Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:13 PM Mar 2016

Who here uses Facebook (and Google Drive)? Get in here please.

Do a search for "Bob Lamb democratic primaries" on Facebook. It should come right up with the search. Read his entire post regarding possible election fraud.. You will not be able to download the spreadsheet and you will not be able to magnify the spreadsheet so it is legible. You will have to download the spreadsheet yourself via Google Drive.

You will need to install Google Drive if you dont already have it. After you open the installed Google Drive program, type in the search bar: CBS Democratic Primaries(it will probably pop up after you type in CBS). It is a spreadsheet.

Will someone take a look at this document and give your impression of the validity of the numbers or possibility that what this document is alleging (and Bob Lamb) could possibly be true?

Thanks!

ETA......


https://www.change.org/p/fec-open-an-investigation-into-hillary-clinton-for-electronic-voter-fraud?recruiter=7653088&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=share_page&utm_term=des-lg-share_petition-no_msg&fb_ref=Default

Found this while wondering through people's comments on a Democratic affiliated fb page. DNC, DWS, Tim Canova can't remember.

Not saying some fishy is going on at all, it'd just be nice to know whether our election process has been internally compromised, or not.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who here uses Facebook (and Google Drive)? Get in here please. (Original Post) nc4bo Mar 2016 OP
Well without knowing anything else, JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #1
I don't know Jon, thats why I put it out there so others can take a look. nc4bo Mar 2016 #2
There could easily be something suspicious going on. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #3
Same here but I'm no #'s expert, not even in the least. nc4bo Mar 2016 #5
Bob Lamb - Spreadsheet bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #4
Thank you my friend! I could not pull that up, kept getting error messages. nt nc4bo Mar 2016 #6
K&R for those who know how to plow through numbers! KoKo Mar 2016 #7
I'm curious too. blackspade Mar 2016 #8

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
1. Well without knowing anything else,
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:24 PM
Mar 2016

I don't understand how or why he claims Iowa and Nevada were stolen. There is no exit poll data on those rows.

Also, there are quite some big discrepancies in states that Hillary was expected to win by a landslide.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
2. I don't know Jon, thats why I put it out there so others can take a look.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:27 PM
Mar 2016

My motto is: "question everything" and at one time in my life I was too timid to speak up.

Not anymore since I've gotten older.

Thanks for looking and commenting.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
3. There could easily be something suspicious going on.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:30 PM
Mar 2016

But it is also possible that exit poll sampling is consistently wrong in a way that undercounts Sanders support (due to picking the wrong precincts, asking the wrong voters etc), in multiple states. But I am not an expert so I wouldn't trust myself to sign off either way on this. Just something I will keep my eye on.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
5. Same here but I'm no #'s expert, not even in the least.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:39 PM
Mar 2016

Our political environment doesn't exactly instill feelings of confidence nor competence so gut instincts come into play.

Thanks again for taking the time.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
4. Bob Lamb - Spreadsheet
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:34 PM
Mar 2016

Bob Lamb on FB: ""Bob Lamb
2 hrs ·

Mounting evidence for election fraud costing Bernie in six states. Historically, exit polls have a 1% margin of error, unlike pre-election polls, which can be wildly off. When exit polls show a more than 1% difference from the final tabulated results, especially in states that use Diebolt electronic voting machines, then analysts consider it to be suspicious, in many cases, as in the 10.1% point variation in Ohio, extremely suspicious. The exit polls in the Republican voting have not shown that sort of deviation. But in the Democratic primaries, the deviation is often quite astonishing. one can only conclude fraud. But does anyone actually care?" Spreadsheet:



https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/edit?usp=sharing

You just click on share and it's gives you a link you can use like above.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
7. K&R for those who know how to plow through numbers!
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:42 PM
Mar 2016

Have Google Drive or want to install it. Probably worth the look for speculation. Although with caucuses its hard to know what went down. Maybe there's something there in the rest of it though, that needs attention.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
8. I'm curious too.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 12:10 AM
Mar 2016

I think that black box voting is an ongoing problem.

It would be interesting to study the #s from paper ballot states compared to those that e-vote.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Who here uses Facebook (a...