Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GoLeft TV

(3,910 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 02:10 PM Jun 2014

SCOTUS v. UTERUS: Court’s Ruling Violates Women’s Reproductive Freedom

In yet another decision that proves it thinks the values of corporations are more important than those of their employees, the Supreme Court ruled today that closely-held corporations with religious owners cannot be required to provide contraceptive coverage for their employees as required for other business under the Affordable Care Act.

The Obama administration had already made accommodations or provided exemptions for churches, religious hospitals, schools, and nonprofits, but said that since for-profit corporations do not exercise religious beliefs as individuals, they would not be exempt.

In the 5-4 decision, with the majority opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito, SCOTUS determined that the government’s contraception mandate is not “the least restrictive means of advancing its interest in guaranteeing cost-free access to birth control.”

The case arrived at the Supreme Court after two corporations, Hobby Lobby, an arts-and-craft retail chain owned by evangelical Christians, and Conestoga Wood Specialties, a cabinet manufacturing company owned by Mennonites, argued that the contraception requirement violated the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act and infringed upon their First Amendment rights.


Full story at Ring of Fire.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS v. UTERUS: Court’s Ruling Violates Women’s Reproductive Freedom (Original Post) GoLeft TV Jun 2014 OP
The felonious five can be depended upon to become more felonious with the passage of indepat Jun 2014 #1

indepat

(20,899 posts)
1. The felonious five can be depended upon to become more felonious with the passage of
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 02:18 PM
Jun 2014

time, crapping profusely on the Constitution and its constituency in the process.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»SCOTUS v. UTERUS: Court’s...