You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Ashcroft is not a qualified jurist for the Supreme Court
[View All]
ClevelandSportsCurse
(240 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-09-04 06:11 PM
Original message |
| Ashcroft is not a qualified jurist for the Supreme Court |
|
Not just from an ideological standpoint - we all know what his views are - but from a legal professional standpoint. He has no judgeship experience whatsoever. Usually, Supreme Court nominees are those who have some significant experience on the bench - whether it be at a state supreme court level or US Circuit Court of Appeals level. Ashcroft has been a politician all of his life. He may possess a law degree, but putting ideology aside, he is NOT a qualified jurist for the Supreme Court.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread