Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
1. No, that is clearly wrong.
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 08:46 AM
Dec 2014

Last edited Wed Dec 17, 2014, 10:59 AM - Edit history (1)

I've read on here that 235% of Democrats want her for president. And those people clearly have no agenda or reason to pick and choose their polls.

Just get on board.

Edited to add:

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
2. Link to thread that says 235% of Dems want Hillary?
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 08:58 AM
Dec 2014

I am a Hillary supporter who does want a primary and I have never read that 235% of Dems are Hillary supporters. I have seen polls that suggests she beats all potential GOP candidates by almost double digits.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
3. It was sarcasm
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 09:33 AM
Dec 2014

You do realize that 235% in the case of polling cannot be an actual number, right?

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
5. The sarcasm was a knock at their inevitability claims, yes.
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 10:18 AM
Dec 2014

I don't think I tried to disguise that.

rock

(13,218 posts)
6. The rule and it's been stated before on DU
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 10:45 AM
Dec 2014

Is use the SARCASM tag if it's sarcasm. Many people say outrageous, ludicrous things and mean them. (not sarcasm) --> Perhaps over 235% of the posters on DU! <-- see

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
7. Really?
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 10:58 AM
Dec 2014

O.K. if I need a sarcasm tag, when referrring to 235% of any group of people, then this place has truly gone through the looking glass.

The number in the context that I used it is a literal impossibility (cue the voter fraud conspiracists... ).

But in any case....I fixed it.

rock

(13,218 posts)
8. You mean you honestly
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 11:04 AM
Dec 2014

have never heard a sports coach say, "Give it 110%?" Now it's my turn, "Really?"

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
10. And in that context it is feasible.
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 12:47 PM
Dec 2014

In this context, without voter fraud it is not.

You really are only proving my point about the absurdity of this whole situation.

rock

(13,218 posts)
11. I do see your point
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 12:52 PM
Dec 2014

This is the moderators rules though. I don't agree with a lot of stuff they enforce, but we are stuck with it. To play the devil's advocate a bit more: one cannot tell tone in a post, so you have to explicitly indicate it. Stupid I know and I've been caught assuming everyone could tell I was being sarcastic fer gawds sakes!

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)
13. Every party needs a "primary challenge"!
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 01:02 PM
Dec 2014

It's bizarre that a "journalist" or "media outlet"
needs to make that NEWS, pfft.
When a party DOESN"T have a primary...that will be news

Polls are relative meaningless except to create
the public illusion of certainty or "authority".
Asking 1000 people what they think and then "weighting"
the results says little about reality.
But it CAN persuade people HOW to think about a topic.

So maybe it's propaganda?
Maybe The Washington Times needs or wants
to stir the pot? To what end?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
14. Which voters? I doubt Republicans are going to vote for her no matter how much of
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 08:25 PM
Dec 2014

War Hawk she is.

Independents are not likely either. And half the Dem voters want someone else.

I guess those polls are based on registered Dems which at this point makes up only 32% of the population.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Poll: Voters want a prim...