32. Very slanted article. Cuts the administration too much slack.
I'm set to wondering if Karl Rove had a play in the publication of this one. It tip-toes around the issues and seems to excuse the Bush administration from their excesses and crimes. Quite sickening... Ashcroft's role is glossed over and I have to wonder what he found so reprehensible that he felt it necessary to back up Comey. Furthermore, and perhaps even more importantly, what did Comey find so nefarious that he originally opposed and what turned him? These are the questions that the article should have tried to answer more in depth. I think we're witnessing not only the most criminal administration to inhabit the White House but the most dangerous.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
