Reply #5: The evidence against her was actually very strong which is why [View All]

she was convicted. Having read some of the evidence against her, mostly her own testimony regarding her activities that night, her inability to say where she was and her ever-changing stories, not to mention her own statements, written when she was alone, not in the presence of the police, in which she falsely accused an innocent man for the second time and claimed she witnessed the crime, it is hardly in doubt that she participated in the crime. She laughed when asked if she owed that man, whose life and business she destroyed, an apology.

I don't have any doubt that she was involved in the crime. I can't say what exact role she played, but at the very least it was clear that she was there from the evidence.