2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMassive HillaryQuake Hits Iowa.
Nationwide aftershocks expected this week.
The earthshaking results of two Iowa polls hit hard this morning, shaking up the campaign ground in Iowa and threatening the destruction of the Sanders home team. National polling result aftershocks have begun to come in, as well, with more aftershocks expected today and tomorrow.
The United States Electional Survey recommends that people living in a house of cards seek better shelter to avoid painful injuries to their emotional bases.
Updates on future tremors will be reported as they become available.
JohnnyLib2
(11,211 posts)Good one!
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)We're so damn stupid.
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)in a wasteland of stupidity, I guess, so just stay put and celebrate that. I don't know of any place on this planet that doesn't have a similar distribution of the population by intelligence, really. Wherever you go, there you are.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)in packing up, moving and starting over. I know, at 70, my interest in doing such a thing approaches zero, even if it were just across the city.
I moved from California to Minnesota at age 59 and swore I'd never do it again once the move was complete. Massive stress as a life event is what moving represents.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Much smarter than GOPers that's for sure.
Why so down?
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)Things will likely have to get worse still before they get better.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)#HillaryQuake
pinebox
(5,761 posts)as CNN and MSNBC said earlier on the air.
When you look at the demographics polled, it makes sense.
Also, this.
http://www.latinpost.com/articles/89852/20151026/iowa-polls-2016-bernie-sanders-overwhelmingly-favored-millennials.htm
In the swing state of Iowa, the first to hold primary elections in the form of caucuses, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., appears to be the favorite among the largest U.S. age demographic to win the Democratic Partys presidential nomination.
Millennials, identified as Americans born between 1980 and mid-2000s, who represent one-third of the total U.S. population, overwhelmingly favored Sanders in polling data by CBS News and YouGov.
In the YouGov and CBS News survey, millennials, found in the 18-to-29-year-old age group, were most likely to vote for Sanders at 76 percent. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton significantly trailed the Vermont senator by 55 percentage points. Clinton received 21 percent of the millennials' vote. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley was the only other Democratic candidate to receive support at 3 percent.
The poll was conducted when Jim Webb, Lincoln Chafee and Vice President Joe Biden were still considered likely contenders for the Democrat's nomination, but the three men received 0 percent.
When CBS News and YouGov polled millennials in a hypothetical Democratic presidential caucus questionnaire without Biden as an option, Sanders and Clinton received the same percentages.
Within the GOP field, Republican millennials showed that their caucus could end with a narrow result. Donald Trump received 26 percent, ahead of 22 percent for Ben Carson and 20 percent for Ted Cruz. All other Republican candidates received single-digit figures or 0 percent.
Although Marco Rubio received 6 percent support from Republican millennials, 62 percent said they would be "satisfied" if he wins the Republican nomination, while 23 percent would not be satisfied.
Among the four age groups identified in the poll, millennials were the most likely to vote in the 2016 Iowa presidential caucus with 84 percent stating they "definitely" or "probably will" vote. The 65-and-older age group showed the second-highest engagement rate with 77 percent, higher than the 30-to-44 and 45-to-64 age groups.
Regardless of political party affiliation, more millennials, at 62 percent, agreed they are "enthusiastic" about their first-choice candidate than the other age groups.
MADem
(135,425 posts)http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-clinton-leads-sanders-by-41-points-in-iowa/
Poll: Hillary Clinton leads Bernie Sanders by 41 points in Iowa
According to a new Monmouth University Poll, Clinton earns 65 percent of the vote from likely Democratic caucus-goers to Sanders' 24 percent. Martin O'Malley gets 5 percent and Larry Lessig, who is not often included in early state polls, gets 1 percent.
"We now have a two-person race, but one of those competitors has just pulled very far ahead," said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, in the poll's release.
The poll conducted between October 22 and 24, is the first poll that captures Democratic caucus-goers' opinions after Clinton's appearance before the Select House Committee on Benghazi last week. The marathon day of testimony, which lasted 11 hours, was largely seen as a victory for Clinton over a committee divided on party lines and mired with controversy.
Her performance on Capitol Hill, along with a commanding presence on the debate stage the week before, had Clinton and her supporters on a high as she headed to Iowa over the weekend for the state party's annual Jefferson-Jackson Dinner....
riversedge
(70,082 posts)ALSO new Loras College poll finds Clinton leading Sanders, 65% to 24%, with OMalley at 3% http://politicalwire.com/2015/10/27/clinton-holds-massive-lead-in-iowa/ #Hillary16
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I did catch up and I read the GD-P thread in which both polls use the same source XD
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)A whole lotta shaking goin on this morning MineralMan
riversedge
(70,082 posts)poll. Now with this afternoon's poll, I am sure she is scrapping herself off the floor. Still laughing about her expression from this am.
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)Not one of these Iowa ones? If so, I haven't seen it yet.
riversedge
(70,082 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)I'm watching for the first of many national polls taken since the Benghazi hearing and Biden's announcement. Those will be very interesting. I expected to see a couple today, but so far, none have shown up.
riversedge
(70,082 posts)riversedge
(70,082 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)the interwebs, I think.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)+100
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)long be fore Sanders came. Hillary has a good ground game here and doesn't rely on an internet brigade.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)You always respond to my jokes, and I appreciate that. Really, I do.
DFW
(54,281 posts)This is going to be anything but a typical primary campaign, and Bernie's supporters were just as jubilant when it looked like he was leading in Iowa.
Both camps could do well to remember that things could shift a few more times before the caucus. I'd be willing to bet the Sanders campaign remembers Howard Dean's attempt in 2003/2004, and is plenty determined to be more than just an "internet phenomenon." Neither candidate is a shoo-in (or, "shoe-in," as I have seen posted here--I promise I did not make that up!), and I don't find that a bad thing. Nothing like a little teeth-sharpening to prepare for the general. Don't get me wrong, I say the Democratic nominee wins as things look now, whoever it is. But the coattails will be a vital factor in the make-up of Congress for the first two years, and THAT will determine if the new president come in with any kind of wind in his/her sails.
coyote
(1,561 posts)Today, 5 days later, she is polling 41 points...that is is a 34 point gain in 5 days. I love the smell of bullshit in the morning. And Carson is the republican front runner too.
riversedge
(70,082 posts)Hillary for Iowa Retweeted
guerrero ?@eguerrero91 Oct 24
I'm proud to be a Democrat! #hillaryforIA #hillary2016