2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSally Kohn: It now looks like Bernie Sanders could also actually win
Is America Bern-ing?But all the members wanted to talk about was Bernie Sanders.
They don't seem all that unique among Democratic voters or voters in general in Iowa. One poll in mid-September found Sanders with a 10-point lead over Hillary Clinton among likely Democratic primary voters. And a newer poll finds that Sanders fares better than Clinton even in general election matchups against possible GOP contenders.
Clinton's ace-in-the-hole in the face of Sanders' populist challenge was always supposed to be her better shot at electability. But even that seems to be eroding. As the saying goes, voters of all stripes increasingly "Feel the Bern."
Still, he's done more than simply move Hillary Clinton to the left, which was the original conventional wisdom about his candidacy. It now looks like Bernie Sanders could also actually win.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)laser focus on the end game.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)More from the OP link to the CNN article: Story highlights
Sally Kohn: Hillary's time on the public radar may be hurting her chances in presidential race.
Kohn: Vast majority of Americans favor Sanders' idea of "democratic socialism"
But Bernie Sanders is a socialist! No one would elect a socialist president, right? Not necessarily. This past June, Gallop found that almost half of Americans say they would vote for a socialist to be president. Plus once Americans learn more about what Sanders brand of socialism looks like, they may like him even more.
Sanders isn't for state-owned industry or anything in that extreme. Rather, he says, "What am I trying to do in this campaign is to tell Americans what many of them don't know: that the benefits for working people are a lot, lot stronger in many other countries around the world."
Sanders embraces the "democratic socialism" practiced in Scandinavia, for instance, where the government guarantees paid sick leave, universal health care and free higher education. Think Americans won't go for that? Well actually, when social scientists polled Americans across political perspectives about whether they preferred the unequal income distribution at play in the United States (where the top 20% control 84% of the wealth) of a supposedly-hypothetical, infinitely more equal distribution that actually mirrored Sweden's, guess what -- 92% of Americans preferred the wealth distribution of Sweden.
Sanders is showing he can really connect with voters across the board and articulate a populist vision that is sorely needed in America today.
mak3cats
(1,573 posts)That translates to a lot of crossover appeal. Unelectable? I think not.
Sliceo
(39 posts)Because she can't be wrong if he loses. Because she said "could".
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Only an idiot would say "will" this early in the game.
Response to arcane1 (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and you may quote me.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)And if they want to prove me wrong for saying that, they'll have to vote him in in the primary to find out.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)that Hillary is leading by 40%. Sol lets not take this article too serious.
Gothmog
(144,919 posts)You will get great odds. The betting world, Nate Silver, Predictwise and other experts are not convinced
valerief
(53,235 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,129 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)choose Wall Street over the 99%.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,129 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)compassion, I will say they are in denial. I should be obvious that the banksters and billionaires want control of the WH. I hope no one tries to deny that. And who have they chosen as their favorite candidate? Mr. Goldman-Sachs was unabashed when he said they would welcome either Bush or Clinton as president. One would think that that would be a huge red flag.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)So much wishful thinking.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)who needs polls?
They can be unskewed you know?
treestar
(82,383 posts)Bernie is winning is all 50 states, doncha know?
Except he is not. Oh, that.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Is sweeping the nation and he will not only get the dem nomination he will win all 50 states! Yippee!
I guess Hillary should just step aside for Bernie right nao!
riversedge
(70,084 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Pollsters know it.
I would start paying closer attention to those Bernie crowds - that seem to be meaningless to some.
Probably a more accurate predictor of the election outcome.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)because so much is still decided based on poll numbers, like who can
be (or not be) in the debates, etc. Go figure.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Why should they bother?
treestar
(82,383 posts)Maybe less accurate, but not on the scale you need to say Bernie is really winning when the polls show he is far behind.
Same old excuses, yet they seem to pretty much predict.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Where ever Bernie campaigns his polling numbers are closing in or surpassing hers. Feel The Bern!
AzDar
(14,023 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,164 posts)"...which was the original conventional wisdom about his candidacy. It now looks like Bernie Sanders could also actually win."
I may have to change my signature!