Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OAN loses its defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, will wind up paying her attorneys' fees. [View all]Nitram
(22,776 posts)59. Am I to understand that you think anything in the statement suggested padding a bill or cheating
a client? I'd appreciate any suggestion regarding redundant or unnecessary research someone found in the decision. To my mind, it was a perfect investigation and decision. I'd be very interested to hear concrete examples of why anyone opals think otherwise.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OAN loses its defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, will wind up paying her attorneys' fees. [View all]
kpete
May 2020
OP
OH dear. . .maybe the same thing could happen to their building that happened to the statue
niyad
May 2020
#35
Judge in San Diego rejects defamation complaint filed by OAN's parent company against Rachel Maddow
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2020
#11
That's gotta hurt. And judging by the incompetent "reporters" they hire, they have a small budget.
catbyte
May 2020
#33
It's Doctor Maddow. PhD in Political Science from Oxford. Dr. Maddow ain't no slouch.
Ninga
May 2020
#38
The pdf file at the link is a very interesting read. The explanation of how the claim of libel was
Nitram
May 2020
#53