Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAttacks on Sanders Depict Obama As Lefty Failure as Opposed to Neoliberal Success
Attacks on Sanders, Progressives Falsely Depict Obama As Lefty Failure as Opposed to Neoliberal SuccessYves Smith
Naked Capitalism
A sign that the progressive cause is moving out of the wilderness and starting to rattle The Powers That Be is that the messaging apparatus is starting to attempt to demonize Sanders as a hopeless cause. That means hes moved from the first they ignore you phase in Gandhis classic trajectory of activism to somewhere between the then they ridicule you, then they fight you phases.
Well use a particularly noxious article from Slate, flagged by reader Jeff W, called, No, He Cant Bernie Sanders is an inspirational candidate, but his theory of change doesnt have a chance. Jeff W thought it warranted an NC version of Wheres Waldo? as in How many errors can readers spot in this article?
Mind you, what is important about pieces like this is not that they go after Sanders per se. The headline conveys the much bigger message: Change based on popular will wont happen, so all of you voters should just stop trying.
Now this is a ratcheting up of anti-democratic messaging when we are seeing major cracks in the institutional ice in the US and other countries that had moved strongly in the neoliberal direction. Jeremy Corbyns trouncing of the Blairites has had the elites in the UK frothing at the mouth. The magnitude of Justin Trudeaus win in Canada caught pundits by surprise. And in the US, Bernie Sanders was written off by the chattering classes from the very start of his campaign. Yet with virtually no media buys, the Democratic party turning away Sanders backers at the local level, until recently, a press blackout on his campaign, Sanders polls at somewhere between 25% ad 35% of Democratic voters, and nearly met Clintons fundraising level last quarter at far lower cost, meaning he almost certainly raised more money on a net basis.
I encourage readers to shred the details of the Slate article, but let me go after its thesis, which regular readers, and anyone with any political savvy, will recognize as bunk. As Jeff W summarized it: Bernie Sanders will fail because Barack Obama failed
This is utterly ludicrous because Obama did not fail. He was always a neoliberal, pro-status quo candidate who artfully presented himself when campaigning as being well to the left of where he actually sat.
Well use a particularly noxious article from Slate, flagged by reader Jeff W, called, No, He Cant Bernie Sanders is an inspirational candidate, but his theory of change doesnt have a chance. Jeff W thought it warranted an NC version of Wheres Waldo? as in How many errors can readers spot in this article?
Mind you, what is important about pieces like this is not that they go after Sanders per se. The headline conveys the much bigger message: Change based on popular will wont happen, so all of you voters should just stop trying.
Now this is a ratcheting up of anti-democratic messaging when we are seeing major cracks in the institutional ice in the US and other countries that had moved strongly in the neoliberal direction. Jeremy Corbyns trouncing of the Blairites has had the elites in the UK frothing at the mouth. The magnitude of Justin Trudeaus win in Canada caught pundits by surprise. And in the US, Bernie Sanders was written off by the chattering classes from the very start of his campaign. Yet with virtually no media buys, the Democratic party turning away Sanders backers at the local level, until recently, a press blackout on his campaign, Sanders polls at somewhere between 25% ad 35% of Democratic voters, and nearly met Clintons fundraising level last quarter at far lower cost, meaning he almost certainly raised more money on a net basis.
I encourage readers to shred the details of the Slate article, but let me go after its thesis, which regular readers, and anyone with any political savvy, will recognize as bunk. As Jeff W summarized it: Bernie Sanders will fail because Barack Obama failed
This is utterly ludicrous because Obama did not fail. He was always a neoliberal, pro-status quo candidate who artfully presented himself when campaigning as being well to the left of where he actually sat.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 579 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Attacks on Sanders Depict Obama As Lefty Failure as Opposed to Neoliberal Success (Original Post)
portlander23
Oct 2015
OP
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)1. "Progressives, you tried your best and failed miserably.
The lesson is: never try."
Words of wisdom from American's most astute political observer.
merrily
(45,251 posts)2. Great observation. When it comes to dissing Bernie, some writers will