Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 01:26 AM Oct 2015

How did DU Primaries become such a racially divisive place?

This has always been a rewarding but contentious discussion board but now it seems like there are so many threads and sub-threads with racially dividing undertones that it has become kind of an unpleasant place.

I am not against posts that discuss race issues but I feel a lot of what I am seeing here amounts to "when did you stop beating your wife" types of insinuations.

And what is this all for?

To many here I feel like Bernie Sanders supporters have been stereotyped as either outright racist or racially insensitive white males that only care about their own economic hides. In my case, as Sander's a supporter, I feel like that is very far from being true or fair.

As a group, doesn't our early and vigorous support of Obama in 2007 count for anything? Even when the black community at large was still polling more strongly for Hillary Clinton? Look back to then, who materially stood up for voting for the African American who became President before anyone else when the rest had cast their lot with the Establishment Democrat? Who? Who was it in 2008 in Iowa that handed Obama his first win, when he was far from considered a shoe in for the nomination?

Do the following words sound like someone who is insensitive to African American Issues or someone who is antithetical to their cause?

===

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Bread%20and%20Circus/1

Bread and Circus's Journal

The Democratic Party stands idly by as Obama takes a public whipping

Posted by Bread and Circus in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Wed Mar 19th 2008, 03:12 PM

I'm white, I'm male, and I'm 36. I grew up poorer than most in an economically challenged small Midwestern town on free lunch tokens, AFDC Checks, and food stamps. My mom was single and bounced around from job to job but was most of the time unemployed. When I was 5, we lived in a tent in a campground for about 4 months as we were effectively homeless. After that, we moved to what became "my home town" and I grew up in subsidized housing for low-income people (mainly single moms and their kids) for the next 11 years.

My mom, like Barack's family, instilled in me notion to value an education.

I went to public schools and public universities. My high school grades weren't that amazing but I managed to usually make the honor rolls. I didn't get into my first choice of public university but I got into my second choice. I graduated third in my class at a university of 26,000 (40,000 if you count grad students) with a degree in psychology and a pre-med focus. This gave me a good chance to go to an excellent public Medical University.

From there, I went to residency in the Northeast and as a resident I learned first-hand what it's like to be a second-class citizen. If anyone has watched Scrubs and gets the sense that interns and residents are basically treated like dirt, take note, it's real. There's more truth in that show about the field of medicine than in any medical drama I ever found. And what I learned from those brief intense years is that being systematically treated with disrespect and a proverbial boot on your neck is demoralizing. It degrades your soul. I only see it so clearly now because from the moment I graduated until the current day, the contrast between that hell of 126 hour work weeks and 42 hour shifts and the privileged status I currently have is stark and amazing. One day, I was told what to do by people with a lot less education than me, the next day after I graduate I get the authority to give orders to others that literally hold life and death in the balance.

I've never walked a day in America as a black person, a woman, or as any other group that suffers a minority of social power. I was only subject to a brief and cruel social experiment called a "residency" that is really just hazing disguised as education. But what I learned then was that when your whole world has you by the short hairs and steps on your neck and makes you feel less than worthwhile, there's not a lot you can do. It's a devastating and all-encompassing experience. I'm still angry about it because in my opinion I was abused and I expect to always feel that way.

But somehow between then and now I realized that my experience was to be learned from and the best thing I think I learned was compassion for others that suffer as victims of social injustice. I only got a small taste of what is a pervasive lifelong negative experience for others. It's one of the reasons why I have a special sensitivity for African Americans. In the long view, I can think of no other group of people that have had it worse in the history of our young country.

And all of that leads me to why I'm so damn angry right now at the Democratic Party, the reasons I'd like to further discuss as follows.

It's an undeniable fact that there's a coordinated effort to push the Jeremiah Wright story in a vastly slanted and misleading way. There's two main groups that benefit and they are obvious, the Republican Partisans and the Clinton Campaign. If hard pressed I think this is mainly the dirty work of the Republican Partisans. They want to hamper whoever is the "front runner" in the Dem Race in order to make this go on as long as possible. If they can drive the negatives high and the race ends very late, the Dem nominee will have very little time to recover. If Hillary were on a straight path to the nomination right now (she's not), then there'd be some sensationalized story she'd be confronting. I don't think the Clinton campaign has flamed this story but I'm sure it's not breaking Penn, Clinton, and Wolfson's collective cold heart to stand idly by and do nothing.

But what is really tragic and criminal about all of this is that this story has NOTHING to do with what anything Obama has done, said, or stands for. What he stands for is the very opposite of Jeremiah Wright's approach to White Racism. Rather than fight with anger, Obama seeks to bring understanding, reason, and the reflection that comes when we "see ourselves in others" for a moment and build on the improvements in society that have already been made. This is apparent to me and anyone giving a fair hearing on the topic.

Obama's speech yesterday encapsulates this but it will not put the issue to rest. It will be brought up time and time again and it may very well be Obama's undoing now or in the General Election. But it won't be that Obama hasn't tried to create understanding. It will mainly be because the Democratic Party is essentially turning its back on blacks.

I once read recently by a black person on one of the blogs whose sentiment was this: "we are good enough to vote for you, but apparently we not good enough for you to vote for us." That's a powerful statement and certainly rings true for a lot of Democrats. Unfortunately this dovetails into the Republican Partisan claim that the Democratic Party takes blacks for granted, which is starting to feel more true each and everyday I watch this process unfold. Even sadder is that the Black Community has no reasonable alternative choice. Neither do liberals.

This is further proven by how the Democratic party uses blacks as a cog in the "Democratic Machine". This "machine" concept was explained to me the other day on DU and how it goes is that there are different ways the Democrats turn out votes and one of them is to get the "Black Preachers" to fire up their flock to get into the voting booth. These are the same "Black Preachers" of whom many respect and agree with Wright.

It's that last example that's sticking in my craw because the way I see it the Democratic Party uses the "Fiery Black Preachers" when it is convenient for them but when it looks bad, they leave Jeremiah Wright, and all those like him, out in the wind. For two weeks, all I hear is the Republican echo chamber but not any prominent Democratic leaders fighting back. Though Obama can't disown Wright, the Democratic Party publicly has. If Jeremiah Wright was an exception and a crackpot then I could maybe see the reasoning. But he's not and deep down a lot of what he says, though looking bad, is just plainly true, especially when viewed with a liberal lens.

So yesterday, after my third watching of Obama's amazing speech, I started to get the sense that not only was I seeing a great leader eloquently talking to us as adults and telling us like it is but that I was also seeing Obama take a public whipping for all of us. He had the courage to apologize for Wright's incendiary language as well as apologize for the racism and resentment that exists on both sides. He did it partly for his political career, but I think he also did it because he just plain had to. If he hadn't spoken up in contrition, this was likely to continue to deepen the racial divide and serve as a yet another brick in the wall that separates White from Black. He took the whipping so the rest of us didn't have to.

But the crime of it is that Obama is generally standing alone in the public square while Hannity, Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs, and the rest all take out their proverbial lashes on him. The Democratic party has by and large generally just stood by and watched. Even if he becomes the nominee, I expect they will continue to do so. Just like they let the Gore mis-characterizations continue to thrive and how they let Kerry be painted as a traitor to the military.

But Obama in the long run is not going to be the only ones paying the price, we all will. Instead of taking this chance to put the racists back in a bottle and tell them we aren't going to accept what they have to give anymore, we've acquiesced and shrunk away from the challenge in fear. And just like the master riding the horse and whipping it into submission, the master's power grows as long as the horse is afraid.

Jeremiah Wright's approach as seen on the clips is wrong on many levels when viewed through a political lens because when he's yelling and angry he seems threatening and dangerous. However, in reality he has probably done more tangible good for people, in terms of lives saved and helped, than most people on this board put together. He's especially done more public good than the Hannities and Limbaughs of the world. Finally, he is certainly a LOT less dangerous in his rhetoric compared to the poison spewed by Right Wing Hate Radio every day. Anyone who disagrees with that last statement shouldn't be on a liberal discussion board, period.

Furthermore, it's certain that his angry outbursts are an exception to his record which is widely touted and highly regarded by the black church community. And make no mistake, the black church community is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party. We haven't seen much of the "good side of Wright" in the past two weeks even though the videos and records are out there. And the reason being is that the nefarious forces that want to conquer liberalism don't want you to see them. They don't want you to see Jeremiah Wright as a whole man. They don't want you to see him as a good person. They just want to you see him as an angry black man, a crackpot, a demagogue. Mainly, they just want to you to see an offensive image that will short circuit your thinking. And then they want you to associate the negative image with Obama or at the very least make you question Obama's judgment as to to why he could attach him self to "such a bad guy".

It is just plain wrong for people like Edwards, Gore, Clinton, Richardson, Pelosi, and the rest of the talking Democratic heads to just stand idly by as this will no doubt continue to unfold. They can't just leave it to black people and they can't just leave it to Obama to defend themselves. Democrats of all colors have to stand up and say enough is enough, and we are drawing a line in the sand and though Wright may not look pretty at times, he is still one of us. YOU WILL NOT divide us and YOU WILL NOT conquer us. Limbaugh, Hannity, and the rest, you ARE NOW THE MINORITY and if you want to join us then all you have to is open your mind, change your heart, and change your ways. If we don't do this and continue to allow ourselves to be split along racial lines against our own common values and principles, we will continue to lose and we will continue to see more Iraq Wars, more Right Wing judges, and more devastation to the economic interests of poor and middle class.

===

And before I get a backlash for that post being somehow not "correct" know that I received 272 Recs for it, which is a fairly high number if you were not NanceGreggs, Plaidadder, or Will Pitt. In other words, it was fairly popular and it received a lot of praise. I am not saying it's above reproach but I am saying I meant what I wrote and a lot of people really liked it, especially many of the African Americans who were posting here at the time.

===

My sentiment has not changed and the past 8 years have only served to show what I said in that post was correct in more ways than one.

It's also the reason I strongly support Sanders as I truly believe in my heart of hearts and know as a physician who deals with the ravages of poverty and an anti-working class rigged system every day that economic issues are fundamental to everyone's well being especially when it comes to African Americans and their health and their lives.

As the original Clinton campaign used to say "It's the economy, stupid". It was true then and it is true now.

I could go on and on how poverty disables, maims, and kills. That is for another post but the stats are easy to find. Just google leading causes of death of Americans in general and then various groups of people. It may not be as sensational as some of the horrible cases we have had to witness in the news but impoverishment is a slow persistent degradation of the soul, the mind, and the body.

Yes we can work on specific things to correct institutional and non-institutional racism in this country and I think all of the three main candidates are becoming wise to addressing this more overtly. But fundamentally, under it all, many of us truly do believe the fundamental problem for everyone, especially African Americans, is an economic one. Even so, this is not an either-or set of solutions, we can work on all fronts.

We can certainly have a debate about how to do that and I would like to. But it doesn't seem as if it would be a fair debate because it feels like the moment you don't overtly and categorically disregard the economic issue as being fundamental to everyone's plight, then you are plagued with the implied meme that you are not really "getting it" or you are not really "racially sensitive" to what's going on. And this is the last thing you want to have applied to you on a left leaning forum board.

But here's the thing, many of us really do feel the underpinning problems are economic, environmental, and campaign finance related. We feel that correcting these things would create a better playing field for everyone, especially the African American community.

And honestly, up until recently I thought this was just an "accepted concept" on the left and especially on DU. I have always seen the Democratic Party as being about economic justice as much or more than anything. This is what everything I heard and read through the years had taught me about being part of the left.

At what point did that not become true? Or was it ever true?

And then in the end... why do I care anymore? I am now a wealthy physician. I make a ton of money. I pay a lot of taxes. I don't really get much personally for my taxes. I'm white thus I experience that privilege. I am male, thus there is an assumption I am competent before I have to "prove myself". Why should I even care? What do I need the Democratic Party for? And these are the things I keep thinking when I read these insulting posts about how Bernie Sanders' supporters are inferred to be these "out of touch white male supremacists".

I honestly really wish I didn't care. But I still do. I can't stop caring. I really care a lot. I think a lot of us do. And many of us really feel we need a fundamental change in direction in the Democratic Party and a fundamental change in the country. We feel we might get that from Sanders. We don't feel, judging from past experience, we will get that from Clinton.

In the end I feel this whole racial bit is a cynical ploy to push the interests of Clinton over the interests of Sanders for the simple fact that one of the linchpins to the Democratic nomination is held by the Democratic African American vote. If Sanders and his side can be saddled with the inference that they are somehow against the interest of African Americans, it further solidifies Clinton's position as the front runner. In other words, they are one of her firewalls. And because you have to be extraordinarily sensitive when dealing with this type of framing, it sort of hampers open and free debate. And I think that is the whole goal. Just end the debate. Just shut this thing down. Just don't even have a robust discussion. Let's coronate the frontrunner and be done with it.

It feels very Rovian and hearkens back to the Bush days when one would not dare speak out against the "War on Terror". Hillary's IWR vote is the very proof of the effect of such tactics.

Well I don't want to be in that kind of Country, I don't want to participate in that kind of Party, and I don't want to participate in that kind of forum board. I'm not ready to leave but I am getting weary. Why even try, why even go vote? For what? To stop the Republicans? I feel like if the Democratic Party can't even have an honest true argument with itself to make it a better Party, what good is saving it? It feels like a corrupted form of itself and one that I am becoming not to like. And anyway 4 to 8 years isn't that long and most of the time the Democrats just cave in to the Republicans anyway so... yeah... there's that.

Then I think of the Supreme Court. The one and only true reason to pull that lever no matter what. This one thing that I just can't just walk away from. Sigh. Because yes, I don't want to see the terror that will get ravaged upon this nation with more "Citizen United" decisions among other such horrors.

So then what, am I basically held to this Party now without a voice because of this one reason?

What a dilemma.

Sheesh.

In the end I believe Clinton is going to win the Nomination and honestly probably the Presidency. I just don't think the Party or the Country is quite there for a Democratic Socialist no matter how straightforward and reasonable he may be. Not to mention, when you get down to it, people agree with him more on the issues that anyone.

I also believe Clinton will be better than any Republican even though she is miles from where I would want her to be as a President. My grievances with her have been well articulated elsewhere on DU.

But until Sanders concedes I will also continue to criticize her and her supporters on DU whenever I recognize they are not being truthful and honest, when they are not being fair, and when they are not elevating the debate. Being racially divisive is not elevating the debate and I am calling this out.

Being racially divisive is what Republicans do, it's not what Democrats do.














48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How did DU Primaries become such a racially divisive place? (Original Post) Bread and Circus Oct 2015 OP
I must hate my own people because I am black and big JRLeft Oct 2015 #1
Because the USA is a racially divisive country. delrem Oct 2015 #2
Not all the Founding Fathers thought slavery was cool Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #43
The tone of your post Chitown Kev Oct 2015 #3
And we were wrong he's bought and paid for. He's showing his true colors daily. JRLeft Oct 2015 #4
Maybe...maybe not...that's not my point Chitown Kev Oct 2015 #10
Unfortunately, the country was so racist at the time no way we could benefit. JRLeft Oct 2015 #14
Why are you bringing up Bill Clinton in response to Kev's point about FDR? Number23 Oct 2015 #15
Sorry about that, I wanted to point out how Wall Street's policies JRLeft Oct 2015 #17
Well, black folks (and other POC) are kind of used to being fucked over Chitown Kev Oct 2015 #21
True, even under Bush with the option arm aka adjustable rate mortgages. JRLeft Oct 2015 #42
That's my point... Chitown Kev Oct 2015 #18
I made a post years ago that talked about the white liberal left's harassing and haranguing Number23 Oct 2015 #32
Well this Bernie Sanders supporter thinks the African American community owes Snotcicles Oct 2015 #37
It isn't really Fumesucker Oct 2015 #5
It was the reaction to Black Lives Matter that did it BainsBane Oct 2015 #6
Good OP, thank you. DU is not racially divisive. There are a few people here TRYING to make it so, sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #7
I think the best way to understand might be to murielm99 Oct 2015 #8
+100000000000 BainsBane Oct 2015 #11
Yup! Cali_Democrat Oct 2015 #13
I went the Blacklivesmatter website and I am confused. Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #38
You are talking to the wrong person. murielm99 Oct 2015 #39
I am not sure if I am to take your post as being helpful or arrogant. Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #40
I was trying to be helpful. murielm99 Oct 2015 #47
ok thank you Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #48
I'll give this a shot gwheezie Oct 2015 #9
Great post. nt Cali_Democrat Oct 2015 #12
Perfect response from you. As usual Number23 Oct 2015 #16
+1 Starry Messenger Oct 2015 #22
This....all of it. nt Bobbie Jo Oct 2015 #24
Nothing to add Dem2 Oct 2015 #29
Well spoken. Skidmore Oct 2015 #30
Beautifully stated! n/t Spazito Oct 2015 #34
Nailed it. Agschmid Oct 2015 #44
Most of it is done by a small group of people AgingAmerican Oct 2015 #19
IMO it started when it became very beneficial to one candidates supporters to make it that way azurnoir Oct 2015 #20
Calling Black Lives Matter a "Soros funded Hillary group" didn't help. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #23
Ask the guy who diagnosed black and LGBT Hillary supporters as suffering from Stockholm Syndrome..nt SidDithers Oct 2015 #25
^^^ This right here MohRokTah Oct 2015 #31
Start here Bobbie Jo Oct 2015 #26
BJ, I think the genesis of all of this was Cali_Dem's OP in May where he dared to note Hillary's Number23 Oct 2015 #33
Ah, right you are... Bobbie Jo Oct 2015 #36
That gif... Agschmid Oct 2015 #45
Exactly Armstead Oct 2015 #27
Sour grapes. randome Oct 2015 #28
I put the people who try to stir up crap on ignore. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #35
Bernie has a 100% rating from the NAACP Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #46
Excellent post and sorry I did not see this earlier ... slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #41

delrem

(9,688 posts)
2. Because the USA is a racially divisive country.
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 01:42 AM
Oct 2015

You still don't seem to understand that your "founding fathers", those saints of your patriotic fervor, thought that slavery was cool.

You are backward.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
43. Not all the Founding Fathers thought slavery was cool
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:48 AM
Oct 2015

John Adams, for example, had no slaves, and Benjamin Franklin, who had slaves at one time, became an abolitionist.

The 13th Amendment has been the law of the land for 150 years, and the Civil Rights Act has been the law of the land for more than 50 years.

Chitown Kev

(2,197 posts)
3. The tone of your post
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 01:48 AM
Oct 2015

and of some Sanders supporters, generally, comes off as if you feel that the African American community owes Bernie Sanders and his supporters something.

Let's not get it twisted. African Americans nationwide did their own vetting of Obama after he won Iowa but the black community did vet him, by our community's own standards and own criteria.

Bernie Sanders will have to go through the same process.

(and of course, I'm used to Obama so...)

Chitown Kev

(2,197 posts)
10. Maybe...maybe not...that's not my point
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 02:02 AM
Oct 2015

but that is for the black community to decide based on whatever criteria that members of our community decides (which includes a number of factors...and of course, many people (not just African Americans) are members of multiple communities.

My point is that white progressives have no moral grounds to dictate what candidates we should vote for and our criteria for voting for them...and quite a few white progressives are doing that through browbeating and what not (and of course, some black progressives don't like Sanders or Clinton).

People need to go back and read their history; I posted a lot of stuff on bravenak's thread about FDR, The New Deal, and how The New Deal, in some was, wasn't that good for blacks. About 75% of blacks still voted for FDR from 1936-44 (personally, I think that was more of a vote for Eleanor than for Franklin).

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
14. Unfortunately, the country was so racist at the time no way we could benefit.
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 02:10 AM
Oct 2015

Bill Clinton's policies did us in, his policies were never about us. He was represented Wall Street and his cabinet represented just that.

Bernie wants to reintroduce keynesian economics and mod it with the great society. I agree we as people need more targeted economics though. Please believe this my brother, we ain't getting that from Hillary.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
15. Why are you bringing up Bill Clinton in response to Kev's point about FDR?
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 02:28 AM
Oct 2015

ChitownKev talks about FDR and you somehow pivot to make this about Clinton??? Am I missing something here?

And how even though FDR's policies didn't even pretend to benefit black people, black people still supported him? And it was our right to do so, just as it is our right to vote for whomever we wish without being hounded and harassed.

Chitown Kev

(2,197 posts)
21. Well, black folks (and other POC) are kind of used to being fucked over
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 03:09 AM
Oct 2015

In FDR's and Truman's day it was redlining and urban renewal (or negro removal), in the Clinton/Bush era it was subprime mortgages

Chitown Kev

(2,197 posts)
18. That's my point...
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 02:40 AM
Oct 2015

and,,as I stated in the other thread, FDR had his good points to (key people like Frances Perkins and Harold Ickes were put in key positions and, thanks to the WPA, the black arts and black artisans did find employment) but to support FDR (in spite of the Southern Dems) was our community's decision to make. The white progressives of those times (true socialists and communists)did not particularly care for Roosevelt and pushed him further left.

And folks weren't going through a whole lot of butthurt when Clinton (which FDR had to deal with) was in office (when it was hard NOT to keep a job).

Number23

(24,544 posts)
32. I made a post years ago that talked about the white liberal left's harassing and haranguing
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 04:25 PM
Oct 2015

of FDR. It was astonishing. The man caught so much of the same crap that Obama hears on a regular basis today.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022802736#post153 and http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2808186

Too cozy with banks. Too concerned with the rich. It was amazing. And now these same folks (or their descendants) act as though he is the second coming. And I have no doubt and have always said that these same folks will do the same with Obama. They will be screaming to the hills about how much they "supported" him and how "great" he was even while they call him every vile name they can think of while he's in office.

I can't tell if it's just hypocrisy, ignorance or what but it's amazing. And what's more I have no doubt that this type of behavior has isolated the American left more than anything else.

 

Snotcicles

(9,089 posts)
37. Well this Bernie Sanders supporter thinks the African American community owes
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 07:31 PM
Oct 2015

themselves something. And I think when they get a closer look they will find it in Bernie Sanders.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
6. It was the reaction to Black Lives Matter that did it
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 01:54 AM
Oct 2015

That sort of thing leaves an indelible mark.

It's worked out as Clinton vs. Sanders, or more accurately some Sanders supporters vs. non-Sanders supporters (some support O'Malley, some Clinton, and a good number are undecided) because of how members of color on this site have been treated. It is not a stereotype. It is their experience. It is also something that has been painful for me to watch, even though I am white. I can't begin to imagine what was like for African Americans, some of whom actively participating here as Sanders supporters before the backlash to the Black Lives Matter events.

I appreciate the unity today surrounding Clinton's testimony, and I respect your and anyone else's right to choose whatever candidate you like for the Democratic nomination. But the threads I saw following the two events where Black Lives Matter interrupted Sanders, in which far too many participated in perverse conspiracies created to discredit black activists fighting to save the lives of Americans, are not something anyone can or in my view should forget. Some want to pretend it never happened, or that it was somehow a creation of the Clinton campaign, but many of us remember with great clarity exactly what transpired. Some chose to show us who they are, and that cannot be unseen.

You can have whatever theoretical position about race and class that you want, but that does not substitute for the experience of being black or another person of color. I submit that the answer lies in listening, and that means being subject to conversations that may make us, as white people, uncomfortable. That is not "divisive." It is part of being a socially conscious member of a diverse society that continues to be racked by racism.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
7. Good OP, thank you. DU is not racially divisive. There are a few people here TRYING to make it so,
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 01:54 AM
Oct 2015

IGNORE THEM. Most Duers do. And DU has not changed, they just YELL LOUDER so they it will seem like there rae more of them. Not worth the attention.

murielm99

(30,730 posts)
8. I think the best way to understand might be to
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 01:58 AM
Oct 2015

go to the AA forum and read the threads there. Just read, just listen, don't post, don't defend yourself. Just learn.

I did not say there was anything wrong with you. But simply listening and reading can go a long way toward understanding.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
38. I went the Blacklivesmatter website and I am confused.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 12:27 PM
Oct 2015

The website I went to seems very odd to me in terms of the language and thrust of the argument.

Frankly a lot of it just didn't make sense.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
40. I am not sure if I am to take your post as being helpful or arrogant.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 12:48 AM
Oct 2015

But you jumped into my thread, I didn't jump into yours.

You started the conversation with me. So if I am "talking to the wrong person" then it must be your mistake?

Either way, I hope you are trying to be helpful if not a bit cryptic.

murielm99

(30,730 posts)
47. I was trying to be helpful.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 02:22 AM
Oct 2015

What I said in post number 8 was meant politely.

I am white, and a Clinton supporter. I am not the right person to explain the experiences of POC. I mean that sincerely.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
9. I'll give this a shot
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 02:00 AM
Oct 2015

I'm a democrat, I'm going to vote straight dem ticket in any election. In my primary I will vote for Clinton.
I am also white and stand with black activists. The democratic party has not progressed towards racial equality without black activists pushing the party forward. So I support that. I think both candidates have fallen short and don't get what the issue is.
When blm got on stage with Bernie, there was a backlash against blm and some Bernie supporters were more interested in defending their candidate than supporting blm. It was disgusting. African American members of this site were out on the defensive and followed to the AA group and alerted on personally I came to the conclusion the only way to fight racism is for white people to stop being racist. There was out right barely concealed racism, calling an AA group member a race nagger. Claiming AA members of du were racist because they supported black lives matter. Otoh, there was the subtle responses of if only blm had nicer tactics etc.
Give me a break, if blm did that to Hillary or any GOP they would not complain about the tactics.
On the Hillary side, and I support her, she has not so far responded effectively to the concerns blm and other activist groups brought to her but I don't read many Hillary supporters on this site taking this criticism personally. I expect her to do better.
To me, white people are responsible for racism and the continued assault on black lives in this country. It's a fact. White people need to fix themselves. I can't act hurt and defensive when I belong to the group that caused all this misery in the lives of black folks.
Individually some of us are less racist overtly than others, some whites have put their bodies and lives on the line but we have been the group who holds the power and apparently there aren't enough of us who really want equality because if there was, the country would be different. To me, it then falls to white people who don't want to be racists to confront our own racism, individually and with our peers. It is not up to black folks to make white folks stop being racist.
So in response to black people dying in the country because of racists its kinda tone deaf when white folks are upset if they are made to feel like racists.
This is not a personal attack, its what it is.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
20. IMO it started when it became very beneficial to one candidates supporters to make it that way
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 03:08 AM
Oct 2015

the race baiting of Bernie Sanders began almost immediately after he announced his candidacy, seems to be forgotten, that his supporters defended him is then of course interpreted as racism or whitesplaining, then we have the townhall and Seattle in both cases Bernie was subjected to a situation that Hillary never would be as she is surrounded by Secret Service

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
23. Calling Black Lives Matter a "Soros funded Hillary group" didn't help.
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 08:13 AM
Oct 2015

Neither did the endless op's calling one of them a Palin supporter and digging through and harassing their social media pages either.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
31. ^^^ This right here
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 09:25 AM
Oct 2015

Insult and treat a group of people like children and they will despise your candidate.

I don't think Sanders will ever be able to overcome the damage his followers did to his reputation on Twitter.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
33. BJ, I think the genesis of all of this was Cali_Dem's OP in May where he dared to note Hillary's
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 04:41 PM
Oct 2015

then 87% support from the black community. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026706470 The responses were so ignorant, privileged, paternalistic, moronic and embarrassing that I did an OP about them in AA a few days later. http://www.democraticunderground.com/118714610

This happened a few months before Black Lives Matter. And when Netroots and Seattle did happen, all it did was blow the lid off what was already a fairly serious problem.

So daring to note Hillary's strong minority support in May started it all imo. That was the start of the "but what has she ever done for THEM??!" and "black people don't know what's good for us" crap. It was also the start of the "Bernie is a civil rights legend" mess that spread all over the Internet and had people of all colors over every corner of the Internet looking at Bernie supporters like this:



It's been downhill ever since.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
36. Ah, right you are...
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 05:51 PM
Oct 2015

I do remember both of those threads (rec'ed them both at the time) and you're right, it's been downhill ever since.

I was just so thoroughly disgusted with the blm response, that those threads were the first ones that came to mind.


Yeah, much like this....


[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]





 

randome

(34,845 posts)
28. Sour grapes.
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 09:01 AM
Oct 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
35. I put the people who try to stir up crap on ignore.
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 04:53 PM
Oct 2015

I know Bernie supports the AA community. His record proves it.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
46. Bernie has a 100% rating from the NAACP
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:52 AM
Oct 2015

He marched with Dr. King in Washington, worked to desegregate Chicago University housing, and campaigned for Jesse Jackson. And yet, somehow, that's still "not enough"

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
41. Excellent post and sorry I did not see this earlier ...
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:34 AM
Oct 2015

our daughter attended med school and did her residency at an inner city hospital and saw many of the same problems with people coming to the clinic and not being able to follow through with the medical attention they needed. Poverty and education play a large role in people's health and we need to try and break that cycle by offering more support.

Keep caring and thank you!



From your post ...


"... It's also the reason I strongly support Sanders as I truly believe in my heart of hearts and know as a physician who deals with the ravages of poverty and an anti-working class rigged system every day that economic issues are fundamental to everyone's well being especially when it comes to African Americans and their health and their lives.

As the original Clinton campaign used to say "It's the economy, stupid". It was true then and it is true now.

I could go on and on how poverty disables, maims, and kills. That is for another post but the stats are easy to find. Just google leading causes of death of Americans in general and then various groups of people. It may not be as sensational as some of the horrible cases we have had to witness in the news but impoverishment is a slow persistent degradation of the soul, the mind, and the body.

Yes we can work on specific things to correct institutional and non-institutional racism in this country and I think all of the three main candidates are becoming wise to addressing this more overtly. But fundamentally, under it all, many of us truly do believe the fundamental problem for everyone, especially African Americans, is an economic one. Even so, this is not an either-or set of solutions, we can work on all fronts.

We can certainly have a debate about how to do that and I would like to. But it doesn't seem as if it would be a fair debate because it feels like the moment you don't overtly and categorically disregard the economic issue as being fundamental to everyone's plight, then you are plagued with the implied meme that you are not really "getting it" or you are not really "racially sensitive" to what's going on. And this is the last thing you want to have applied to you on a left leaning forum board.

But here's the thing, many of us really do feel the underpinning problems are economic, environmental, and campaign finance related. We feel that correcting these things would create a better playing field for everyone, especially the African American community..."




Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How did DU Primaries beco...