Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,595 posts)
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 11:15 PM Sep 2012

"Romney cedes Ohio TV airwaves to Obama (at least for now)" by Michael Finnegan at the LA Times

Romney cedes Ohio TV airwaves to Obama (at least for now)

By Michael Finnegan at the LA Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-obama-ohio-ads-20120906,0,4157574.story

"SNIP.....................................

The sudden cease-fire offered a surprising lull in what for months had been a guns-blazing advertising war waged in Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Nevada, Colorado, Iowa and New Hampshire — on one side, Romney and his allies; on the other, the president and his.

It had continued unabated during the Republican National Convention last week, with no letup from the Obama forces.

But Romney’s temporary withdrawal has been striking here in northern Ohio, where what had looked to TV viewers for months like an evenly matched, if annoying, ad battle transformed into a lopsided all-Obama/all-the-time promotion campaign, with news coverage of the Democratic National Convention amplifying the president’s message.

The Romney vacuum was especially noteworthy given that early voting in Ohio starts in less than four weeks.

......................................SNIP"
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Romney cedes Ohio TV airwaves to Obama (at least for now)" by Michael Finnegan at the LA Times (Original Post) applegrove Sep 2012 OP
This is suspicious Sedona Sep 2012 #1
PACs will pick up the gap 10 fold. liberal N proud Sep 2012 #2
Or maybe Romney might just lose Ohio Floyd_Gondolli Sep 2012 #3
This amounts to conceding the election abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #4
Exactly. This can't be more than a teporary retreat. BlueStreak Sep 2012 #7
I think it's the auto bailout. abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #10
That would make sense -- and also explain WI and MI BlueStreak Sep 2012 #11
That's a wall street point abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #12
I don't really agree with that BlueStreak Sep 2012 #14
How long until he cedes the other 49? RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #5
That what I thought. He must be retooling his message or something. applegrove Sep 2012 #6
I think that's right. It is a pause for retooling - but there is a real danger for Romney BlueStreak Sep 2012 #9
I wish it were true. I live in Ohio and tonight the adds were there during the evening news N/T PuppyBismark Sep 2012 #8
Fox News abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #13
The public is tired of political ads, less and very,very short and positive is more. Sunlei Sep 2012 #15
Out of Michigan and Pennsylvania too Sedona Sep 2012 #16
Caution mojo2012 Sep 2012 #17

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
2. PACs will pick up the gap 10 fold.
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 11:18 PM
Sep 2012

Or Romney may see ads in Ohio a waste. A waste because the have the fix already in place.

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
3. Or maybe Romney might just lose Ohio
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 11:24 PM
Sep 2012

Like McCain before him. I know it sounds ludicrous but it seems fair to include it in the list of possible scenarios in Ohio.

abumbyanyothername

(2,711 posts)
4. This amounts to conceding the election
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 11:25 PM
Sep 2012

or adopting a completely different path.

But they cannot win the EC without Ohio.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
7. Exactly. This can't be more than a teporary retreat.
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 11:40 PM
Sep 2012

There is absolutely no path to 270 if they concede OH in addition to WI, MI, and PA.

The whole thing is probably connected with the strange decision to not do any serious campaigning this week.

One interpretation is that the DNC is sucking up all the oxygen and any ad spend (or campaign events) in the next day or two might be wasted. They also might want to take a day or two to assess what has just hit them. This was not a bunch of drunks chasing hookers in Charlotte. This was a heavy, heavy, serious attack. Maybe our electorate is so divided that it won't actually move the numbers at all. But maybe their private polling is showing that the cumulative effect of:

- lies
- a lousy VP choice
- a nasty, mean-spirited RNC where Romney's name barely came up
- lies
- a RNC where they presented no specifics
- lies
- their intentions to kill Medicare and Social Security

are catching up to them. If they've seen a big shift in their polling, they may be calling a time out to try to see where they can go from here. But they most certainly cannot write off Ohio.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
11. That would make sense -- and also explain WI and MI
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 12:03 AM
Sep 2012

They may feel their current batch of ads don't work in OH, MI, and WI, and they may be trying to figure out an effective way to counter that.

Romney has tried to argue that when he said "Let Detroit go bankrupt" what was a technical term. He was really saying "save Detroit by taking them through a managed bankruptcy." That actually could be an effective response, except for the fact that a managed bankruptcy requires somebody to step up with capital, and nobody stepped up. That was my biggest disappoint with the DNC, which on the whole was a great production. But why is nobody pushing the central issue about the GM bailout. That is actually quite easy to make:

I didn't want the government to have an ownership stake in GM. As president, I didn't want to be in the car business. There are so many other things that needed the president's attention. But the consequences of losing over a million jobs -- losing an entire industry would have been disastrous. If we could have facilitated a managed bankruptcy with private equity companies, we would have done that. But the banking system was so fouled up by that moment that no private equity companies would touch that with a 10-foot pole. Where was KKR? Where was Blackstone? Why didn't they come to the table with some money? And for all Governor Romney's Monday-morning quarterbacking, I don't recall Bain Capital offering to help out here. So we were left with no option. Either the government had to be the lender of last resort or else GM and Chrysler would disappear ...


There is still time for the Obama campaign to make that point, of course, but I was disappointed they didn't do it at the DNC when they had the best opportunity.

abumbyanyothername

(2,711 posts)
12. That's a wall street point
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 12:08 AM
Sep 2012

They are playing this one to main street.

Not to minimize your point. And in fact, I have some friends on the fence who I will try it on -- since they are a private equity family. I think the personal tax consequences are too much for them to swallow, but they are social liberals.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
14. I don't really agree with that
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:18 AM
Sep 2012

The Republican point is to call this "Government Motors". The only Dem response has been to say "it saved 1.1 million jobs"

That is not an adequate response -- or at least not one that fully takes credit for the issue. Romney argues that the government shouldn't be involved, that it would have sorted itself out through this thing he calls a "managed bankruptcy".

I believe it is really necessary to explain, the issue was capital -- money needed to carry on the business. Banks were not lending, and the private equity firms like Bain were running the other way. It really was a simple as "either the government steps in or else the whole industry would disappear (at least GM and Chrysler)."

And the advantage of taking that extra 30 seconds to explain capital is that it throws it back on Bain. "If Gov. Romney thinks it should have been a private solution, then where was Bain? Why didn't Bain step up to help out? He talks big now, but where was he when in counted?"

The other response that Dems seem to miss out on is some of that arithmetic Clinton talks about. The government came in and bought stock in the restructured GM. And we gave Chrysler a loan. That is how we saved those companies. The Chrysler loan was fully repaid as they merged with Fiat, so that is clearly a big win for everybody. And in the case of GM, we have already sold much of the stock. We still hold some stock. It is true that when we sell the remaining GM stock, the taxpayers will realize a loss of about $20 billion. #1, that is a tiny fraction of the losses we suffered in bailing out Wall Street. #2, saving over a million jobs is worth way more than $20 billion.

Arithmetic!!! Just think of what it would have cost the taxpayers if those million workers stopped paying taxes, started drawing unemployment, food stamps and other assistance. That would have been hundreds of billions of dollars. This is the best possible deal for the taxpayers

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
5. How long until he cedes the other 49?
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 11:26 PM
Sep 2012

Check that, I think he ceded the election. He can't win without Ohio.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
9. I think that's right. It is a pause for retooling - but there is a real danger for Romney
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 11:43 PM
Sep 2012

With all these stories of him pulling the plug on this state or that state, this begins to look like a campaign in crisis. And when there is blood in the water, that's when the MSM starts to jump in to amplify that.

abumbyanyothername

(2,711 posts)
13. Fox News
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 12:40 AM
Sep 2012

Watching a bit of Greta.

Sounds a bit like they're about ready to give it up over there. They were talking about the Latino vote.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
15. The public is tired of political ads, less and very,very short and positive is more.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:28 AM
Sep 2012

Short ads, positive ads remind people where and when to vote. Thank them for their vote and voting early. A running count of early votes received?

Sedona

(3,769 posts)
16. Out of Michigan and Pennsylvania too
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:36 AM
Sep 2012

reported on Stephanie Miller moments ago!

The PAC money is gone too?

Too good to be true?

mojo2012

(290 posts)
17. Caution
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:48 AM
Sep 2012

No way do I think they've given up. I think something is being plotted. I wouldn't be surprised if they were watching for any holes during the DNC that they could capitalize on.

They haven't run out of money. I think they are going to hit hard with every dollar (a lot of it) they have and fill the airways EVERYWHERE with their false ads during the last two weeks before the election. Money is no object, what's another million or two each from their rich buddies and corporations. I think there's something going on and we all have to be ready to be on the attack.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Romney cedes Ohio T...