Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,737 posts)
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 12:18 AM Jun 2014

VIRGINIANS CHOOSE EVEN BIGGER TOOL

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report) — In a development that few had thought possible, Republicans in the Seventh District of Virginia on Tuesday night found an even bigger tool than Rep. Eric Cantor to represent them in the United States Congress.

Apparently deciding that Cantor was insufficiently heartless to represent their district, Republicans turned out to the polls to elect David Brat, a man whose political views “border on sociopathy,” according to exit-poll responses from voters who supported him.

During his concession speech, Rep. Cantor reflected on the mistakes that might have led to his defeat: “Should I have cut more school-lunch programs for poor children? Perhaps. Should I have cast more votes to screw over disaster victims? Definitely. Should I have not said the thing about treating children of immigrants like human beings? Man, do I wish I could take that one back. Hindsight is twenty-twenty, but at the end of the day I was just too damn empathic for this district.”

But Rep. Cantor was gracious in defeat, offering words of congratulation to the victorious Mr. Brat. “The people of the Seventh District have spoken,” he said. “The time has come to pass the torch to a new generation of asshats.”

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2014/06/virginians-choose-even-bigger-tool.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VIRGINIANS CHOOSE EVEN BIGGER TOOL (Original Post) Zorro Jun 2014 OP
"FOOL". Historic NY Jun 2014 #1
Cantor spent 5 million on ads, Brat only 200,000. Kablooie Jun 2014 #2
New Generation of Asshats! LOL! freshwest Jun 2014 #3
Personally ann--- Jun 2014 #4
Could be. Behind the Aegis Jun 2014 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jun 2014 #5
Absolutely agree! SoapBox Jun 2014 #7
I'll bet the Koch brothers have some big red palm prints on their foreheads. tofuandbeer Jun 2014 #8
True that - Cantor was bad, but ashling Jun 2014 #9
I suspect that many Democrats in the 7th voted for Brat to screw Cantor emsimon33 Jun 2014 #10

Kablooie

(18,625 posts)
2. Cantor spent 5 million on ads, Brat only 200,000.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:04 AM
Jun 2014

People might have voted for Brat because they were sick of Cantor ads and never wanted to see them again.

Response to Zorro (Original post)

tofuandbeer

(1,314 posts)
8. I'll bet the Koch brothers have some big red palm prints on their foreheads.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 03:20 AM
Jun 2014

Just when they thought they'd watered it down...
the tea party rips a huge unpredictable hole in the GOP.
I love it! (although, I'm not looking forward to this new guy being in congress, I sure hope he can be beat).

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
10. I suspect that many Democrats in the 7th voted for Brat to screw Cantor
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 03:53 AM
Jun 2014

In Virginia, we do not register a party affiliation when we register to vote. At primary time, we can vote for whomever we like but we can only vote once. Since the last minute Democratic candidate was running unopposed, why not go down to the polls and vote for Brat if you are a Democrat. I sure as hell would have done it.

Another fact that suggests that Democrats put Brat over the top was that moderate areas of the very gerrymandered 7th district where Cantor should have received more votes than Brat voted heavily for Brat--Democrats, I suggest, provided the unexpected results.

Finally, the polls before the election had Cantor winning. Having done 1000s of hours of telephoning to get out the vote and to supply information in Virginia elections, we call likely Democrats and likely Democratic voters when we call for the Democratic candidate before an election. The Republicans do the same. We do not want to alert the other side to the upcoming election (we do our best to determine who is more likely to vote one way or another from contribution in formation, from those who volunteer, canvassing, etc. Since we do not associate with a party when we register in Virginia, determining party affiliations does take a lot of time and effort.

Frankly, it all points to a cross overvote by Democrats to send a "Screw You!" to Cantor and the Republicans.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»VIRGINIANS CHOOSE EVEN BI...