Reply #34: The Old World Order [View All]

This conspiracy to establish oligarchy as the foundation of a "new" Constitution was the result of the robber barons being restricted with regard to monopolization at the turn of the 20th Century and of all the families hurt most it was the Rockefeller family that planted the seeds and watered the garden so to speak. Samuel Bush ingratiated himself to the Rockefellers and ran an empire few knew about from Columbus and he mentored not only his son Prescott but many others in the ideology of fascism as the ideal of federalism as well as the ideology of oligarchy, and the Rockefellers of course funded it all including the promotion of eugenics which of course tied them into the ideology of the Nazis who Prescott Bush funded using the Harriman money. And where we are now is where we were then. The dynasty of the Bushes. The vision of Samuel Bush.

When Eisenhower warned us of the dangers of the military-industrial complex, he was warning us about the Bushes and those who supported the same vision of oligarchy as the Bushes. One need only read that warning to realize what, and who, was behind the assassination of John F. Kennedy who understood the warning and who represented a threat to the military-industrial complex and to Halliburton in particular which of course enriched itself off the Vietnam War as well as the current "war" which is not really a war at all but rather a colonization of a sovereign nation. That of course was really the aim of the Johnson policy in Vietnam. It was not the policy of Kennedy.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/vietnam.htm

While Kennedy did not represent a threat per se, he did. Halliburton had already discovered the lucrative nature of war. Particularly war that could be created and managed and administered.

When you really look at our history during the course of the 20th Century you begin to understand the fallacy of political parties and in the reality of there now being only one party.

The Republicans let go of their party. The Democrats seem unwilling to do so. That defines best the difference between Democrats and Republicans at this point.