No, I'm not kidding here. It would seriously behoove us to do it, too.

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/IA-D#0312

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/iowa

Martin O'Malley had 763 precinct-level delegates. This was converted into 8 county-level delegates.

Now, in normal circumstances this wouldn't matter. In a primary, the votes would just be "wasted", and in a caucus even one percent apart, the realignment would be meaningless. However, Hillary and Bernie were separated by a mere FOUR county-level delegates. And in Iowa's caucus system, a series of conventions occur after the initial caucus, the first being March 12 (three days from now) at the county level.

Just like in precinct caucuses, a candidate under 15% is unviable, and their voters must realign. What does this mean? It means that O'Malley has eight delegates-at-large who can legitimately swing the "virtual tie" to give us the technical win as opposed to Hillary.

If his delegates split 6-2 in Bernie's favor, it results in a perfect tie. If they split 7-1 or 8-0, he wins Iowa "for real". Therefore, if we can convince them to mostly support Bernie before the next big round of votes (something I think we can pretty easily do after this huge Michigan upset), Bernie wins Iowa and makes the state race 11-10 instead of 12-9.

So I'm paging /u/Aidan_King into here, just in case. We need to contact Governor O'Malley and also reach out to each of his delegates-at-large if there's any remote way to track them down and make the case before they get to their respective county conventions and succumb to pressures from Clinton delegates. It would be a really good news headline - "Sanders Actually Won Iowa" - going into these next five states!

Edit: Here is the delegate spread for the candidates. We can triangulate O'Malley's support to the particular precincts that gave him county delegates and work back from there.