EOM

The continuous stream of "Hillary just kicked unfamiliar republican's ass" random thought OPs is lame.

This has not occurred here!!!

I changed it.

Isn't this Meta?

btw - did you ask skinner about this?

eom

Probably will keep them on it for a week, because it got too hard to keep trashing every single OP.

I feel like I have been cluster bombed by the circus that is going on.


I came into this election thinking Benghazi was stupid now I think it is like the Kardashians...unrelenting.

I'm not sure what that has to do with my comment.

And since I'm not watching the hearings, there is nothing to vote on.

Carry on, and please stop changing the subject

Or was it the other guy or gal.

Mostly because those make Clinton look bad.

one sentence, thinking out loud, OPs. I don't see anything wrong with discussing the hearing, I just don't think it should resemble a Twitter feed.

Thank you in advance.

Well, at least a public service for you.

Without context, posts like "Hillary just put her foot up republican x's ass!" aren't very informative. Why not start an official thread?

One-sentence thoughts are not a blow-by-blow account.

I believe you were the gentleman who challenged me to censure my fellow Clinton supporters who spoke ill of Senator Sanders and I did.

I now humbly request you return the favor:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251713023


Thank you in advance.

for people to stop attacking each other's supporters.

In other words, you were not doing what you asked others to do. It had nothing to do with censuring Clinton supporters. It had to do with you.

You specifically asked me to censure Cali_Democrat, whom I am unwaveringly fond of, for an untoward post and I did. If you don't want to separate yourself from the noxious comments of an associate :


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251713023#post18

all that I can do is take solace in the fact that at least I tried.

any Clinton supporters. You asked for the attacks to stop, then launched attacks - even though you were not the "first to fire".

You are responsible for what you say. I am responsible for what I say. If there are assholes who happen to like the candidates we like, we are not responsible for what those assholes say.

I do not expect you to hold massive sway over Clinton supporters on DU, especially since your call for fewer attacks was not heeded. Why do you expect me to hold massive sway over Sanders supporters?

If we REALLY wanted to see it, we'd tune it in, somewhere.

So, posting some sort of stream of consciousness blow-by-blow for those of us who don't give a flying flip about it is kind of pointless.

We aren't reading them, anyway - but they are cluttering up the front page.

This is a glorious day for me that I am celebrating with a pizza, a beer , and a cigar...

The pizza and beer is to occupy me while Hillary kicks Republican ass and the cigar is to smoke when it's over.

Nothing can bother me on this beautiful day:

all of the posting in primaries section is getting highly obnoxious

political purposes, specifically to run tax paid political attacks throughout the 2016 elections means they are intended to influence the elections and must be included in the primary election dialog.

It didn't do much for me since I already hate republicans with every cell in my body. It also didn't change my mind about Mrs Clinton's Reagaesque platform. I am completely baffled about how the hearing today has any effect on her qualifications to be president, plus or minus.

I can understand their enthusiasm

Put up or shut up.

Are we really calling out a missed period?

This is the one and only time to see her face opponents she can actually beat

I can understand their enthusiasm

-arcane 1

Thanks for playing.

Most of us learned that in toddlerhood

And here I thought only the republicans wanted to return to the 50s.

But the whole point of the term Ms was to be as neutral re marriage status as Mr is for men. Many married women use it, as does the business and media world with a few holdouts.

For some reason my university still uses Miss to address mail to me, which is technically not incorrect but sounds antediluvian.

I'm originally from the south and the meanings were somewhat different at that time.

I love learning new things

When it came into usage in the early 70s. It took a couple of decades to go mainstream. And it's not just conservative regions where it's not often used. The NY Times just recently adopted it. In fact, since I stopped buying it in 2000 after the Gore fiasco (their coverage sucked), it's possible they still don't use it. I'm not sure.

it is a way to do away with the distinction between mrs and miss, where there is no distinction for men.

Then you won't see any of them.

A committee has been set up to derail the candidacy of the front runner of the democratic primary. This level of corruption in government is a big deal.

The majority party has set up a committee to effect primary election results.

and since this hearing is generating those, wish to move them out to GD?

Anything to do with Hillary, Bernie, etc. has to do with the primary in some fashion.

Since you seem to have such a crush on me today

Somebody has the sads today.

eom