears a member of a minority group and then is found to have prejudices against that minority group they should expect people to call them on it.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
77. Funny how you never have shit to say about racism against blacks.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:24 PM
Mar 2016

But I see you have no problem with the targeting of a minority woman with racist diatribes and bullying and stalking. Nothing to say about that. I see you piling on. Maybe you are the one who has the issues. I am accepting of my flaw and will seek out answers and forgiveness. You guys? Refuse to see yourselves for what you are and project your crap onto me. If one more of my relatives or friends are contacted I know where to direct the authorities to start looking. At those who keep posting my info in a targeted harassment campaign. This pile on and swarm harassment, doxing and stalking is disgusting and offensive.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
81. No one here is targeting you because you're a minority, you're getting called on your own bigotry.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:27 PM
Mar 2016

And I still don't know why you're bringing up something else that may or may not have happened when it's irrelevant to the discussion.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
84. Who is contacting my relations BMUS?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:30 PM
Mar 2016

Who is it that is going around to all of my social media account and leaving posts and contacting jy contacts, BMUS? This is disgusting and behaviour reminicent of night rides and reconstruction. And you just pile on and delight in it. How shameful for you. Bernie would be so proud. I should spam him with these links and the racist messages my people are getting.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
87. How would I know? Perhaps you should ask the people you claim posted your name.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:32 PM
Mar 2016

And I would report those incidents to Skinner, if they actually happened I'm sure he'll ban whoever did that.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
90. I need to know who did it first before I ask to ban anyone
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:36 PM
Mar 2016

I am not like those who will just jump on and start condemning. I think it is a group effort and I want you to just tell me who it is. That is way more fucking important than a fucking post or this damn primary. I want to know, NOW. Just tell me.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
92. You said someone posted your name, surely you must know which posters did that.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:38 PM
Mar 2016

Tell Skinner and I'm sure he'll ban them, no one should be posting persoanl information about others here.

Why don't you post links to the incidents here and I'll send it to him?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
95. You saw it
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:42 PM
Mar 2016

I sent it to him. Nothing. So I am goung to keep asking every damn body who participated to just tell the damn truth. I will let it go if you just tell me. Then you can bash me for fun uf you want to. But I want to know who it is. And you saw them posting my damn name. Stop acting brand new and tell me which one it is. I'll shut up. Just tell me. Nothing to fear. Just tell.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
97. I saw that someone posted your name? If I had I would have alerted.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:43 PM
Mar 2016

Post the link and I'll be happy to alert on it now.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
104. Oh really?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:55 PM
Mar 2016

You gonna pretend you did not see my full fucking name posted over and over by your buddies? Go look on my apology thread bmus. Unless u are just faking like proof matters. The proof is there. That's why I deleted the fucking thread. My name posted over and fucking over on it while I'm trying to make amends. Made me no longer feel so into it and just upset even more.

But you enjoy pretending that nothing is wrong with that disgusting pile on and posting of my fucking name and that you saw nothing. I am used to the see nothings. They always see nothing when racism against blacks happen but see everything wrong that a black person does. And they Wanna talk credibility.

Go look unless you are being dishonest about wanting proof. I think it is in my journal. Go look. Then you can alert them and tell me WHO

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
106. No I didn't, where are the links? Unless your full name is bravenak I saw no such thing.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:57 PM
Mar 2016

Post the links so we can take it to Skinner, there's no way he would allow people to do that here.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
108. Every comment that links to KOS has my full fucking name
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:03 PM
Mar 2016

Kos does not have privacy like du and linking to kos links to my full name. They know that if they are on kos. The messages started after they linked to my profile which left me open to harassment off site. This is why stalking and doxxing is prohibited in other places. You guys got so excited that you posted my fucking full name. Linked to my profile with my fucking info over nd over lije it was okay because I am so damn evil over one comment.

It is sad to see people mining the internet to troll for comment to take back to another site, and do not give one shit that they are distributing that persons private info over and over and over and over and over.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
111. So no one here actually posted your name, I didn't think so.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:06 PM
Mar 2016

You should contact the other website, I don't post there and haven't linked to that site so I wouldn't know about their policies.

But if anyone ever does post your name here you should alert on them and then pm Skinner, that's not allowed.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
113. That is posting my damn info
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:08 PM
Mar 2016

Linking to my FULL FUCKING NAME IS POSTING MY FULL FUCKING NAME. Fuck technicalities. It was pure wrong to link to my full fuckinb info. THAT IS POSTING IT.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
115. No it's actually not, linking to other sites is not the same thing as posting personal information.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:10 PM
Mar 2016

Maybe you should contact the other website.

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #115)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
120. Maybe you should ask the people at the other website since you said they have access to it.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:14 PM
Mar 2016

I don't post there so I have no idea what information is available.

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #115)

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #126)

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
166. Noone has to list their name in their profile BMUS
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:04 PM
Mar 2016

She did it deliberately.

I have posted at Kos for years and her profile is the only one ive ever seen where someone put up their real name. She actually starts her profile there proudly proclaiming her arrival.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
168. Now that's interesting. Her stories keep changing, it's bizarre.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:15 PM
Mar 2016

First she claimed that we posted her FULL name over and over again and that wasn't true. She said we posted her personal private information, also not true, and finally she claimed people posted a direct link to her name and personal info and that also turned out to be bullshit.

She accuses other posters of stalking her and/or posting info that allows other to do so when none of that ever happened.

Imo this is just a way to try to prevent people from discussing the vile hate speech she posted at a right wing site.

Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #169)

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
165. I post at Kos and you dont have put your own name in your profile. Mine isn't
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:00 PM
Mar 2016

You had to have done it yourself.

kath

(10,565 posts)
171. Exactly. i looked around at Kos a bit last night, and couldn't find ANYONE else there who gave their
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:23 PM
Mar 2016

own name. Perhaps there may be a narcissist or two, or known public figures who want to promote themseves, out there at Kos using their own names, but I didn't see any.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
175. Here's a sample profile. Chitown Kev posts here and is prominent at Kos
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:50 PM
Mar 2016
http://m.dailykos.com/user/Chitown%20Kev

Some folks like Steven Leser do use their real names in their profiles and/or as a username but most don't.

Bravenak put her own info out there.

kath

(10,565 posts)
179. Okay, so some do, but it's not the majority. So Bravenak lied when she said it was required there.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:57 PM
Mar 2016

She voluntarily put her own info out there (for what purpose?) and now it is coming back to bite her in the you-know-where.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
181. Yup. I posted Kev's profile to support my assertion
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:00 PM
Mar 2016

That Kos doesn't require anyone to post their real name on their profile.

And lol, I deliberately didn't link to my Kos profile page as I enjoy the fact nobody's cottoned on to who I am there.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
185. Oh geez, ok. And now she's trying to say BMUS did it
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:32 PM
Mar 2016

or was part of some grand conspiracy to out her real name and ID?

Pretty craptastic.

kath

(10,565 posts)
199. Bwahaha! - looks like she posted that here at right around the same time she was busted over
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:41 PM
Mar 2016

on Kos!
Posted here Mar 7 at at 4:52 pm DU time (eastern). Not sure what time she was outed at Kos, or what time zone shows on posts there, but I know it happened that evening.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
222. YOU posted links to your blog there twice yourself and also had others
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:00 AM
Mar 2016

bring your writings - with link - over here as OP's.

WTF are you going on about?

Registration there using your real name is optional - I'm there, I know. You can change or delete it at ANY TIME. YOU choose to have your name in your profile and you choose not to change it. This is some sick game, right?

You also hunted down personal information on a poster right here on this board you accused of not being black. Including a picture and news article. Did you forget about that?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=757635

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
68. It is not about my post. This is just harassment and targeted bullying.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

They searched far and wide for something to use.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
211. No, she didn't
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:48 PM
Mar 2016

she gave a phony one, a month after the post, only because her bigotry got exposed, and then retracted it, because not enough people were kissing her ass.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027698667

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #55)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
65. All BMUS is about is upsetting you. There is no other purpose here. You gave a sincere apology.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

That is good enough for most of us.

It will never be good enough for the few. Ignore them.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
79. I do not have to fucking like the person I vote for
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:25 PM
Mar 2016

This love jones for politicians is why people think it is okay to harass me offline.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
73. I have no idea what you're going on about and it's irrelevant since I never posted your name.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:20 PM
Mar 2016

You admitted to using hate speech against a minority group, that's on you.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
85. I have contacted authorities, BMUS.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:32 PM
Mar 2016

They told me to let them know if I have any more people I think might be behind it. I told them I will see who is still spamming that link and let them know to ask those people.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
88. Sure you can tell them that a person named beam me up scottie posted a link once on DU.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:34 PM
Mar 2016

I'm sure they'll get right on that.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
93. By "alot" you're referring to knowing what you posted at Front Page Mag.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:40 PM
Mar 2016

And the link was posted here last week so I think the majority of DUers are aware of it by now.

You even admitted to it.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
96. I do not lie about my wrongs
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:43 PM
Mar 2016

I apologized and you guys continued posting my name and info. Just tell me who you 'think' it is and I will shut up.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
99. Who posted your name and info? When and where did this happen?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:45 PM
Mar 2016

I cannot believe that admin wouldn't have banned someone for doing that.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
102. It is allowed
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:49 PM
Mar 2016

Many posted my full name over and over. Who knows who is contacting my contacts. Because swarming a woman and posting her real name over and over is okay if you think she is an evil black antisemite. Who did it? You know who. Go look ay my apology thread. It was posted as ops. It was posted on my threads. It was posted in the BS group, MY REAL FUCKING NAME OVER AND OVER. I wanna know who is behind the harassment of my contacts. Fuck that post and this primary, the candidates, any internecine bullshit. And I wanna know who is leaving the twitter comments related to this du bullshit too.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
103. No it's really not, post the links and I'll alert on them. I'll even pm Skinner myself.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:51 PM
Mar 2016

Anyone who posts personal information about a member should be banned and also called out and publicly shamed.

Post the links if it's true.

I'll start a thread to get others to petition Skinner for them to be banned.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
107. I read the thread, no one posted your name. If I'm wrong post the links and I'll apologize.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:59 PM
Mar 2016

Then I'll take it to Skinner.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
109. Every comment tht links to kos has my full fucking info because kos does not allow fake
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:04 PM
Mar 2016

profiles. It was my full fucking info. Over and over and over and over.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
112. So no one posted your name and information here, good to know.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:08 PM
Mar 2016

You should probably delete your info at the other website.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
117. Linking to other websites is not posting your information.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:12 PM
Mar 2016

I would inform the other website that you're being contacted and ask them to delete your account.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
119. If i link directly to your name and info, that's fine with you?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:13 PM
Mar 2016

Okay, cool.

Now. Tell me who is contacting my people

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
124. Sure, go ahead. And I have no idea who's contacting your "people".
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:17 PM
Mar 2016

If I were you I would delete my account and ask the authorities to keep checking into it.

Sounds like a serious offense, if you know it's members of this forum I would contact Skinner.


 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
130. Let me know when you figure it out
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:21 PM
Mar 2016

Because stalking and harassment is an ACTUAL crime. Unlike posting something horrible and regrettable on a message board. And none of my folks did anything to deserve none of this crap. It disturbs me when peopke become so self righteous that they start acting worse than the original offender. I have no problem apologizing when I do wrong. But I'm damned if it merits stalking and harassment offsite and offline.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
131. If someone is contacting your people it's absolutely wrong.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:23 PM
Mar 2016

Like I said, ask the other website to delete your account for a start.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
137. Even linking to my info is a violation of our rules here
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:33 PM
Mar 2016

Regardless of what you think of my credibility, you need to read the TOS. Then go alert on anyone who linked to my private info. Please read the TOS. Tell the culprits that they are in violation. Yes. I was wrong. But I also immediately admitted and never pretended it was not me, or that it was not wrong, or that I was not out of pocket for even responding to that purile racism against blacks on that thread.

But this pretense of no wrong doing by my accusers is dead wrong. And it was sad to see you participating. Even though we have issues. I had thought you were above that much. I have no idea why an apology is not enough and the need to punish me is so strong. But I have my opinions as to why that is. I look at therecs on the anti black threads. I find answers in the silence of allies and the participation of pile ons. I apologized a hundred times. Please explain why that is not enough for you, but no apology is expected by those anti black posters by you. Please explain.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
141. You said they posted your full name over and over:
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:37 PM
Mar 2016
bravenak

104. Oh really?

You gonna pretend you did not see my full fucking name posted over and over by your buddies? Go look on my apology thread bmus. Unless u are just faking like proof matters. The proof is there. That's why I deleted the fucking thread. My name posted over and fucking over on it while I'm trying to make amends. Made me no longer feel so into it and just upset even more.

But you enjoy pretending that nothing is wrong with that disgusting pile on and posting of my fucking name and that you saw nothing. I am used to the see nothings. They always see nothing when racism against blacks happen but see everything wrong that a black person does. And they Wanna talk credibility.

Go look unless you are being dishonest about wanting proof. I think it is in my journal. Go look. Then you can alert them and tell me WHO

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1564062


Why would you say that?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
146. I re-read that thread, no one posted your account info or even a link to it either.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:22 PM
Mar 2016

A link to another person's post at the other website was posted that's it.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
144. I just went back and re-read that thread, no one linked to your personal information either.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:53 PM
Mar 2016

Someone linked to another person's post at Daily Kos.

No private info was listed in that post.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
147. They got MY FULL info from folks posting to shit from dkos
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:23 PM
Mar 2016

Which has MY FULL NAME. I know EXACTLY WHY THEY DID THAT. This is the result. Now, why are you so cool with no apology needed for anti black racism?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
148. So no one posted your full name or account info or even linked to your info.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:26 PM
Mar 2016

Why did you make all of that up? Accusing other people of violating the TOS is pretty low. Are you trying to get someone banned?

And your friends here frequently link to your diaries, did they also violate the TOS?

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
123. You are WRONG. Read the fucking TOS.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:17 PM
Mar 2016
Do not post or link to any private/personal information about any person, even if it is publicly available elsewhere on the Internet.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
134. She said they posted her full name over and over again but that never happened.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:29 PM
Mar 2016
bravenak

104. Oh really?

You gonna pretend you did not see my full fucking name posted over and over by your buddies? Go look on my apology thread bmus. Unless u are just faking like proof matters. The proof is there. That's why I deleted the fucking thread. My name posted over and fucking over on it while I'm trying to make amends. Made me no longer feel so into it and just upset even more.

But you enjoy pretending that nothing is wrong with that disgusting pile on and posting of my fucking name and that you saw nothing. I am used to the see nothings. They always see nothing when racism against blacks happen but see everything wrong that a black person does. And they Wanna talk credibility.

Go look unless you are being dishonest about wanting proof. I think it is in my journal. Go look. Then you can alert them and tell me WHO

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1564062


And no one linked to her personal information either.

If you want people to stop linking to another website take it up with them, that's not against the TOS.
 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
138. Actually it is in the TOS.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:33 PM
Mar 2016

Anyone who thinks it's okay to link to any webpage that reveals another DUer's personal information can take their chances. And I hope they would be PPR'd post haste. Your warped interpretation isn't gonna save them.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
140. No one posted her name or linked to her info at another website.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:35 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 24, 2016, 02:21 AM - Edit history (1)

Someone linked to another person's post at the other website and it didn't contain any personal info. People link to her diaries all the time here, is that a violation of the TOS too?

Lying and accusing members of this board of posting personal info isn't okay either.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
142. Well if you think someone lied you should alert admin.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:39 PM
Mar 2016

Calling someone a liar isn't okay either.

But we all know you're just playing games. It's incredibly pathetic.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
143. Others can read the post for themselves.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:42 PM
Mar 2016

I didn't repeatedly accuse others of doing something that wasn't true.

Trying to get people banned for something that never happened is pretty fucking low.

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #117)

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #112)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
127. Didn't I say it was against the rules to post personal information?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:20 PM
Mar 2016

Show me where someone posted her info and I'll alert.

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #127)

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
232. She is the only person who has ever posted her name here
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:52 PM
Mar 2016

And now she endlessly broadcasts where anyone can go and see her supposed personal info on the internet, like an advertisement, then feigns outrage over it. It's pretty sad the lengths some will go to for attention IMHO.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
167. Thats just not true @ Kos and profiles. You had to have deliberately put your name in
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:06 PM
Mar 2016

I also post there.

brer cat

(24,525 posts)
155. Continuing to post this
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:33 AM
Mar 2016

after bravenak issued a heartfelt apology to DU is nothing more than harassment, and that goes to your credibility.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
170. Except she came into the thread to harass me.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:22 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:30 PM - Edit history (1)

Once you're caught being a an anti-Semite you lose the high ground.

brer cat

(24,525 posts)
213. What a crock.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:11 PM
Mar 2016

She responded to someone else...you posted this totally o.t. post to her first, so that b.s. won't fly. Playing the victim is not very effective communication.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
220. + a million. Like people can't read the damn thread and see who responded to who!!!
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:33 AM
Mar 2016

What the ever loving hell??? We see who said what to who in this thread.

This whole long subthread of hypocritical bullshit. That's all this is.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
234. And it's been going on ever since bravenak changed her mind about Sanders
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 05:01 PM
Mar 2016

Don't think for one second that ANY Of this is about anything else.

kath

(10,565 posts)
227. Some people's definition of a "heartfelt apology" differs considerably from that of others.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:45 AM
Mar 2016

For me, and quite a few others, the most spot-on part of the many posts in Bravenak's "apology" thread is this subthread, beginning with BlueNorthwest's absolutely dead on post 210, and continuing on to riderinthestorm's #278 http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027698667#post210
It contains some very good posts; well worth reading.

kath

(10,565 posts)
228. Another response to the apology that NAILED it is this one
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 11:13 AM
Mar 2016

by merrily, #268

Maybe Will Pitt posted POSUCS once and apologized for it. Search DU for that comment and see how many hundreds of times and how many years it was used not only against Will Pitt, but also against people who rec'd his threads or failed to attack him. No one just graciously accepted Will's apology and moved on. They drove him off the fucking board and then piled on after that. Same for MannyGoldstein and his gefilte fish post for which he apologized. Search gefilte fish and see how graciously and quickly people moved on after his apology.

It may take a lot of time for you to cull the hurtful posts of many DUers, but it would also take me a lot of time to cull just the hurtful posts and pms the OP has made all by her lonesome.


 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
189. Creepy stalking.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:08 PM
Mar 2016

I have never googled someone's user name. Never will. It's creepy. No different than a window peeper. Gross. Ewwww... Why?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
190. Did you really Google someone else's name? Why?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:12 PM
Mar 2016

Imo what's even more creepy is posting hate speech about a minority group.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
192. That is not how I read the comment.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:16 PM
Mar 2016

Everyone sees things different. How did you get it? Reminds me of a panty thief, this is all really disturbing. Keeping it like a " trophy." Ewww Just ewww

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
193. How did I get that link? She posted a thread about it. More than one actually.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:18 PM
Mar 2016

I guess that makes her the panty thief in your creepy scenario. And ewww, who thinks about stealing panties anyway? That's really perverted.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
194. She posted it here?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:24 PM
Mar 2016

It looks like it is on a different site. But if Sanders supporters have made her feel like jews hate blacks that is a real perception she has. I would too. Y'all can spin it how you wish. I promise you with all sincerity. It makes me physically sick to think people snap pictures of peoples posts, keep them, use them for some creepy sick purpose and dig online to see where a person posts. I'm not exaggerating. I feel completely repulsed right now.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
195. She posted those vile comments at a right wing hate site and fstdt added them to their list.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:29 PM
Mar 2016

That's the chance you take when you use hate speech against a minority group online, the takeaway should be don't be a bigot, not don't get caught and then blame the people who call out your bigotry.

But if Sanders supporters have made her feel like jews hate blacks that is a real perception she has. I would too. Y'all can spin it how you wish. I promise you with all sincerity. It makes me physically sick to think people snap pictures of peoples posts, keep them, use them for some creepy sick purpose and dig online to see where a person posts. I'm not exaggerating. I feel completely repulsed right now.


You're blaming us for her hate speech? Is it the Jews' fault too, for provoking her? I'm curious, when bigots post hate speech about minorities is it always someone else's fault?

Fstdt is known for calling out religious based bigotry, take it up with them. And take it up with the bigots who post hate speech to begin with, they're not the victims.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
204. It doesn't matter if YOU can't see the anti-Semitism, her comments made the fstdt list for a reason.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:50 PM
Mar 2016

Unless you believe they're part of some vast Bernie Bro internet conspiracy too?

I agree, using hate speech against a minority group after endlessly smearing a member of that minority group for months is creepy.

I'm glad fstdt found her comments, it explains a great deal about her animosity towards Bernie.

Violet_Crumble

(35,956 posts)
221. Antisemitism and other bigotry is made up of perceptions
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:56 AM
Mar 2016

And I bet to the antisemites who blame Jews for their own misfortunes and claim things like Jews control the media or the US government, they'd insist they're real perceptions. uh, okay. The thing is that what's a real perception to them is still ugly and skin crawling antisemitism. And anyone who singles out Jews and blames them for things as though they're a group of single minded people who sit around and plot evil together is indisputably expressing antisemitism. There's no justification for it and if someone were to be genuinely remorseful for the ugliness they expressed, well they'd kind or least act a little bit sorry and not be squirming like a puppy with its head caught in the kitchen trash bin trying to blame everyone and everything else for what they said.

As for something from kos being reposted here. Big fucking whoop. That's done a lot and always has been. The internets a connected kind of place and nothing anyone says on a public forum is private. I dunno, if you disagree I guess you could try and get Google and other search engines banished or better still have the rest of the Internet removed so only DU remains.

Response to fun n serious (Reply #194)

kath

(10,565 posts)
202. Twice?! Even more hilarious.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:45 PM
Mar 2016

And within a few hours of when she was being outed over at Daily Kos. (As I noted in post 199 this thread)

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
203. SMH. And she has the gall to try to blame you!!
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:46 PM
Mar 2016


Or to accuse you of knowing about some secret group that plotted to give up her real name.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
78. Thanks! But as you can see it's a wasted effort.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:25 PM
Mar 2016

I do it for the practice, it helps me when I deal with right wing idiots irl.

LiberalFighter

(50,795 posts)
216. Really? The truth matters?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:59 PM
Mar 2016

Apparently you don't like the truth when I posted in Bernie Sanders about the Arizona fiasco. And then you blocked me from posting in the group the first time I posted.

You can't have it both ways.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
236. Leave bravenak alone! Have never seen such nastiness! Am heading out to get ECT treatments so
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 05:32 PM
Mar 2016

I can purge this ugly exchange from my memory!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
19. Wait wut? "more war"? "Bernie introduced climate bills that only further regulated fracking" Only?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:08 PM
Mar 2016

What wars did he vote for?

And when did he vote against a bill that banned that banned fracking?

His vote to "further" regulate and intent to ban fracking certainly beats how Hillary sold it to the world:

http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
39. Hillary's husband is the single human being most associated with
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:38 PM
Mar 2016

neoliberalism, which makes deregulation and privatization into something with the aggressive fervor of a religion.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
45. Lets see...
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:47 PM
Mar 2016

Bill Clinton created 25 million jobs. Longest stretch of peacetime in US history. Lowest black unemployment rate in US history. Nominated the 2 most liberal justices in US history. Expanded manufacturing. Raised taxes on the rich. And handed over a budget surplus.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
182. Yeah, millennials weren't even born or out of diapers but their parents reaped the benefits.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:02 PM
Mar 2016

Now under the bus with him for making life better or so many.

dflprincess

(28,072 posts)
110. So once the war Hillary voted for started
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:04 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie voted for funds so the troops would hopefully have the equipment and supplies they needed.

You're okay with Hillary sending other people's kids to die for the sake of her political career and proving she's tough enough to be"Commander-in-Chief" but you're not okay with Bernie voting for funds that might help get those troops home safely

Do I have that right?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
122. Damn those pesky facts again
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:16 PM
Mar 2016

JaneyVee!

They just don't fit the narrative being sold around here, so Bernie fans look the other way.

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
4. Please give me an example of Bernie
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:36 PM
Mar 2016

aggressively interrupting Hillary?

From my memory, he aggressively stopped her from interrupting him!

Raster

(20,998 posts)
5. Shhh....doesn't work that way....It's OK for the Hillster to interrupt...
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:42 PM
Mar 2016

...it's not OK for anyone to call her on it. You know, her turn and all that...

 

Seeinghope

(786 posts)
6. Seriously? Right!
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016

She would interrupt and then at times ramble on just to eat up the clock. The debates were handled poorly and slanted against Bernie Sanders.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
30. She had nothing to say. She just wanted him to stop talking.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:21 PM
Mar 2016

If you watch that clip again, she just interrupts him with "You know..." and then she pauses. So she doesn't even have a specific thing to say at that point she just wants to stop Bernie from talking or perhaps she is trying to get under his skin. And I love her self-satisfied "I will" in this.



I compare that to Obama's response. Similar use of the raised finger and smile, then he waits and speaks. I think the biggest difference between these two clips is the way CLINTON acts. She is almost childish with Sanders, she was more poised with Obama.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
41. Hillary is the picture of arrogance sometimes.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:40 PM
Mar 2016

When she gets that way, Bernie if anything is too polite to her.

She constantly interrupts him.

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
151. That was after he had interrupted her many times earlier and in other debates.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 01:52 AM
Mar 2016

He specializes in practically jumping out of his skin, waving his hand around to indicate he wants to respond -- even though he's the only other person on the stage and will certainly get his turn.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
10. He has no answer on most issues except his pet wall street-oligarch-bankster territory
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:50 PM
Mar 2016

Whenever asked anything specific he starts yelling and goes to his territory, talking over the person asking the question.

Q: What can you make from okra?

Hillary: Pickled Okra, ?Okra Creole, Fried Okra, Smashed Fried Okra, okra casserole, gumbo and depending upon the occasion, several Indian and Sri Lankan dishes.

Bernie: What people are angry about is that the top 1/10th of 1% have nearly as much wealth as the bottom 70%. We live in rigged economy and a rigged financial system where bankers and wall street are committing fraud, making the billionaires and millionaires richer.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
14. You have to admit that in your
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:59 PM
Mar 2016

presentation he brings up the important issues,
instead of dealing with irrelevancies.

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
16. I would not say 'cheated', but irregularities...HELL YES
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:03 PM
Mar 2016

It seems the states with the MOST delegates, that Bernie may do well in, Bill shows up, and irregularities occur?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
20. He has plenty of answers outside of the straitjacket of a campaign
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:09 PM
Mar 2016

Yes he is trying to stay on his message (and I wish he'd go a little off message more often).

But in a situation where there's actual time and real give and take, he has a very comprehensive understanding of a wide range of specific issues and potential solutions.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
31. Hmmm, someone pointing out the problems (Bernie)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:22 PM
Mar 2016

vs. part of the problem (Hillary).

I'll take the guy trying to point out that the building is on fire over the person telling the fire to "Cut it out" any day of the week.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
43. I bet the last time Hillary cooked anything for anybody was decades ago.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:44 PM
Mar 2016

Maybe when Bill was campaigning for governor of Arkansas.

People like her likely have a person on their staff to come up with folksy things to insert into her choreographed routines.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
49. For someone with a terrible message
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:52 PM
Mar 2016

you sure got duped when she "evolved" with half his platform, but never fear, she will lurch back to the right like the Goldwater girl she has shown us to be.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
217. Never thought I'd see the day when people identifying themselves as progressive and Democrats,
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 10:51 PM
Mar 2016

would stoop to Karl Rove tactics. Not a proud moment at all. It really does separate me from this Bernie Sander's group on DU. Some of them are good people, but the rest, well I guess IOKIYABSSS.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
17. Jeeze you think that was out of line? You need a hanky for your delicate sensibilities.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:06 PM
Mar 2016

He responded quite calmly to being badgered with questions that were clearly baiting.

"But HOW will you stop terrorism today?"

Like anybody -- including President Obama and Clinton -- can promise a fool proof plan guaratntee of that.

I hear they have deals on fainting couches. You'd better stock up before the general election.

voteearlyvoteoften

(1,716 posts)
23. Just re watched the interview
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:12 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie gave his usual clear and pragmatic answers to her questions re Isis and terrorism in Europe. It was after she continued to repeat her questions re how to deal with terrorists in Europe he did get a bit testy with her. Because as he explained that there was no simple answer she pressed him for a simple answer. Judy get off my lawn!

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
44. Whats happened to Judy Woodruff?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:47 PM
Mar 2016

Her face has changed, now she looks angry and asks all the wrong questions.

darts89199

(1 post)
133. PBS Joins biased media!
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:26 PM
Mar 2016

You are so right! Woodruff asked about 5 of the same questions about how do you stop ISIS like Bernie would have some magic answer - when he already has detailed the response. Then she infers he can't win even though he just won two states by landslides and the overseas Dems votes in 2 days!! She should have asked about voter suppression in AZ, fraud in MA, income inequality, his amazing rise from 10 months ago, the FACT he's WON 11 states and Overseas and tied in 3 others. Come on PBS now you are one of the enemy too!

Karma13612

(4,544 posts)
27. Bernie made a comment about the PBS interview while he was talking to Cenk
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:18 PM
Mar 2016

on his TYT interview after.

Yea, I think Bernie was annoyed about the way the PBS interview was pushing him into a corner and getting him to answer 'gotcha' questions.

Not surprised considering PBS is in the tank for Hillary.

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)
136. LOL! I said that one day and you wouldn't believe the flurry of ...
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:32 PM
Mar 2016

lil nippers that came at me! But that's exactly what it is - not lethal but irritating as all get out!


 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
86. Apparently, Bernie isn't the only one rudely interrupted by sHillary...
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:32 PM
Mar 2016



Poor Hill... SUCH a victim.




merrily

(45,251 posts)
149. She interrupted him, ffs, during a debate with time limits. He reminded her he had been speaking
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:30 PM
Mar 2016

before SHE interrupted HIM.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
157. troll bait...
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 10:53 AM
Mar 2016

You do enjoy your troll bait don'cha?

Odd that HRC supporters champion all this troll baiting OPs and whatnot

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
154. Complaining about bad manners is the liberals' version of the GOP's penis measuring contests
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 02:54 AM
Mar 2016

No substance. We got cities drinking poison water, 2 million people in prison, 29 million people without health coverage, rising seas levels and the government is captured by wealthy special interests.

I couldn't care less who has bad manners.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
163. yep...
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 01:48 PM
Mar 2016

yeah, it took longer than usual for me, go figure... I'm usually a much quicker study

thx for the welcome!

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
186. let's hear it for aggressive interruption
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:32 PM
Mar 2016

we could stand to have a few things in DC aggressively interrupted, that's for sure!

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
196. The attempts to smear Bernie get more foolish and boring as the days pass.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:33 PM
Mar 2016

What's up for tomorrow? Do you have it on good authority Bernie pees in the shower?

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
197. Bernie mentioned this on the Young Turks
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 05:34 PM
Mar 2016

Cenk asked Bernie why he doesn't call the media on their bullshit, and he mentioned this PBS interview, where he had to fight to give serious answers. He said maybe I should do this more, maybe I should tell them to shut up for a minute.

I haven't seen the interview yet. I respect both Bernie and Judy Woodruff, so I'm not sure what to expect, but I predict I will think Bernie interrupted her for the right reasons.

thucythucy

(8,039 posts)
226. I'm surprised at Judy Woodruff.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:55 AM
Mar 2016

I watch the News Hour fairly often, and generally speaking the interviews are both informative and respectful. She did keep repeating basically the same question, only to get the same basic answer. Maybe it was because the Brussels attacks were so fresh. But not one of Ms. Woodruff's best interviews, IMHO.

At the same time, I thought Senator Sanders could have shown a tad less exasperation. As a candidate for president, and (perhaps, hopefully) president, he's going to have to put up with endless BS from the media, far more bothersome than this. On the other hand, I can't imagine how exhausting and exasperating a campaign like this must be. My hats off to both Democratic candidates for being willing and able to endure this endurance marathon.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
230. I have a problem with your embedded statement that Bernie interrupts Hillary
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 11:35 AM
Mar 2016

In fact, the most pointed to example by the Clinton supporters, actually has Bernie refusing to let HRC interrupt him when the moderator gave him time to respond. The fact was in that debate, HRC routinely spoke over both Bernie and the moderator (Anderson Cooper), ignoring the moderator's attempts to moderate. Bernie, in general, follows debate rules -- until it is clear that SHE is not doing so. HRC has used the fact that, as a woman, she is not seen as being aggressive when in fact, she is.

Your link does not even seem to go to anything involving Bernie Sanders - it is yesterday's News broadcast. However - having not seen what you refer to, Woodruff, is a reporter and like many reporters want to control an interview and to limit the time for responses. Had HRC done the same, you would be here posting that HRC won't let a reporter "put her in her place".

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Apparently Hillary isn't ...