I don't seriously think he could've done anything, but I read Greenwald's blog post (edit:
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/) on this and it's hard not to see his point - Emanuel was pressed as to whether or not he was aware of the e-mails, and he still denied it. That was false. He was aware of them but had not seen them. Truthiness above truth.
I find that issue wholly separate about having a realistic shot at doing something about this without stronger evidence. Like I said earlier in this thread, the difference is, it wasn't Rahm's job. The people whose job it was, didn't do the job, disgustingly so.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
