|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:03 AM Original message |
Rasmussen- Iowa -Clinton 29% Edwards 25% Obama 24% Richardson 10% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. go EDWARDS!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
2. Richardson at 10%, not 18%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. In a race this close, how do you think the 800-pound gorilla of polling will affect things? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Edwards and Clinton do about the same with younger voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Kay, so is it possible that that might skew this somewhat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. There's been a lot of talk about that supposed bias. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Sure, but the number of cell-phone-only households only gets bigger every year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. It might not for quite a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. That is part of the reason why Zogby and other pollsters have embraced internet polling. It catches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Good question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. About as much as they did in 2006 and in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
8. I'll be Iowa on Saturday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Dubuque is a good place to go for that - I think every candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
11. Wow its a literal dead heat amongst what Ras defines as certain caucus goers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The big key is who will get unexpected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. That would give me some hope for Obama or Edwards. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I think Obama has much more appeal amongst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
15. Who will the caucus goers trend to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Please remember that non-viable candidates can group together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
18. Obama and Edwards should form a ticket before primaries. Clinton would be toast. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-15-07 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
20. Never thought I'd say this, but I'm starting to think Edwards will win Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC