You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: You make some good points, but... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. You make some good points, but...
when you start allowing exemptions or deductions, you then have to start defining things like "charitable organization" (would that be like the Anti-Clinton Library, for example... It is a tax-free organization after all). I understand what you mean about likelihood of reducing charitable contributions, and can feel sympathy for the organizations. I give regularly, without regard to if it is deductable or not, based on if I feel the organizatino is a good and worthy cause. I wish more folks did/could.

As for tooling and incentives, I don't know if I understand what you mean by incentives, but tooling (as in revamping a factory line) could be allowed for in the definition of income (as in "profits - some forms of business expenditures such as retooling a line or retraining employees"). I know it isn't a panacea, but it has benefits in the simplicity areas that could more than compensate for the losses. The big thing is that the tax code is far too complex (I have to spend about 4 x 8 hour days filing out my forms, and I do it electronically), and allows for far too many "pork exemptions" and a flat tax would help that dramatically.

And yes, I did mean for a family of four (I have such a one, so tend to notice facts for IT, not for larger/smaller ones). My bad.


Of course, there are some other things we could do, like take back the shelters that allow corporations to transfer profits to over-seas divisions and exclude them as taxable income, etc., but the big thing is that as people get wealtier, they ease of finding shelters to protect their income and their ability to take advantage of those shelters increases dramatically. Add to that the give-aways (like being able to claim stock-value losses) and it gets even worse. The fact is that someone making $30K can afford $3K in taxes (no, it isn't CONVENIENT, but it can be done), while someone making $100K can easily tolerate $10K with no significant damage to their lifestyle, and so on, but that isn't what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC