|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:41 PM Original message |
MSNBC: Obama's Meeting with Edwards is Off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. ut oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Obama probably does not want to make any deals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. well, Obama was supposed to meet with him, but called it off at the last minute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Also...I wondered how Obama was going to fit a visit to NC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
88. BINGO!!! Hillary already said JE would be a part of anything she does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
springhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 03:02 AM Response to Reply #88 |
127. You have absolutely no idea............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debatepro (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
122. IT WILL BE RESCHEDULED!!!... Site after jump |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debatepro (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
123. OBAMA: "It will be rescheduled. We're gonna make it happen." Media is the cause of the delay!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Any info on who called it off? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. had to be Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. he rebuffed Edwards once already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. No he didn't, so stop spreading lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. 'no evidence to suggest it was true' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. If true, I don't think that would be smart on Obama's part. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. not the first time Obama snuffed Edwards! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
31. Oh please...You don't even know what happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. Heres to hoping John Shows up at the College Park Rally and endorses him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. do not count on that!! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
13. I personally don't think Obama needs to grovel or make deals. JMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
49. God forbid Obama lower himself to make concessions with the lowly John Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
76. He is. Remember him belitting Edwards in the SC debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
14. rut roh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. I didn't think it possible but you made me laugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeforChange (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. Maybe he just needs a day off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. Why should Obama have to travel to NC to grovel to Edwards on the eve of a primary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Edwards is a "special interest" now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. He's a good one, but yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I wouldn't describe one man as a "special interest" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. But... but I thought he was supposed to be the uniter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. No one said he can't work with Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. Oh No - sounds like another George Bush.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #45 |
62. I've been getting a lot of deja vu lately.... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
60. I guess that only applies to working with Republicans. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
41. I hope this is the case. I hope Obama was rude and arrogant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
77. Except the nuke industry, the drug/health insurance industry, "free trade" corporate interests, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demokatgurrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
99. Yeah, right. dream on. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demokatgurrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
100. Yeah, right. dream on. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. Probably because he is campaigning today - 3 states votes tomorrow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
56. But wouldn't they just say "scheduling conflict" was the cause of the meeting being cancelled? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #56 |
78. Or less - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #78 |
108. Evidently, it was a scheduling conflict. There was a post here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #56 |
110. It was a scheduling conflict - From NBC's Mark Murray: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #110 |
121. Wow! This post is buried, IndyOP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
21. Edwards for Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. I heard that. I also heard that Edwards is deciding based on who's more electable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Won't you feel silly if he endorses Obama? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. No. I EXPECT him to endorse Obama. If he doesn't, it's obvious he's an opportunist. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. So, if he endorses your candidate, no props, if he endorses the other candidate, death! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. A little dramatic, don't ya think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #57 |
69. Edwards probably promised both of them he would meet with both of them before making a decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. "Probably" is your opinion. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #73 |
81. and I have seen nothing to contridict it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. How about the report that Hillary SECRETLY met with Edwards Friday? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. the meeting with Obama was supposed to be secret too, but someone leaked it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Where did you hear that reported? Or are you just making it up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. everything regarding this meeting has been from unnamed sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. So "probably" IS your opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. and I have seen nothing to contridict it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. delete-dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #97 |
103. We've already been through this. It's all based on your assumptions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #91 |
109. just to give evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
82. That was in a campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #82 |
89. Of COURSE! Hillary would NOT bring change which is obvious by the facts that she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #50 |
80. Compare that to the class of Hillary supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #80 |
107. HAHAHAHAHA!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. I really don't think that's the point. Honestly. Its not about who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. I agree. And MSNBC just reported that when asked why, the Obama camp said to contact the Edwards' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. That makes me suspect Edwards will endorse Clinton, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
58. You're probably right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
59. That makes some sense, actually, altho I don't know why it was announced earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 02:11 AM Response to Reply #59 |
124. My guess is that Edwards hadn't decided who to endorse when the meetings were set up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
75. I think that would deeply disappoint many Edwards supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. What about his positions on health care and even trade (which are closer to Hillary)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #75 |
85. Follow the money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #40 |
55. But he said something similar before Sen Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Yeah, but that was about an endorsement...not about something that changed, possibly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClericJohnPreston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #61 |
101. "Because Obama refused to pander to him" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #101 |
120. Talk about having amnesia, ClericJohnPreston... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. But we don't really know what is going on, do we? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
63. This is a glimpse of what we can expect if Edwards endorses Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Who said it would be because he dared not to hope? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #63 |
113. Or if he endorses Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 02:14 AM Response to Reply #63 |
126. Agreed 100%. Unbelievable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
26. Maybe they're not HAVING a meeting because they don't NEED to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
27. If John is endorsing on principle, he can only endorse Obama. If Hillary, it will be for a plum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. So Edwards is Zell Miller if he endorses Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az_lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
74. Couldn't agree more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #74 |
84. Edwards knows the data, not the sloganeering and Axlerod image making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #84 |
112. Yes I do and it was the employees of those companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
29. I would prefer all our Democrats were willing to speak with and meet each other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
36. Thanks, John.. we'll be glad to have you on the winning team! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stellanoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
38. I've been floored by how both of our candidates have managed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
43. i wasn't really listening but i was watching msnbc and i heard the word 'scheduling conflict' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. The thing that makes me suspicious is that Obama camp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. here is a full statement from MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. One remarkable thing about the Obama camp - they do not leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. now that sounds like Edwards will endorse Obama on Wednesday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #46 |
65. doesn't sound good.... for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
47. Strategically speaking, it's better is JRE waits until early March |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
51. It's possible Edwards decided to endorse Obama without having to meet on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
54. He doesn't have to get snippy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marlakay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
66. Clinton camp threatening Edwards?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. You seriously heard this on MSNBC? I find that hard to believe, even from the locker room network ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marlakay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #68 |
104. No I said i heard it in a comment in a msnbc blog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #104 |
114. I would not believe a blog - anyone can post to a blog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cd3dem (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #66 |
87. how low can low get? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
67. I will not jump to any conclusions or presume to know the intentions of John Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fadedrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
70. Between a Rock and Hard Place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COFoothills (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
71. Obama is going to be very busy tonight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COFoothills (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
72. WHOOPS...DUPLICATE POST n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
79. it's going to be rescheduled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #79 |
92. Your right - link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
miceelf (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
93. scheduling conflict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClericJohnPreston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
95. BINGO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. And IF Edwards does endorse Obama, then what will you do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:18 PM Response to Reply #95 |
118. That's EXACTLY how this Edwards supporter feels too. John sees right through the facade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark Twain Girl (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
105. As an Edwards supporter, I've processed this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
106. i thought it was reported to be happening now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
111. Am I alone in thinking that Edwards' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #111 |
117. No. You are not alone. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #111 |
119. I would tend to disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 02:13 AM Response to Reply #111 |
125. Edwards will endorse Hillary before TX and OH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 03:19 AM Response to Reply #111 |
128. I agree but so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
115. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
116. Oooooh....that doesn't sound too good for the Obama man! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 08th 2024, 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC