Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,228 posts)
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 03:57 AM Mar 2013

The Congress That's Never There

Elspeth Reeve and Philip Bump
Mar 1, 2013

The 112th Congress was widely regarded as the worst Congress ever. The 113th -- which is just 58 days old, but will go into recess on Friday as the sequester hits -- is taking do-nothingness to the next level, because it has done nothing to stop the deliberately stupid cuts of the sequester from happening. 58 days is actually giving our legislators more credit than they're due: Congress has been in session just 23 of the 60 days so far in 2013 ...

More nothingness is coming. Rep. Paul Ryan has promised to use the debt ceiling -- as in, not raise it to pay bills the U.S. owes -- to get more spending cuts for Obama. And if Congress does nothing at the end of this month, we'll have a government shutdown.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/03/congress-s-never-there/62676/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Congress That's Never There (Original Post) struggle4progress Mar 2013 OP
Tag team against the American people. blkmusclmachine Mar 2013 #1
What DO they do during their frequent "recesses"? Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2013 #2
Sucking up to the banksters and corporate tyrants meow2u3 Mar 2013 #3
They spend most of their time on alsame Mar 2013 #4
This always sounds like a good story until you actually look into it onenote Mar 2013 #5
you may be right about recent Congresses dsc Mar 2013 #6
I've been around Congress since the late 1970s as well onenote Mar 2013 #7

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,392 posts)
2. What DO they do during their frequent "recesses"?
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 04:00 PM
Mar 2013

It would be interesting for a reporter to tail a Republican Congresscritter when the House isn't in session just to see..........for the heck of it.

meow2u3

(24,759 posts)
3. Sucking up to the banksters and corporate tyrants
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 05:27 PM
Mar 2013

....shaking them down for campaign contributions, then plotting their next coup.

onenote

(42,585 posts)
5. This always sounds like a good story until you actually look into it
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 04:03 PM
Mar 2013

Yes, the House has been in session just 23 days during the first two months of 2013. Horrors!! Until you stop and check and find out that's pretty much the average for the first two months over the past four years (in 2011 and 2012 when the repubs controlled the House, there were 22 and 28 days in session the first two months of the year and in 2009 and 2010 when the Democrats controlled the House, there were 27 and 20 days in session the first two months of the year).

dsc

(52,152 posts)
6. you may be right about recent Congresses
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 04:12 PM
Mar 2013

but past ones did operate much differently. One of MN freshman Congressman is a man who served in the late 1970's and he says it is night and day the difference. In the 1970's way more days were spent doing our work and way more hours of the day were spent doing our work, and not raising money etc.

onenote

(42,585 posts)
7. I've been around Congress since the late 1970s as well
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 05:27 PM
Mar 2013

Comparisons are tricky. Without question there is more time spent on fundraising etc. than in the past. But the number of days that Congress is in session (which seems to be the measure that gets thrown around to show how little work recent Congresses have done) is somewhat misleading.

For example, from 1976 through 1979, the average number of days the House was in session in the first two months of the year was 23.4 (high of 26 in 1975 and 1978, low of 19 in 1979). The total number of days in session for the year also fluctuated widely in the past. In 1975 it was 173. In 1976 it was 139. This pattern continued into the 1980s as well.

The biggest difference is that in the 70s and 80s it was not uncommon for Congress to finish its work and quit for the year before Thanksgiving. Indeed, in 1976, the last day Congress was in session was October 1 and in 1978 the last day was October 15. In 1984, Congress adjourned on October 12. In recent years, its become almost the norm for Congress to stay in session up to, if not past, Christmas. For example, even the rather thin schedule for the 113rd Congress has the House in session for two weeks in late November and another two weeks in early December.

The issue isn't the number of days that Congress is in session, its Congress' inability to compromise and reach agreements and/or the inability of the Senate to get bills over to the House. House staffers are forever complaining about the failure of the Senate to move legislation.

The following page provides links to data on the number of legislative days the House and Senate have been in session each year going back to 1975. Some of the totals for some of the years don't match up to the number of days identified as being in session. Not sure why that is.

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/ds/index.html#senate

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Congress That's Never...