2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumKey Democratic donors ante up, pushing party left
Kos
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/28/1197624/-Key-Democratic-donors-ante-up-pushing-party-Left
Nice:
Kenneth Lerer, a New York businessman who is chairman of Buzzfeed.com, and David Bohnett, a technology entrepreneur and philanthopist based in Los Angeles, are both major financial supporters of Democratic candidates, having each given scores of large contributions over the years. They are both key players in the political fundraising world and wield influence among other donors and fundraisers.
Neither will give another dime to any Senate Democrat who does not support expanded background checks, Im told and both will suggest to other donors that they do the same. The move underscores the rising importance of gun control as an issue in Democratic politics and the rising frustration in some Democratic circles with elected officials who continue to regard gun politics as a third rail, at a moment that presents a real opportunity to achieve serious reform, with a policy that enjoys near universal public support.
As much as we complain about politicians who put their finger in the wind to make decisions based on the shifting winds, Democrats are actually harmed by politicians who don't. As I wrote yesterday, part of our success as a movement has been to get Democrats to understand that they were on the unpopular side of many an issue, from the Iraq War, to equality, to immigration, and so on.
So here we are again, with too many Democrats opposed to sensible gun regulations despite massive popular support, simply because of fear and fealty to an increasingly impotent gun lobby.
But ours is a money-driven system. It was big donors who forced President Barack Obama's hand on marriage equality, the first time I saw a donor revolt pushing the party left. (Wall Street assholes abandoned Obama in 2012, but they were trying to push the Democrats to the right).
Hopefully this is a start of a trend. Too many big liberal voters (those not motivated by Wall Street excess) have given to the party and candidates uncritically in the past. It may be easy for Democrats to ignore a bunch of screaming activists. It's much harder to do so when their end-of-quarter financial reports depend on it.
Top donors threaten Dems: Do the right thing on guns, or no more money
(snip)
A third major fundraiser, Grace Tsau-Wu of Chicago, who was on Obamas national finance committee in 2012, also tells me she wont help any candidates who are weak on guns get connected with her network of donors. Its hard for me to personally fundraise or get involved in the campaigns of any Democrats who dont support background checks and arent behind the president on the issue of guns, she said.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/03/28/top-donors-threaten-dems-do-the-right-thing-on-guns-or-no-more-money/
(Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified)
Lerer: No background checks, no cash
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/03/lerer-no-background-checks-no-cash-160424.html#.UVR-SznYgF0.twitter
Response to cal04 (Original post)
AtomicKitten This message was self-deleted by its author.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)problem rather than punishing the party as a whole.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Is Palin still the threat? Or have we moved on to Rubio, or Jeb, or Paul, or Bachmann......
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)major push from thinking and caring folks in the Midwest or West Coast. Never from the South. Go Figure.
We People
(619 posts)DFW
(54,281 posts)Did somebody kidnap Lisa Blue and take her to Seattle?
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Background checks are a nice idea, but, under the right circumstances, I could support a generally progressive Democrat who waffled on that issue.