2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIgnore the LA Times Poll that Has Trump up 45-43
The LA Times polls have been outliers throughout this whole cycle. While the LA Times poll has Trump +2, four other recent polls have Clinton +5, +6, +9 and +6. And every LA Time poll has exhibited this pattern.
If you want to really track this election and understand what the numbers are saying, follow BTRTN (Born To Run The Numbers). You won't get caught up in any single poll. BTRTN aggregates and explains and also offers a bunch of funny commentary. This is their latest on the electoral college....
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2016/08/btrtn-50-state-electoral-snapshot-2.html
...and on the Senate:
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2016/08/btrtn-latest-senate-rack-up-as-close-as.html
reggieandlee
(778 posts)you should also look at his prediction about Dem VP... he picked Kaine a month before it happened. This site is amazingly accurate.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)reggieandlee
(778 posts)fascinating notion that it could all come down to Louisiana. Great state by state summary.
tgards79
(1,415 posts)No way are the Dems winning Louisiana in the runoff
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)tgards79
(1,415 posts)For example, in early August the LA Times had Clinton at +1 when the other concurrent polls had her at +10 (NBC), +8 (ABC), +7 (Economist/YouGov), +6 (Bloomberg) and +7 (IBD/TIPP). Same thing in late July...etc...etc...
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)That USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Poll is also very much tilted to the right (USC is a very conservative school), so I can imagine who the permanent panel of this particular poll is polling along with their "weird" methodology of how they come up with these numbers, especially in a state like California where tRump will get his ever-loving racist and ignorant clock cleaned come November
tgards79
(1,415 posts)I wonder why the aggregators include this pollster.
tgards79
(1,415 posts)Ignore LA Times, please, from now on.