|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:16 PM Original message |
How much time to give Leopold's scoop? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. It took me about three minutes to read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. It's a troubling development. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. One week from today - and then I fold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. How is it not still a scoop? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
36. If you reported that the indictment already occurred (past tense), and it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:37 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Hahaha! Ok, whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. Here's something which I consider bad news: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. The air is leaking out . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. I read earlier today on Talk Left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texasleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. time's up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. OH.GOOD.GOD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. Give me a Break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Did you read where TO confirmed details between sources? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 11:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
52. Please don't take this as an insult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. 24 hours!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevendsmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Yeah, how ridiculous was that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. time alone, time will tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. It's Tuesday afternoon. In a 24 hour news cycle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I'm not quite sure why everyone assumes Leopold was wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Remember Leopold's "Target Letter" scoop? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevendsmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. We're desperate to believe that Rove will be indicted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I actually think he WILL be indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. I agree! This from TO today... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
17. give it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
19. If it turns out that there was a sealed indictment, dating to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deansyawp (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Yes, the only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. I'm with you on the "fishy" details. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
20. Wow. The Leopold-Haters Club must be on a membership drive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
40. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
43. Is Leopold paying you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:33 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
44. Why is it hateful to wonder if someone's story is accurate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. I'm more focused on Rove being indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. yep - we are all on the same team |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnarchoFreeThinker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
27. I don't know. We better be on the safe side and panic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
29. From TO..... TODAY!!! "The story is accurate..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Now I'd like them to go back to those sources and ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. A secret indictment? Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
30. it depends on rove's business hours. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Balbus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
37. Today's 24 hours isn't your daddy's 24 hours... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
39. Until when I wake up tomorrow, that's it!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
41. Rove's 24 is up and so is Jason's 15 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
42. Until It Is Proven Right Or Wrong, One Way Or The Other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
45. If the indictment papers aren't dated May 12 or before, then he was wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
46. Leopold reported Rove was indicted Friday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:13 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Did you compile that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:19 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. no, the list of past Leopold stories claiming Rove would be indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I haven't seen it posted at DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
51. 9 more minutes...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 08th 2024, 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC