You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: bit of both [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. bit of both
the reversal of the bugman rule suggests that yes, the fix is in.

But don't you think if they could pass the other rule (and exlude themselves from future embarassment) that they would? Of course they would. The boundaries for them are much further out than they have been in my lifetime (what they can get away with without expecting any backlash) - but were there no bounds they would have gone forward as planned.... maybe backtracked on the DeLay rule (due to a fix being in) but giving each of themselves cover...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC