|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 01:17 AM Original message |
The Newsweek cover. Sarah commented on the sexist picture but did she talk about the wording? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. Did she think it was sexist when she posed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 10:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. That was my immediate thought too. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 07:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. That is what I was thinking....what a tweet falin is...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. That picture was on the cover of a runners' magazine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. +1 Seriously, she probably doesn't know the difference between Newsweek and a runners' mag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. She really doesn't have any right to complain about the picture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. She's asking to be taken seriously as a leading politician . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Those Legs Don't Run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juno jones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 05:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. And those legs look even worse in another pic from the series. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
5. That was the first thing I thought about too: the wording. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 07:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. and it's not like Newsweek asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Quoting from a bible, of course (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 11:07 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. ha ha....seems like you and I are the only ones who paid attention to the wording |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
10. On close examination the headline is actually pretty flattering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. It IS sexist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Ah, coming to Sarah Palin's defense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. I'm a feminist, I'll defend any woman who is attacked on sexist terms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hileeopnyn8d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
33. This coming from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. No, I wouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. It's no worse than the photo of a shirtless Obama coming out of the surf in Hawaii |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 07:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Yep, but those rags were not a news magazine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 08:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. It was on the cover of the Washingtonian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 08:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Two wrongs don't make a right, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. She posed for the picture -- and the look you have a problem with was deliberate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:44 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. There's only one side here--and it's money and profit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. Ok, but here's the thing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. Nobody had read the cover to her yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. Because she wants to be the eternal wah wah victim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. That cover is so offensive to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
36. good point the flag should not be nearly touching the ground! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sohndrsmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. Personally, I don't think I'd complain about being on the cover of Newsweek, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-18-09 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. She probably loves being considered a problem - makes her feel important. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
31. She allowed flag desecration while she POSED for the "sexist" picture in RunnersWorld Mag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyBoots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:40 AM Original message |
The wording is a play on "How do you solve a problem like Maria" from The Sound of Music. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
32. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
34. She posed like that - why would she be upset? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC