Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRobert Reich: Hillary Clinton is wrong, and Bernie Sanders is right, on Glass-Steagall
Here's a FB post by Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor under President Bill Clinton from 1993 to 1997.
Reich is currently Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley.
One of several important policy differences between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton -- that will likely come up at the first Democratic debate next Tuesday -- concerns the Glass-Steagall Act, the Depression-era legislation that separated investment from commercial banking and was repealed in 1999 by Bill Clinton and congressional Republicans. Bernie wants it resurrected; Hillary doesn't. Here's a piece explaining why Bernie is right and Hillary is wrong.
Link for FB post: https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/1083954798283782
Here's an excerpt from Robert Reich's article on Glass-Steagall
Ive also heard bank executives claim theres no reason to resurrect Glass-Steagall because none of the big banks actually failed.
This is like arguing lifeguards are no longer necessary at beaches where no one has drowned. It ignores the fact that the big banks were bailed out. If the government hadnt thrown them lifelines, many would have gone under.
Remember? Their balance sheets were full of junky paper, non-performing loans, and worthless derivatives. They were bailed out because they were too big to fail. And the reason for resurrecting Glass-Steagall is we dont want to go through that ever again.
As George Santayana famously quipped, those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. In the roaring 2000s, just as in the Roaring Twenties, Americas big banks used insured deposits to underwrite their gambling in private securities, and then dump the securities on their customers.
It ended badly.
This is precisely what the Glass-Steagall Act was designed to prevent and did prevent for more than six decades.
Hillary Clinton, of all people, should remember.
This is like arguing lifeguards are no longer necessary at beaches where no one has drowned. It ignores the fact that the big banks were bailed out. If the government hadnt thrown them lifelines, many would have gone under.
Remember? Their balance sheets were full of junky paper, non-performing loans, and worthless derivatives. They were bailed out because they were too big to fail. And the reason for resurrecting Glass-Steagall is we dont want to go through that ever again.
As George Santayana famously quipped, those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. In the roaring 2000s, just as in the Roaring Twenties, Americas big banks used insured deposits to underwrite their gambling in private securities, and then dump the securities on their customers.
It ended badly.
This is precisely what the Glass-Steagall Act was designed to prevent and did prevent for more than six decades.
Hillary Clinton, of all people, should remember.
Full Robert Reich article: http://robertreich.org/post/124114229225
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1085 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (36)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Reich: Hillary Clinton is wrong, and Bernie Sanders is right, on Glass-Steagall (Original Post)
gobears10
Oct 2015
OP
Just because other stuff needs to happen to reign in Wall Street and multinationals does NOT
stillwaiting
Oct 2015
#3
valerief
(53,235 posts)1. Reich would be a great VP for Bernie.
He served in the administrations of Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter and was Secretary of Labor under President Bill Clinton from 1993 to 1997.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)3. Just because other stuff needs to happen to reign in Wall Street and multinationals does NOT
mean that Glass Steagall does not need to be reimplemented as well.
Glass Steagall absolutely needs to be reinstated.