|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:22 PM Original message |
What the Hell is SO WRONG with a WOMAN in the White House? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TallahasseeGrannie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. I hear you! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. You mean Hillary. Right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. They NEVER mean Boxer, do they? *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
81. No kidding... I'd support a Boxer ticket 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
76. I would mean someone with integrity, like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hey I have no beef with a woman in the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 10:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
55. I agree Clinton is too centrist...but I also dislike these legacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Extend a Hand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. wouldn't it be great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Yep Boxer for president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. Depends on what woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. Nothin. Don't listen to these fuckers. People are saying that they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPNotForMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. Margaret Thatcher wasn't all that in England. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. Belief in the superiority of one gender is the definition of sexism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Obviously, you are correct....but in all fairness...we should give them an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lindisfarne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. There's nothing wrong with a woman. Except she wouldn't get elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. Yup nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. We would all be too busy trashing her appearance and speculating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. I wasn't talking about Hillary, but if she turned out to be the winner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. NO WOMAN CAN WIN AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. I don't know about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. Its part of an evolutionary process towards bettering our Society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. No way do we have to live with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. I am really old now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. No, I can't tell you things have gotten better...only different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
82. I am not sure I like Emily's List too much, they are not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #82 |
98. I wouldn't limit myself to EMILY's list either. I just threw that out as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andromeda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
43. No, I don't accept that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
17. Oh my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. LOL, did ya notice??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
18. the bathroom off the oval office has 8 stand up urinals in a row .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Um....it Does? Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. honest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
44. Nothing a plumber can't rectify in a day or two.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
21. The Question was ...not if a woman can get elected, but if she could do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. Of course a woman could! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. If a woman can read, understand warnings...she be two steps ahead of BUSH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yeah! Go Barbara Boxer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. What's wrong with a Woman in the White House? Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cloister (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
25. Not defending his job with Katrina, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. No complaints except for misspent $30 million dollars which was given away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. While Brown wasn't there for Rita, his team was....sho nuff... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
30. It's a man's world... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Its all screwed up cause we got a GOOD SYSTEM but failed to put good fuel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
31. the problem is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. WORM ran France too until the FishMonger wives stormed the Bastille |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
34. nothing is wrong with it. I just don't want a woman that is a big ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. That goes without saying...the filter would make sure we got a good one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andromeda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
40. But, but, women have, you know,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:38 PM Response to Reply #40 |
85. Well that is why the invented braids. Women can hide their hair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
46. Nothing! Which one do you think we can get in there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrcheerful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
47. Right ideal, wrong time................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 07:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. We got plenty of Women out there on both sides of the aisle that wouild |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
49. Women are fine......just not Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
50. Boxer would be fine by me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
51. Never underestimate a man's ability to underestimate a woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 10:48 AM Response to Reply #51 |
59. LOL, I like that one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
52. Depends on the woman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 10:51 AM Response to Reply #52 |
60. I agree. Both are looking so much better than the Babbler. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddy Waters Guitar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
53. Boxer would be great, but we wouldn't attribute so much to gender |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 10:56 AM Response to Reply #53 |
61. Boxer looking good. ..History shows mixed reviews re women leaders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
54. Nothing is wrong with a woman in the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
56. Libby Dole? Kay Bailey Hutchison? Condi? Harriet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Of course not,,,they have to go thru the process...the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-05 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
57. Nothing, as long as it isn't Hillary . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #57 |
64. If Condi/Hutchinson/Hughes got the nom, I wouldn't vote for them too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
58. Look here Learn something from our current history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlGore-08.com (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
63. So Ann Coulter would make a perfect President just because she's female? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 11:10 AM Response to Reply #63 |
65. No one suggests we grab any woman off the street for the job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
66. Nothing, as long as the script, the acting, and the execution don't suck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 12:21 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Are we talking about the Status Quo??? LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. No, Commander-in-Chief. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:03 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Bush sez he has a Philosophy....I wonder about that....what kind?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
67. As long as it's the right woman, nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 12:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Someday, the search/filter will yeild a good one. A woman to lead us into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
72. A woman wouldn't.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. I would guess...Only if provoked.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
73. In reality, nothing. To the good ol' boys currently in charge, everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackthesprat (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
74. what evidence you have of gender determining behavior in politics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:55 PM Response to Reply #74 |
92. ??? Who said that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackthesprat (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. if your thesis is the biological, gender basis of war making, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. The vast majority of Aggression lies with MEN...not Women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackthesprat (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:31 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. confusing the fact that men have had the power, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
75. You mean like Margaret Thatcher? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FightinNewDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:27 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. No, Condi Rice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #78 |
89. I never proposed we get a woman soley on her sex to lead the Nation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #75 |
84. Margret was many things to different peeps....they all have pressures from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
77. This post is sexist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:33 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Exactly... I agree...and what is more sexist than having the ole boy club |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackthesprat (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:36 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. clarence thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. The filter broke down with partisan manuvering resulting in CT getting in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackthesprat (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. terrible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:40 PM Response to Reply #79 |
86. Yes, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:43 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Only if she convinces you during the primaries/filter....that she is the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. I don't need campaign rhetoric to influence me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 02:57 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. Then you become part of the de facto filter at the poll, vote against her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
95. You mean like Laura Bush? Don't scoff, it's been done before at the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 05:01 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. I don't think she could handle the job,,,she wouldn't make it past the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-05-05 10:50 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. She can't be any worse than Bushy. He is just a front anyway. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. The Nation would scoff at her even trying...IMOH anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Jun 06th 2024, 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC