2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOMG: Trump is coming out against Super PACs and for campaign finance reform
Will Hillary?
That's the big question. If Trump is taking a hard stance in alignment with the left, on one of the most important issues in our Democracy, then Hillary must give up her Super PAC or she is going to be left behind on this issue.
I don't see how Hillary can justify using more money from her Super PAC than Sanders has raised when you have the leading candidate on the right saying what everyone at DU has said for decades now: It's Wrong.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)If she gets her money from Super Pacs like Emily's List and Ready for Hillary, or anyone else, why would I care?
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Ever hear of Citizens United?
And the fact that you care more about winning makes you sound like a Trump supporter more than a Democrat.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)And I don't give a shit what you think, period.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)I guess that is the answer.
I am trying to understand how this isn't a cult of personality.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)The poor and the wealthy. If we continue to elect republicans and corporate dems, we will reside in a peasant state.
Broward
(1,976 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Amazing how short people's memory is.
He's been for campaign finance reform and a wealth surtax since the 1990s.
brush
(53,738 posts)that align with the left, that conflict with his crazy righty stances.
He's a paradox who can win some dem votes.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's exactly right. We underestimate him at our own peril.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Somehow I don't think she'll do squat about it.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)By the way, she's not "taking" money from SuperPACs. There are SuperPACs supporting her. You should probably inform yourself as to how it all works.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)There are two candidates not "taking" money from SuperPACs.