2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum‘Ashamed’ of Trump, Harvard Republican Club won’t endorse top GOP nominee for first time since 1888
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/08/05/ashamed-of-trump-harvard-republican-club-wont-endorse-top-gop-nominee-for-first-time-since-1888/?client=safariAshamed of Trump, Harvard Republican Club wont endorse top GOP nominee for first time since 1888
By Valerie Strauss
August 5, 2016 at 9:43
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump holds baby cousins Evelyn Kate Keane, 6 months old, and Kellen Campbell, 3 months old, following his speech at the Gallogly Events Center at University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Friday, July 29, 2016 in Colorado Springs, Colo. (Stacie Scott/The Gazette via AP)
The Harvard Republican Club was founded in 1888, and is the oldest College Republican chapter in the country. Its website says the club exists to promote Republican principles, policies and candidates and members are proud of their rich history of Republican advocacy. At least, until Donald Trump won the 2016 Republican Partys presidential nomination.
The Harvard Republican Club has issued a statement (read in full below) saying that for the first time in its history, it will not endorse their partys presidential candidate. Why? Because the club is ashamed of Trump. He is, the statement says, a threat to the survival of the United States.
The Harvard Crimson, a student newspaper, reported that the club polled members this week to see who they were supporting for president. Ten percent said they would support Trump, while 80 percent said they would not. Another 10 percent were undecided.
...more...
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Young people are horrified, and rightfully, at the thought of a tRump presidency.
NNadir
(33,513 posts)...stronger, not weaker. They help us to test our theoretical ideas before they are enacted by creating a debate.
I am troubled, in this sense, about the collapse of the Republican party. One hopes that a new opposition to us will arise. Perhaps it will be the Libertarian party. I have no use for libertarianism per se - holding the opinion that anyone who reads Ayn Rand after his or her pimples have cleared needs to get a life - but I do think that Gary Johnson is sane, whereas Trump and much of the Republican leadership is not.
These Harvard folks are OK with me. I disagree strongly with them, but they are sane, and living in the real world. Good luck to them in restoring the Republican party to sanity, should that prove possible.
OnDoutside
(19,954 posts)massive task. That said, Evangelicals voted overwhelmingly for a racist bigot with the morality of a rat, rather than Ted Cruz, so perhaps they will be more open to a moderate Republican ?
NNadir
(33,513 posts)...it for years, Nixon's "Southern Strategy," Reagan's "Welfare Queens," George H.W. Bush's "Willie Horton," Dimson's penchant for executions in Texas.
Trump is the logical conclusion but I have to believe that there are some Republicans who regret creating this monster.
I do not agree with the "deregulate" and "Laissez-faire" "small government" stuff they put out, but that at least is an honest disagreement.
What they have going now is pure fascism, which will hopefully kick some sense into them or at least to any honest successors to the Republican Party, should it die a deserved death.
TheOther95Percent
(1,035 posts)Republicons in office are too afraid to antagonize Trump voters so most have endorsed the Loudmouth Yam or remained silent.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)The other doesn't look as if she (?) is paying any attention whatsoever to the jackass
Babies are good judges of character