You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush, Blair Say Iraq War Is Not Cause of Attacks [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 04:34 AM
Original message
Bush, Blair Say Iraq War Is Not Cause of Attacks
Advertisements [?]
Bush, Blair Say Iraq War Is Not Cause of Attacks
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1827-2003Nov20.html
By Dana Milbank and Glenn Frankel
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, November 21, 2003; Page A01

LONDON, Nov. 20 -- President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair declared Thursday that the invasion of Iraq was not to blame for the recent wave of terrorist violence and that the bombs that devastated two British facilities in Turkey proved the need to press ahead with the military campaign.

"Our mission in Iraq is noble and it is necessary, and no act of thugs or killers will change our resolve or alter their fate," Bush said at a joint news conference with Blair, as tens of thousands of demonstrators gathered on the city's streets to protest the Iraq war. "We will finish the job we have begun."

---snip---

Blair echoed Bush's remarks, calling for attacking terrorists "wherever and whenever we can."

Bush raised the possibility of increasing the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. When a reporter mentioned the United States' announced plans to reduce troop levels, the president responded: "We could have less troops in Iraq, we could have the same number of troops in Iraq, we could have more troops in Iraq -- whatever is necessary to secure Iraq."

A top aide to Bush, who briefed reporters after the news conference on condition that she not be identified, said that Bush was not announcing a change in policy and that expectations remained that troop levels would be reduced. "There is simply nothing to suggest that the number of American forces would need to increase," the official said. "In fact, the conversations with the commanders have gone the other way."

----snip----> Clinton-fault-alert <----

Britain's foreign secretary, Jack Straw, responded earlier Thursday to critics who have questioned the effectiveness of the war in Iraq, saying he believed it had diminished the threat of terrorism. He also was critical of Bush's predecessor. "What people have got to remember is that September 11th happened in 2001 and not in 2003," Straw said. "It was planned under the presidency of Bill Clinton."

-----snip----

Bush, who struck a defiant tone throughout the news conference, produced what appeared to be glances of surprise from Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and the White House national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, when he rejected a question's premise that he planned to reduce troops in Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC