Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Riddle me this. (Original Post) MoonRiver Oct 2015 OP
Oo, pick me! Pick me! valerief Oct 2015 #1
And he was, supposedly, anti-war. My, oh, my those oligarchs sure are flip floppers! MoonRiver Oct 2015 #2
Well, what he told us wasn't what he told the PTB. Politics, you know. nt valerief Oct 2015 #8
And why did Obama win, I mean surely the oligarchs treestar Oct 2015 #3
Seriously! MoonRiver Oct 2015 #4
Beyond that, a HUGE fail for $$$$ in politics Capn Sunshine Oct 2015 #28
K and r. cwydro Oct 2015 #5
I dunno. If she's so inevitable, why does her team here keep bad-mouthing Sanders and his Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #6
Well, I, for one, never said or thought she was inevitable. MoonRiver Oct 2015 #10
I agree that there has been some OTT rhetoric from both sides. Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #15
+100 ^ This^ nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #23
It would be nice if both sides could stop demonizing the other. But I've been here long enough onenote Oct 2015 #30
Unless one thinks a little longer and doesn't really want those Sanders voters for Clinton. valerief Oct 2015 #11
A thread titled "SANDERS OR BUST" got almost 200 recs a few days ago..... Cali_Democrat Oct 2015 #13
I've already expressed my opinion of anyone who doesn't support the nominee in the general. Warren DeMontague Oct 2015 #16
The oligarch's money is extremely powerful GummyBearz Oct 2015 #7
Answer to the riddle is that oligarchs don't want Hillary or any other Democrat. MoonRiver Oct 2015 #12
50% GummyBearz Oct 2015 #14
If she's elected it will be because the people won, MoonRiver Oct 2015 #17
She is the cloest thing to a comprimise goldman sachs and the other oligarchs are willing to bet on GummyBearz Oct 2015 #18
Your opinion, big time. MoonRiver Oct 2015 #19
No GummyBearz Oct 2015 #21
Tactical errors brooklynite Oct 2015 #9
Yea her campaign v. Axelrod & Plough underpants Oct 2015 #27
IMO, the party hiearchy pulled the rug out from under her feet. CentralMass Oct 2015 #20
However you want to rationalize it, fact remains that Bernie has had a fair shot at her, MoonRiver Oct 2015 #22
My voting choices tend to be wrong . I supported CentralMass Oct 2015 #24
See, I appreciate that polite and reasonable statement. MoonRiver Oct 2015 #25
2015 minus 2008. elleng Oct 2015 #26
She claimed to have run from snipers and wouldn't back down from it Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #29
My first choice in 2008 was John Edwards because I felt he was the best chance for getting liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #31

treestar

(82,383 posts)
3. And why did Obama win, I mean surely the oligarchs
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:01 PM
Oct 2015

preferred Rmney and McCain before that - how did the oligarchs fail? That was massive fail.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
28. Beyond that, a HUGE fail for $$$$ in politics
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:03 PM
Oct 2015

Hundreds of millions, maybe billions, were spent by the evil billionaires. With zero return on investment.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
6. I dunno. If she's so inevitable, why does her team here keep bad-mouthing Sanders and his
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:04 PM
Oct 2015

supporters?

One would think they might figure out that come general election time, they're probably going to want all those Sanders votes. Dare I say, maybe even need.

One would think.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
10. Well, I, for one, never said or thought she was inevitable.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:07 PM
Oct 2015

And the same can be said for the Sanders' supporters who constantly demonize Hillary. Works both ways.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
15. I agree that there has been some OTT rhetoric from both sides.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:14 PM
Oct 2015

But it doesn't really work both ways, to my mind, because at this point I give her pretty good odds of clinching the thing.

I say that as someone who is voting for Sanders in my likely inconsequential state primary, but also someone who I think has a pretty good handle on political realism. I must be more confident than some of her supporters, who still seem to be hiding under the bed with panic that it will be snatched away at the last minute again, like it was 8 years ago. When you are fairly confident that your candidate is going to win, you start thinking about ways to build the necessary coalitions to achieve general election victory.

Yowling at Sanders and his supporters, for instance, over imaginary misogyny because he used the word "shouting" is not the behavior of people who are reasonably confident about their chances, much less their ability to sustain a case based upon actual policy issues.

onenote

(42,585 posts)
30. It would be nice if both sides could stop demonizing the other. But I've been here long enough
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:18 PM
Oct 2015

to know there is no chance of that happening any time soon.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
11. Unless one thinks a little longer and doesn't really want those Sanders voters for Clinton.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:09 PM
Oct 2015

Like a tactic of maybe a GOP operative.

I think I'll trash this thread now.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
13. A thread titled "SANDERS OR BUST" got almost 200 recs a few days ago.....
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:11 PM
Oct 2015

Many of them have already said they won't vote for Hillary.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
16. I've already expressed my opinion of anyone who doesn't support the nominee in the general.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:16 PM
Oct 2015

I feel no need to repeat myself endlessly on that topic.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
7. The oligarch's money is extremely powerful
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:05 PM
Oct 2015

But the people over came. If repugs steal elections every time, how did Obama win in 2008? Riddle me that

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
12. Answer to the riddle is that oligarchs don't want Hillary or any other Democrat.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:09 PM
Oct 2015

And yeah, sometimes the people win. That's what will have happened when Hillary is elected president.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
14. 50%
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:14 PM
Oct 2015

You got the first half right... I am still laughing over the claim that Hillary being elected means the people win.... thats a damn good one liner

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
17. If she's elected it will be because the people won,
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:16 PM
Oct 2015

i.e. they got the candidate the majority voted for.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
18. She is the cloest thing to a comprimise goldman sachs and the other oligarchs are willing to bet on
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:18 PM
Oct 2015

that doesn't mean "the people win" ..

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
21. No
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:20 PM
Oct 2015

Just look at the donations. The big banks are big hillary super pac funders. She is their compromise.

brooklynite

(94,333 posts)
9. Tactical errors
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:06 PM
Oct 2015

1) overspending in the early phase of the campaign, in anticipation of winning by Super Tuesday

2) lack of appreciation of the ability to rack up large shares of delegates in Caucus states.

underpants

(182,604 posts)
27. Yea her campaign v. Axelrod & Plough
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:01 PM
Oct 2015

Her campaign was staking out their post election careers. Obama's campaign was top notch (I worked on the local level) from the databases to their geek squad to harnessing the energy of their base.

He shocked the political world with his first fundraising numbers, got his shoulders in front like a foot race, and kept her at bay at the finish. It was still close...until the Kennedys endorsed him and then it was over.

CentralMass

(15,265 posts)
20. IMO, the party hiearchy pulled the rug out from under her feet.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:19 PM
Oct 2015

Networks like MSNBC were down right hostile to her. Chris Matthews was foaming at the mouth leveling attacks on her.
Both Clinton's were said to have played the race card. The likescof the late great Tim Russert even put that one out there. It's interesting that Jesse Jackson himself was not offended by Bill's comments in South Carolina

However, the party has greased the skids for her this time. Reason enough not to pick her in the primary.

Go Bernie.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
22. However you want to rationalize it, fact remains that Bernie has had a fair shot at her,
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:24 PM
Oct 2015

and he's not even close. This has nothing to do with oligarchs, and everything to do with the will of Democratic voters.

CentralMass

(15,265 posts)
24. My voting choices tend to be wrong . I supported
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:32 PM
Oct 2015

Hillary in 2008. However Bernie Sanders is the clear cut choice for me this election.
I attended the Portland rally. I witnessed the euthusiasm of the 28k people who attended. This one is not over until the votes are counted.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
25. See, I appreciate that polite and reasonable statement.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 05:39 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie is a good guy who does attract big crowds. We all like our candidates, and it would be nice if that could be respected.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
29. She claimed to have run from snipers and wouldn't back down from it
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:16 PM
Oct 2015

for weeks.

No amount of money could clean that one up. If she does something similar after winning the nomination we are all screwed.

Terrible candidate. Not worth the risk.



liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
31. My first choice in 2008 was John Edwards because I felt he was the best chance for getting
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:28 PM
Oct 2015

real help for the poor. After his debacle I didn't know a lot about Obama and knew that Hillary had fought for special education in the past. I figured if I can't vote for John Edwards I would rather have Hillary in the White House than a Republican. I was talked out of voting for her at the caucus. That was my first caucus and I didn't really understand what was happening. I feel like I had been coerced and bullied. But they kept saying that Hillary was not electable and that Obama would bring about real change, so I voted for Obama. Times have changed since then and so have I. I will no longer just vote for who is supposedly more electable and I will not be cohered into voting for anybody except who I want to vote for at the caucus or on political websites.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Riddle me this.