Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalArkie

(15,713 posts)
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 08:29 PM Oct 2015

Sorry, Hillary, Gay Rights Advocates Say Bernie Is Right On DOMA History

WASHINGTON -- Late last week, the two leading Democratic presidential candidates sparred over one of the darker chapters of the gay rights movement: the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law that barred federal recognition of same-sex marriage.

At issue was President Bill Clinton's motive for signing the measure. Hillary Clinton called it a defensive maneuver to ward off more crippling legislation. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called bunk on her history. A review of contemporaneous news articles and interviews with key players at the time supports Sanders' version more than Clinton's.

DOMA was and remains a blight on President Clinton's record. Though he disavowed the law in 2013 and called for its reversal before the Supreme Court struck it down this year, DOMA continues to be problematic for his wife, as it was during an interview with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Friday night.

"I think what my husband believed -- and there was certainly evidence to support it -- is that there was enough political momentum to amend the Constitution of the United States of America and that there had to be some way to stop that," said Hillary Clinton. "In a lot of ways, DOMA was a line that was drawn that was to prevent going further."

Snip

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-doma_562e7dcae4b0c66bae58eb2e

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sorry, Hillary, Gay Rights Advocates Say Bernie Is Right On DOMA History (Original Post) LiberalArkie Oct 2015 OP
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #1
Again, it's a tactic borm of desperation. eom NorthCarolina Oct 2015 #2
Yep portlander23 Oct 2015 #3
My recollection was more of a "triangulation" zipplewrath Oct 2015 #4
Sanders himself, just now on Rachel's show, admitted to being against same-sex marriage BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #5
lol retrowire Oct 2015 #6
That's not what he said in the video. Was his opinion then political expediency in order BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #15
This is what he said in the 2006 video: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #16
You have it. In 1979, I was a co-chair for Upstate NY for the planning of the Bohunk68 Oct 2015 #30
I remember being outraged too. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #31
absolutely retrowire Oct 2015 #19
Well, if that's what you need to believe, so be it. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #22
excellent counter argument retrowire Oct 2015 #24
Not a counter argument. It was an exasperated response. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #25
Not a matter of "need to believe." Bohunk68 Oct 2015 #32
Nice! Accusing someone of projection with projection. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #33
Truth is what it is. The "need" business is all yours inasmuch as you coined it for your usage. Bohunk68 Oct 2015 #38
sorry Robbins Oct 2015 #9
I'm not attacking him. Sanders supporters really need to understand BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #18
It is neither an exaggeration nor a lie. Kentonio Oct 2015 #21
No. It was an exaggeration for political expediency. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #23
That "article" was debunked. The blogger lied about the 2006 video and used unsourced quotes. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #26
Oh jesus Robbins Oct 2015 #36
Take it up with the author of that piece. A typo? Or a case of "lost in political title translation? BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #37
That is a lie. Here is the transcript from the 2006 video cited by the slate blogger: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #13
kablam! retrowire Oct 2015 #20
Crickets, such a peaceful sound! peacebird Oct 2015 #27
Thanks for assembling all of these articles. LuvNewcastle Oct 2015 #28
You're welcome! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #29
Obama said marriage is a State issue many, many times. I can link if you insist. Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #34
How many here would accuse HC of "pandering" if she had stopped by a picket line today? kelliekat44 Oct 2015 #7
That's easy to counter. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #8
History. It matters. Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #11
Great info on Bernie, workers and unions, thanks. History does matter. appalachiablue Oct 2015 #12
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #10
K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #14
Here is some DOMA history that indicate the state's position's on DOMA...over half in 1993 had state kelliekat44 Oct 2015 #17
At the link is 12 pages of information on DOMA from an academic and historical point of view Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #35

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
4. My recollection was more of a "triangulation"
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 09:14 PM
Oct 2015

Clinton loved to restructure GOP issues and get bills that would be hard for the GOP not to vote for, even if it wasn't particularly popular for democrats. The intent was to "take away" issues from the GOP, get a "win", and move on to another issue.

Her description is a tad more in line with DADT because there was a move afoot to do something much more aggressive. This was a compromise worked out with Powell that ended up being worse than I think Clinton expected.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
5. Sanders himself, just now on Rachel's show, admitted to being against same-sex marriage
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 09:29 PM
Oct 2015

when he was running for Senator of Vermont in 2006. Vermont has had civil unions and support those, but back then they did NOT support same-sex marriage...and but his "evolution" (may have) happened far later sooner than his opponents when President Clinton

From Slate, Monday, 10-05-2015

But Sanders is not quite the gay rights visionary his defenders would like us to believe. Sanders did oppose DOMA—but purely on states’ rights grounds. And as recently as 2006, Sanders opposed marriage equality for his adopted home state of Vermont. The senator may have evolved earlier than his primary opponents. But the fact remains that, in the critical early days of the modern marriage equality movement, Sanders was neutral at best and hostile at worst.

There's even a video at the link where he says "Marriage is a State issue". Um, no. It's not, Bernie. That's a Republican talking point, by the way.

I'm sorry, LiberalArkie, but Bernie Sanders evolved far later than just like his primary opponents on same-sex marriage on marriage equality.

Does it even bother you that in order to justify his stance against same-sex marriage, Sanders used a Republican State's Rights talking point and position?

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
6. lol
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 09:32 PM
Oct 2015

Last edited Mon Oct 26, 2015, 10:05 PM - Edit history (1)

You say he evolved far later than his opponents, yet the article you posted says...

The senator may have evolved earlier than his primary opponents.


Which is it?

And he was never uncomfortable with it or politically strategic about it like Hillary.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/sep/29/chuck-todd/nbcs-chuck-todd-bernie-sanders-there-same-sex-marr/

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
15. That's not what he said in the video. Was his opinion then political expediency in order
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:37 AM
Oct 2015

to get that coveted senate seat? But of course not. He's a man of principle, right?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
16. This is what he said in the 2006 video:
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:44 AM
Oct 2015
I was a strong supporter of civil unions, I believe that. I voted against the DOMA bill, I believe that the federal government should not be involved in overturning Massachusetts or any other the state because I think the whole issue of marriage is a state issue.


Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
30. You have it. In 1979, I was a co-chair for Upstate NY for the planning of the
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:47 AM
Oct 2015

March on Washington for GLBT rights. I still have one of the circulars we used. Then my love and I went back to his rural community to live as openly as we had in the city.l When the DOMA and DADT bullshit came up, we were outraged. To say that he signed because a worse bill would come supposes that no one knows how legislation happens. IF Bill would've had the courage to veto, yes, the Repuke Congress would have passed it over his veto, NOT AN EVEN STRONGER MORE HORRENDOUS BILL. A guy that doesn't have the courage to do that doesn't have the courage to admit he got a freaking blow job. Hillary went along with every bit of it.

Bernie is the only candidate that I have ever been more excited about and in line with the thinking. It's now or never.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
31. I remember being outraged too.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:51 AM
Oct 2015

My dad tried to explain that DADT was a step in the right direction but I served with gay Marines and sailors and it was small consolation.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
19. absolutely
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:39 AM
Oct 2015

and a man of realism.

he knew then that he couldn't, as the only independent get the nation behind marriage for all. he knew some states were more progressive than others and it was more reasonable to allow them all to adjust on their own before going for the big one which would have been impossible in those days.

still, long before Hillary he cared for lgbtq rights and mention of the demographic didn't only come up out of expediency.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
25. Not a counter argument. It was an exasperated response.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:18 AM
Oct 2015
I'm glad we reached the conclusion.

Yes, we have.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
32. Not a matter of "need to believe."
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 08:01 AM
Oct 2015

That is not what I gathered from the post. Or, is that what YOU need to believe? Projection.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
33. Nice! Accusing someone of projection with projection.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 12:23 PM
Oct 2015

But yeah, it's this insatiable "need to believe" that Sanders is actually perfect and above and beyond reproach, saintly even. Sorry, but he's no better than any other politician and will say and do exactly what all other politicians do in order to win an election. He just convinced some people that that's not the case.

There's ample proof that Sanders will change those "principles" if it's no longer politically expedient for him. So in that, he's no different than Hillary Clinton even though his supporters need to believe otherwise.

The HUGE difference between Hillary Clinton and Sanders is, she has the power and the connections to get things done for the American people and Sanders doesn't and never will, because for a man who's been in Congress for 24+ years, he sure doesn't have many friends. But that's what you get when you criticize and excoriate the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party, and then have this illusion that you can win the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. Nobody likes ingrates.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
9. sorry
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 10:08 PM
Oct 2015

your attempt to attack bernie is failure.

he voted against doma,and came out for gay marriage in 2009 while clinton didn't come out for it till 2013.

part of reason he used to say it is state issue was to keep gop for outlawling civil unions.

bernie never said marriage was between one man and one woman as clinton did in 2004 or advise kerry to support balet initivites to ban gay marriage.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
18. I'm not attacking him. Sanders supporters really need to understand
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:04 AM
Oct 2015

that not everything you don't like to hear or read about Sanders written by others is "an attack". It isn't.

he voted against doma,and came out for gay marriage in 2009 while clinton didn't come out for it till 2013.

But it was an evolution. He evolved toward that idea, so it's disingenuous of him to say that when it comes to gay rights, he "was there!" from the get-go.

In May, Sanders famously told New York Times columnist Gail Collins that "I’m not evolving when it comes to gay rights. I was there!"

We know that was, at best, an exaggeration and, at worst, an outright lie, according to his recorded statements which are outlined in this Slate article.

In summary, same-sex marriage is a gay right, and since the OP made an attempt to paint Hillary Clinton as anti-gay rights, I just thought it was my responsibility as a Hillary Clinton supporter to note that Sanders' past position on a gay right (marriage equality) be mentioned here and that, much like Hillary Clinton, he's had to evolve. I felt it was necessary to point that out lest people believe Sanders' past position on marriage equality is pristine and beyond reproach even IF he didn't say that marriage is between a man and a woman - which was, consequently, where the vast majority of Americans were back then.
 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
21. It is neither an exaggeration nor a lie.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:46 AM
Oct 2015

He was fighting for gay rights back in the 70's. He may have changed his position on gay marriage over time, but he was fighting for gay rights when the issue was things like decriminalization, protection from hate attacks and equal rights for the most basic things in society. At that time, basically no-one including gay people were concerned with gay marriage because it seemed like nothing more than a distant dream.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
23. No. It was an exaggeration for political expediency.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:52 AM
Oct 2015

As for his "fighting for gay rights back in the 70's", that's all good and well, but when he finally had the power to actually do something about it rather than talk about it, he bailed.

From that Slate article (which I hope you'll someday read):

Earlier in his political career, Sanders was even more indifferent toward gay rights: As mayor of Burlington in 1990, Sanders told an interviewer that LGBT rights were not a “major priority” for him. Asked if he would support a bill to protect gays from job discrimination, Sanders responded, “probably not.”

Got to hand it to him, though...he talks a good talk.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
26. That "article" was debunked. The blogger lied about the 2006 video and used unsourced quotes.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:20 AM
Oct 2015

Here is proof that he did do something when he could, I hope you'll read it:

32 Years Before Marriage Equality, Bernie Sanders Fought For Gay Rights



But these are only very recent developments. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton may be champions of same-sex marriage now, but you don’t have to go far back to find a time when they weren’t. And hey, we’re happy to have their evolved support.

Not only did Sanders vote against the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, signed into law by then-president Bill Clinton — an unpopular position then — a look back at Sanders’ political career shows consistent support of the gay rights movement. Even when it was more than just unpopular, it was downright controversial.

“In our democratic society, it is the responsibility of government to safeguard civil liberties and civil rights — especially the freedom of speech and expression,” Sanders wrote later in a memo. “In a free society, we must all be committed to the mutual respect of each others lifestyle.”

...

“It is my very strong view that a society which proclaims human freedom as its goal, as the United States does, must work unceasingly to end discrimination against all people. I am happy to say that this past year, in Burlington, we have made some important progress by adopting an ordinance which prohibits discrimination in housing. This law will give legal protection not only to welfare recipients, and families with children, the elderly and the handicapped — but to the gay community as well.”

http://www.queerty.com/32-years-before-marriage-equality-bernie-sanders-fought-for-gay-rights-20150719

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
36. Oh jesus
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 12:50 PM
Oct 2015

your candiate has done absoletly nothing for gay rights.if anyone only talks a good talk it's her.

You can't even quote something accurate.Bernie left office as mayor back in 1989 so he couldn't say anything as mayor in 1990.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
37. Take it up with the author of that piece. A typo? Or a case of "lost in political title translation?
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:25 PM
Oct 2015

He wasn't sworn in as U.S. Rep until 1991, so that means he held the political title of Mayor until that swearing in, which was in 1991. Only then did his political title change. That's how it works in politics. It's why Hillary Clinton's title is no longer Senator but Secretary of State as her last-held political position and until she was confirmed by the Senate. I hope that cleared it up for you.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
13. That is a lie. Here is the transcript from the 2006 video cited by the slate blogger:
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 12:20 AM
Oct 2015

Last edited Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:15 AM - Edit history (1)

I was a strong supporter of civil unions, I believe that. I voted against the DOMA bill, I believe that the federal government should not be involved in overturning Massachusetts or any other the state because I think the whole issue of marriage is a state issue.


No where does Bernie say he opposes same sex marriage, it is obvious that he was referring to not letting the feds overturn states who legalized it.


He was never opposed to same sex marriage in Vermont, he wanted to wait until after the rift healed:

"The state was torn in a way that I had never seen the state torn," Sanders noted of the political climate after Vermont became the first state in the nation to pass civil unions. "My view was, give us a little bit of time."



He proved he supported same sex marriage by voting against DOMA in 1996 and supported lgbt rights long before that:

32 Years Before Marriage Equality, Bernie Sanders Fought For Gay Rights



But these are only very recent developments. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton may be champions of same-sex marriage now, but you don’t have to go far back to find a time when they weren’t. And hey, we’re happy to have their evolved support.

Not only did Sanders vote against the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, signed into law by then-president Bill Clinton — an unpopular position then — a look back at Sanders’ political career shows consistent support of the gay rights movement. Even when it was more than just unpopular, it was downright controversial.

“In our democratic society, it is the responsibility of government to safeguard civil liberties and civil rights — especially the freedom of speech and expression,” Sanders wrote later in a memo. “In a free society, we must all be committed to the mutual respect of each others lifestyle.”

...

“It is my very strong view that a society which proclaims human freedom as its goal, as the United States does, must work unceasingly to end discrimination against all people. I am happy to say that this past year, in Burlington, we have made some important progress by adopting an ordinance which prohibits discrimination in housing. This law will give legal protection not only to welfare recipients, and families with children, the elderly and the handicapped — but to the gay community as well.”

http://www.queerty.com/32-years-before-marriage-equality-bernie-sanders-fought-for-gay-rights-20150719


On LGBT Rights, Bernie Leads and Hillary Follows

Of course, Clinton has since evolved on LGBT rights, as many have. That's wonderful. But the problem is, she only came out in support of marriage equality after it was not politically risky to do so. In fact, by 2013 - the year Clinton announced her full support for marriage equality - Democratic support for same-sex marriage was the norm, not the exception.

On such an important moral issue that affects my life and the lives of thousands of other Americans, making decisions in this manner is rather despicable. Additionally, Clinton's habit of doing what polls deem politically popular is the reason why so many voters find her inauthentic. Now, if Clinton were the only option for the Democratic presidential nomination, I would understand why we should support her despite these flaws.

But she isn't the only option.

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, the longest-serving Independent in the history of Congress, is also running for the nomination. And unlike Clinton, his record on LGBT rights is historically excellent.

Sanders voted against DOMA, one of the few members of Congress to do so, at a time when such a stance was not politically popular. Four years after DOMA passed, Sanders helped champion Vermont's decision in 2000 to become the first state to legalize same-sex civil unions. This set a national precedent for LGBT equality achieved via legislative means. In 2009, when Vermont became the first state to allow marriage equality through legislative action rather than a court ruling, Sanders expressed his support once again. Truly, Sanders has been a real leader on LGBT rights, even if this leadership isn't recognized in the way that Clinton's current support is.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-novak/on-lgbt-rights-bernie-lea_b_7662682.html


Bernie Sanders Was for Full Gay Equality 40 Years Ago

Today’s Supreme Court decision was a monumental moment in American history, as it guaranteed the right for gays and lesbians to get married and established full marriage equality.

Many politicians offered their words of support, including President Obama and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Yet it is important to remember that Obama and Clinton both opposed marriage equality as late as early 2012. It is a testament to the work of thousands of activists over decades that the political class was pulled towards supporting equality.

There is however one prominent politician who did not wait so long to call for full gay equality: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

In a letter he published in the early 1970’s, when he was a candidate for governor of Vermont from the Liberty Union Party, Sanders invoked freedom to call for the abolition of all laws related to homosexuality:


http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/bernie-sanders-was-full-gay-equality-40-years-ago



Sanders: I was ahead of the curve on gay rights

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Saturday he has been waiting for the nation to catch up to his support for same-sex marriage.

Sanders’ remarks come a day after Friday’s landmark 5-4 Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.

He argued he was well ahead of the historic decision, unlike Hillary Clinton, his main rival for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.

...

Sanders at the time served in the House of Representatives, which voted 342-67 in favor of DOMA. The Senate voted 85-14 in favor, before former President Bill Clinton signed it into law.

“That was an anti-gay marriage piece of legislation,” he added of the law that defined marriage at the federal level as the coupling of one man and one woman.

Sanders on Saturday praised Americans for creating greater opportunities for same-sex couples. Friday’s Supreme Court ruling, he charged, was not possible without national pressure for gay rights.

“No one here should think for one second this starts with the Supreme Court,” Sanders said.

“It starts at the grassroots level in all 50 states,” he said. “The American people want to end discrimination in all its forms.”


http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/246370-sanders-i-was-ahead-of-the-curve-on-gay-rights


Bernie Sanders was decades ahead of the country on gay rights and ending the war on drugs

Most Americans now support legally allowing gay and lesbian relationships, same-sex marriage, and personal marijuana use after decades of shifting public opinion. But one Democratic candidate for president, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, was calling for many of these changes decades ago.

In a 1972 letter to a local newspaper — which was recently resurfaced by Chelsea Summers at the New Republic — Sanders wrote that he supported abolishing "all laws dealing with abortion, drugs, sexual behavior (adultery, homosexuality, etc.)" as part of his campaign for Vermont governor:

These stances were far removed from public opinion at the time, according to Gallup surveys on marijuana and gay and lesbian rights. In 1972, 81 percent of Americans said marijuana should be illegal — which suggests even more would favor the prohibition of more dangerous drugs like cocaine and heroin. In 1977, the earliest year of polling data, 43 percent of Americans said gay and lesbian relations between consenting adults should not be legal, while 43 percent said they should be legal.


...

But it took decades for the American public to come around to majority support on these issues: It wasn't until 2013 that a majority of Americans supported marijuana legalization, the early 2000s that most consistently responded in favor of legal gay and lesbian relations, and 2011 that a majority first reported backing same-sex marriage rights.

Sanders has carried many of these positions to this day. He was one of the few federal lawmakers to vote against the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal ban on same-sex marriages, in the 1990s. And while he told Time's Jay Newton-Small in March that he has no current stance on marijuana legalization (but backs medical marijuana), he characterized the war on drugs as costly and destructive.

http://www.vox.com/2015/7/7/8905905/sanders-drugs-gay-rights


Bernie Sanders' Views On Gay Marriage Show He's Been A Supporter For A Long Time

Now that he's officially announced he will seek the Democratic nomination for president and challenge Hillary Clinton, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders will be talking about his positions on major issues on the campaign trail, and one very big issue he has championed for years is gay marriage. Sanders, unlike some of his potential Republican opponents, seems like he would not turn down an invitation to a gay wedding (and he might actually get invited to one).

In 1996, then-Representative Sanders voted against the Defense of Marriage Act, which barred recognition of gay marriage at the federal level (DOMA was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2013). Sanders' and his home state of Vermont were the first to legalize same-sex unions in 2000, at first recognizing them as civil unions. Gay marriage has been legal in Vermont since 2009, and as The New York Times reported, Vermont was the first state to pass legislation in support of same-sex marriage, rather than in reaction to a court ruling.

On Tuesday, as the Supreme Court took up the issue of gay marriage, Sanders issued a statement on his website reaffirming his support, saying gay Americans in every state should be allowed to marry.

Of course all citizens deserve equal rights. It’s time for the Supreme Court to catch up to the American people and legalize gay marriage.

http://www.bustle.com/articles/79951-bernie-sanders-views-on-gay-marriage-show-hes-been-a-supporter-for-a-long-time


Is Bernie Sanders the Most LGBT-Friendly Candidate?

Bernie Sanders, the longest-serving independent member of Congress, is officially seeking the Democratic nomination for president in 2016, the Vermont senator announced in an email to supporters this morning.

"People should not underestimate me," Sanders told the Associated Press in an interview that broke the news of his candidacy Wednesday night. "I've run outside of the two-party system, defeating Democrats and Republicans, taking on big-money candidates and, you know, I think the message that has resonated in Vermont is a message that can resonate all over this country."

The self-described "Democratic socialist" wants to challenge the business-as-usual trend of big money in politics that he says dominates the current candidates — including Hillary Clinton.

The thrust of Sanders's campaign thus far — like his political career as the mayor of Burlington, Vt., 16 years in the U.S. House of Representatives, and the past seven in the U.S. Senate — has focused on supporting working-class Americans through elevated taxes on the wealthy and correcting income inequality "which is now reaching obscene levels," he told the AP.

But Sanders has also been a steadfast and reliable supporter of LGBT equality, supporting the Employment Non-Discrimination Act when it passed the Senate in 2013 and even calling on President Obama to evolve already and support marriage equality in 2011. He's a cosponsor of the federal LGBT-inclusive Student Non-Discrimination Act and has consistently voted against bills seeking to amend the Constitution to ban same-sex marriage, while cosponsoring a bill that would repeal the remaining portions of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. Sanders has a perfect score of 100 percent on the Human Rights Campaign's latest Congressional Equality Index.

http://www.advocate.com/politics/election/2015/04/30/bernie-sanders-most-lgbt-friendly-candidate







Hillary, your candidate, didn't support marriage equality until 2013:

1996: “My preference is that we do all we can to strengthen traditional marriages, and that the people engaged in parenting children be committed to one another and to the child. We also have to be realistic and know there are others who can do a good job, as well, of raising children,” Mrs. Clinton told The San Francisco Examiner.


2000: “Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman,” Mrs. Clinton said while running for the Senate in New York.


2003: “Well, marriage means something different. You know, marriage has a meaning that I think should be kept as it historically has been, but I see no reason whatsoever why people in committed relationships can’t have many of the same rights and the same respect for their unions that they are seeking, and I would like to see that be more accepted than it is,” Mrs. Clinton speaking to WNYC on the difference between gay marriage and civil unions.


2003: “I am, you know, for many reasons. I think that the vast majority of Americans find that to be something they can’t agree with. But I think most Americans are fair. And if they believe that people in committed relationships want to share their lives and, not only that, have the same rights that I do in my marriage, to decide who I want to inherit my property or visit me in a hospital, I think that most Americans would think that that’s fair and that should be done,” Mrs. Clinton, in an interview with CBS, on whether she still opposed same-sex marriage.


2006: “My position is consistent. I support states making the decision. I think that Chuck Schumer would say the same thing. And if anyone ever tried to use our words in any way, we’ll review that. Because I think that it should be in the political process and people make a decision and if our governor and our Legislature support marriage in New York, I’m not going to be against that,” Mrs. Clinton telling Gay City News that she would not block legislation supporting gay marriage in New York.


2007: “I am very much in favor of civil unions with full equality of benefits,” Mrs. Clinton told Ellen DeGeneres, explaining that she still believed the decision should be left to states.


...

2013: “L.G.B.T. Americans are our colleagues, our teachers, our soldiers, our friends, our loved ones, and they are full and equal citizens and deserve the rights of citizenship. That includes marriage,” Mrs. Clinton said in a video released by Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group.


http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/04/16/hillary-clintons-changing-views-on-gay-marriage/



She even opposed it for her own state:


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
29. You're welcome!
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:40 AM
Oct 2015

They've been attacking Bernie for months so I have dozens of bookmarks on different topics.

When I finally put them all together in one post I bookmark that.

Makes it easy!


 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
7. How many here would accuse HC of "pandering" if she had stopped by a picket line today?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 09:35 PM
Oct 2015

There is such a double standard by BS supporters. Watch Bernie from here on out. His methods will be ones for which HC would be criticized.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
8. That's easy to counter.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 09:46 PM
Oct 2015

One candidate has a history of pandering for political expediency and the other candidate has a history of fighting for his convictions which benefit the 99%.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
11. History. It matters.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 11:09 PM
Oct 2015

From 2010
http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/6770/bernie_filibusters_not_just_on_the_senate_floor_but_on_picket_lines

Sanders has always used the power of elected office to protect workers during union organizing drives, which often involve illegal firings of union activists. Sanders is known for coming to the union halls during union elections and urging workers to join a union. He has called up Vermont employers and threaten to shame them if they engage in illegal firings and management intimidation tactics, which often goes unpunished in the United States due to weak labor laws.

….

Most Democratic elected officials are reluctant to get involved in union organizing drives in the ways that Sanders does. If they do get involved, it's only symbolic. Few make the repeated, intense efforts that Sanders does to threaten to use the powers of the full powers a Senator has to threaten a company into having a free and fair elections and contract negotiations.


I know this from personal experience while organizing government contractors that worked for Northup Grumman and a number of other contractors for the United States Customs and Immigration Services (UCSIS). In 2008, I was helping organize workers employed at a USCIS Center in California, while another group from the same union was helping organize workers in Vermont. We got very little help from Democratic elected officials in California.

However, Sen. Sanders repeatedly called and wrote the CEOs of these government contractors whenever reports of worker intimidation emerged.
Sanders even showed up at a union hall in Vermont and told workers that if he worked where they did he would vote for a union. As a result of Sanders' persistent help, we successfully won four separate NLRB elections and were able to reach a first contact within four months (a record in first-contract negotiations). Without Sanders' help, I don't think we would have been successful.

appalachiablue

(41,127 posts)
12. Great info on Bernie, workers and unions, thanks. History does matter.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 11:42 PM
Oct 2015

K & R Important thread, thanks Liberal Arkie.

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
17. Here is some DOMA history that indicate the state's position's on DOMA...over half in 1993 had state
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:50 AM
Oct 2015

amendments banning same sex marriage. You judge

http://www.pewforum.org/2009/07/09/a-contentious-debate-same-sex-marriage-in-the-us/

Pew research

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
35. At the link is 12 pages of information on DOMA from an academic and historical point of view
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 12:45 PM
Oct 2015

That is it is not out to grind axes but to record the events. To be blunt with you, Bernie and a few who lived the times being LGBT have a good grip on the whole thing, Hillary and most supporters of both candidates are a tad muddled. Hillary recalls correctly that some offered an amendment as excuse for voting for DOMA but forgets that it was just an excuse and that many others did not agree with such a tactic at all. Not just Bernie but great Democrats like Ted Kennedy voted against DOMA for the right reasons, they did not make self serving excuses only mildly connected to reality.

Some say they would not have tried for an amendment without DOMA and some say DOMA stopped them trying for an amendment but in reality the Republicans kept pushing for an amendment after DOMA, so they did try and DOMA did not stop them, making two sides of DU's argument about it both equally wrong.....

http://www.glbtqarchive.com/ssh/defense_of_marriage_act_S.pdf

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sorry, Hillary, Gay Right...