Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt seems to me that the opposite of Socialist is not Capitalist
Rather I think it would be Sociopath.
Who else would support unconscionable greed?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 699 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It seems to me that the opposite of Socialist is not Capitalist (Original Post)
hootinholler
Oct 2015
OP
Sociopath: "extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience",
cpompilo
Oct 2015
#2
aidbo
(2,328 posts)1. If corporations are people, ('my friend') then would they be a sociopath?
cpompilo
(323 posts)2. Sociopath: "extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience",
such as having little or no regard for one's community, one's workers or their well-being, or the societal impact of one's actions.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)3. Sounds pretty accurate to me. If corporations are people..
..then they are immortal, sociopathic billionaires with an undue amount of influence over our governing system.
They should be carefully watched.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)4. Or a fascist
nt