You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: I think the machines worked very well for the most part. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think the machines worked very well for the most part.
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 11:49 AM by Virginian
The process went smoothly, the results were talleyed faster at the precinct level.
The problem seemed to be communicating the results to election headquarters. First, there was a problem when everyone tried to transfer the results to a central machine (computer talking to computer) by telephone modem. I don't know if everyone finished faster and tried to access the central computer at the same time or what. Most of the precincts ended up reverting to the method used in previous years, a person talking to a person to transfer the information. I think the county had to scramble people to answer the phones because that job wasn't going to be necessary with the new automation.
It is better to get the problems worked out this year than next year.

The other issue was the Republican party workers. They seemed to be lurking all day with a mad expression. They seemed like they were looking for anything to build into an issue.
The news hasn't mentioned where the nine machines were or what problems they encountered, but the votes on those machines could not have been in significant numbers and can easily be isolated from the rest of the votes. This story says the machines were put back into service, other stories have said they were not put back into service, but returned to the precinct so that the votes they contained could be counted in the precinct tally at the end of the day.

I am wondering about the numbers of machine failures. Were there a total of nine machines that failed during the day or a total of nine that were removed and returned to the precinct?

The Republicans are probably right that legally the machines should have been repaired at the polls, and not removed from the polling place. Repairing them and testing the repair may have been impossible in the polling place. Maybe the removable storage device should have been locked up at the polling place until the machine was returned, that way the votes would have remained at the polls. The votes can be in question, but not the election as the winners are the same with or without those votes.

(on edit to make clear who had the sour faces)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC