They could put it into a holding pattern, or they could nominate a group of people, a board of directors, to oversee the foundation for the next eight years. The fiscal/budgetary end of it all needs to be like Caesar's Wife, above reproach, but there's no reason the good works this foundation has done should cease.

After all, they aren't getting any younger, it would probably be a good idea to start thinking in those terms anyway. They've created a very different way of shoveling "aid" to people, by employing them to make their own change, rather than giving them that one-time handout, and that paradigm is a good legacy.

Maybe they could rename it, too, if they felt that would be a distraction, but the infrastructure that organization has built should not be flushed.

Bill and Hillary from all duties and associations. Zero interaction.

"why wasn't it disbanded when she was Secretary of State? ..."

The Republicans will bring it up plenty.

Dems "Good question. I'm not sure. Need to give it some thought" ...

Shutup Ed! We've been having a good string of news cycles

Besides, all those efforts to bring clean renewable power to poor communities must be stopped asap. How dare the Clinton Foundation not work to the enrichment of the oil companies, like Halliburton, BP and Exxon. Did Rendell ask for those companies be shut down during the Bush years? What a vile tool.

He sure has no political courage. The Clinton Foundation gets high marks from independent charity rating agencies. Take anyone whose name is Clinton off the board for the duration of the Clinton Presidency but it is not right to shut is down just because many attack it for partisan purposes.

He is a terrible spokesperson for Democrats.

It's ok to drop a bomb on women and children as long as they're black, in his book.

countries/people the Foundation is helping.

The other day Eddie was on tv and clearly does not yet know that none of the emails were marked classified in the heading because he kept saying that only three were properly marked. He is a stupid fool.

I don't understand why Rendell is suggesting this at all.

Of organizations that benefit the poor.

No one insisted wealthy presidents sell all f heir assets when elected.

...if he is elected president.

Or even demand that Trump draw up plans for doing so.

I didn't think so.

We don't need another LBJ fearing how the Republicans would spin a pull-out of Vietnam. His phone calls showed that fear of GOP backlash played far too much of a role in his decisions about it.

He needs to be in a straight-jacket.