Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumWho here uses Facebook (and Google Drive)? Get in here please.
Do a search for "Bob Lamb democratic primaries" on Facebook. It should come right up with the search. Read his entire post regarding possible election fraud.. You will not be able to download the spreadsheet and you will not be able to magnify the spreadsheet so it is legible. You will have to download the spreadsheet yourself via Google Drive.
You will need to install Google Drive if you dont already have it. After you open the installed Google Drive program, type in the search bar: CBS Democratic Primaries(it will probably pop up after you type in CBS). It is a spreadsheet.
Will someone take a look at this document and give your impression of the validity of the numbers or possibility that what this document is alleging (and Bob Lamb) could possibly be true?
Thanks!
ETA......
https://www.change.org/p/fec-open-an-investigation-into-hillary-clinton-for-electronic-voter-fraud?recruiter=7653088&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=share_page&utm_term=des-lg-share_petition-no_msg&fb_ref=Default
Found this while wondering through people's comments on a Democratic affiliated fb page. DNC, DWS, Tim Canova can't remember.
Not saying some fishy is going on at all, it'd just be nice to know whether our election process has been internally compromised, or not.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I don't understand how or why he claims Iowa and Nevada were stolen. There is no exit poll data on those rows.
Also, there are quite some big discrepancies in states that Hillary was expected to win by a landslide.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)My motto is: "question everything" and at one time in my life I was too timid to speak up.
Not anymore since I've gotten older.
Thanks for looking and commenting.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)But it is also possible that exit poll sampling is consistently wrong in a way that undercounts Sanders support (due to picking the wrong precincts, asking the wrong voters etc), in multiple states. But I am not an expert so I wouldn't trust myself to sign off either way on this. Just something I will keep my eye on.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Our political environment doesn't exactly instill feelings of confidence nor competence so gut instincts come into play.
Thanks again for taking the time.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Bob Lamb on FB: ""Bob Lamb
2 hrs ·
Mounting evidence for election fraud costing Bernie in six states. Historically, exit polls have a 1% margin of error, unlike pre-election polls, which can be wildly off. When exit polls show a more than 1% difference from the final tabulated results, especially in states that use Diebolt electronic voting machines, then analysts consider it to be suspicious, in many cases, as in the 10.1% point variation in Ohio, extremely suspicious. The exit polls in the Republican voting have not shown that sort of deviation. But in the Democratic primaries, the deviation is often quite astonishing. one can only conclude fraud. But does anyone actually care?" Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/edit?usp=sharing
You just click on share and it's gives you a link you can use like above.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)Have Google Drive or want to install it. Probably worth the look for speculation. Although with caucuses its hard to know what went down. Maybe there's something there in the rest of it though, that needs attention.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I think that black box voting is an ongoing problem.
It would be interesting to study the #s from paper ballot states compared to those that e-vote.