2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Hits Opponent Hard on Guns
Bernie Sanders Walks A Fine Line On Gun ControlNPR
JUNE 24, 2015
What a crazy gun nut! Guns aren't a part of anyone's culture.
Clinton touts her experience with guns
CNN
April 12th, 2008
I disagree with Sen. Obamas assertion that people in our country cling to guns and have certain attitudes about trade and immigration simply out of frustration, she began, referring to the Obama comments on small-town Americans that set off a political tumult on Friday.
She then introduced a fond memory from her youth.
You know, my dad took me out behind the cottage that my grandfather built on a little lake called Lake Winola outside of Scranton and taught me how to shoot when I was a little girl, she said.
You know, some people now continue to teach their children and their grandchildren. Its part of culture. Its part of a way of life. People enjoy hunting and shooting because its an important part of who they are. Not because they are bitter.
Wait, what? Guns are a part of who people are? I guess that's not different from what Bernie said.
In Post-Debate Push, Hillary Clinton Highlights Gun Divide With Bernie Sanders
ABC News
Oct 17, 2015
Well, I think we have to keep talking about it, she continued. But more importantly, we have to act.
Later on Friday, in an interview with CNN, Clinton was asked if she was intentionally positioning herself to advance on Sanders.
I dont think Ive moved at all, she said. I have been the same person. I have the same values. I have the same principles I'm sure we had some memo somewhere pointing out things that we tried to go after. But that's politics. I get it.
This is how people get whiplash. OK, Clinton definitely against the guns, has always been consistent, not changing her story for political purposes. Got it.
Hillary Clinton Penchant for Expediency Leading to Repeat of 2008 Downfall
Observer
09/21/15
That Time Hillary Clintons Campaign Attacked Obama In 2008 For Flip-Flopping On Guns
Buzzfeed
Oct. 12, 2015
What does Barack Obama really believe? a mail ad from Hillary Clintons 2008 presidential campaign asked of her Democratic primary opponents position on guns.
The mailer attacked Obama for firstaccording to the adtelling a group in Chicago he supported a ban on handguns. The ad references a candidate questionnaire from 1996, when Obama was running for State Senate, in which he was listed as supporting a ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of handguns. It then notes he told an Idaho crowd that he supported the Second Amendment and finally hits him for a comment he made about about people in small towns in Pennsylvania who cling to guns or religion.
The campaign sent out the mailer in May, a month after Clinton called Obamas cling to guns remark elitist, saying that guns were part of culture, and telling the story of how her father taught her to shoot in her childhood. Obama shot back, accusing her of talking like shes Annie Oakley.
Ok, so to recap, Mrs. Clinton is to the left of Sanders on guns ... and to the right of Obama. I guess politics is like quantum physics, you can end up on every side of every issue.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)I think he has some kind of emotional instability.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)They will likely alert on this.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)It's my opinion.
Major Nikon
(36,814 posts)On Mon Oct 26, 2015, 11:07 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Bernie Sanders is such a pandering phony braggart.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=730857
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Saying a Democratic candidate has an "emotional instability" is offensive and over the top.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Oct 26, 2015, 11:16 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Deliberate attempt at insulting a candidate and supporters.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is a new low for HRC supporters. Hide as it violates CS.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If someone is offended by this it makes you wonder how they ever get out of the door.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: We all know better.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
PatrickforO
(14,516 posts)It's her opinion and she's entitled to it. I, however, have a different opinion, to which I also am entitled. It is stated in my post below.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)mental illness to go after him. How sad. But then remember Rahm Emmanuel also used mental illness to go after the Left. He was forced to apologize for the use of the word 'retarded' however he never apologized to the Left.
And once again, as it often does, the Left turned out to be RIGHT about Gen. Petraeus. Someone should ask him now what he thinks of what Moveon correctly called him back then that set poor Rahm off to the point of lashing out at those who turned out to be right.
PatrickforO
(14,516 posts)The funny thing is that I don't really hold Petraeus responsible. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld - those are the war criminals. Damn I wish Obama would have put those assholes on trial!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Cheney for the tragic invasion of Iraq. However, Petraeus did violate security rules and there was a lot more that was just coming out, when the whole thing was put to rest. I blame him for his own irresponsible behavior and all those who VOTED for the lies and deceptions among so many others who facilitated the war criminals in their pursuit of that War for Profit.
Chelsea Manning is in jail for 35 years for supposedly violating security. Petraeus should have been held to a far higher standard than someone like Manning.
PatrickforO
(14,516 posts)I do not think she is a traitor.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)According to Hillary supporters on DU Bernie is Israel's #1 shill, a racist, gun nut, scheming little sneak, pandering phony braggart withsome kind of emotional instability, tool for the NRA, Republican man with his head between women's legs, who protects the minutemen militia, pedophiles, racist cops, has rape fantasies and thinks that orgasms prevent cancer.
Whenever someone complains about how Hillary is vilified here show them that list.
That is how they treat the progressive Senator from Vermont who fought for our rights for decades and was a DU darling before he challenged Hillary.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)cancer! Lol!
That's quite a picture .... of SOMEONE!
DU cracks me up! I come here now just for the entertainment. I used to come to learn things.
Good you added the latest smear. We have to keep track of all this.
Our political system is so polluted.
Bernie is a breath of fresh air!
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
PatrickforO
(14,516 posts)The primary issue is wealth inequality, followed closely by global warming. Or some would have them the other way around, which is fine. But we've got to get health care, strengthen social security, start massive infrastructure projects moving us aggressively toward renewable energy sources, fix the corporate tax code so these multi nationals pay their fair share of US income tax, boost the tax on high wage earners, tax capital gains as regular income, impose a transaction tax on Wall Street, reinstate Glass-Steagall, provide free tuition at state colleges and universities, de-privatize prisons and tone down military spending.
Those are the things I would put ahead of gun control and I'll tell you why: They would make more Americans happier and less stressed. Certain psychological experiments with rats have suggested that rats that are happier and less stressed are less violent to one another, and I see no reason not to extend this supposition to the American people. Less stress plus more economic security equals less gun violence.
But to be fair, this IS the ONLY issue on which Clinton beats Sanders. I will concede that relatively minor point.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)if she pursues this issue. And she won't get any crossover votes.
I'm fine with her trying this though, since I support Sanders and everything that helps him, is good with me.
Ino
(3,366 posts)She thinks Sanders' gun position is a weak point given the mass shootings, so she takes the opposite view.
His positions that are very popular, she experiences a just-in-time conversion & pretends she always believed the same.
She has no integrity.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)on guns will 'evolve' probably to Bernie's position. Because you can't win the GE with just part of the base of the Dem party, which now makes up only 32% of the electorate.
You need crossover votes to win. Bernie already has that, he is attracting Republicans, Libertarians and of course Independents who now are the largest registered voting bloc in the country.
She simply cannot go after Sanders on much of anything, his record is that good. Someone told her that THIS is one issue where she might have an advantage.
However,, they are ignoring the fact that many Democrats are gun owners and are just as concerned about their rights to own guns as are the rest of the population.
She's wrong a lot, so this is no surprise.