evolution does not explain the origin of the universe [View All]

While evolution is a credible scientific theory, it's range is limited, and some of the controversy about evolution is more about extending its range beyond its limits. Evolution does not explain the origin of the universe; evolution does not explain how life comes from non-life; nor does it, title to the contrary, explain the origin of species. All it says is that given an already existing species (that is, a group of animals that can reproduce with each other), some of the offspring will have variations which give them a better chance for survival. These offspring will then produce offspring with similar traits.

And the theory stops there.

There is no evidence that after a certain amount of variations, a new species is born, that is, an offspring which cannot reproduce with relatives of its parents. The theory begins after the species has come into existance.

Therefore, Intelligent Design, as much as it is maligned, seems just as good a hypothesis for those things which evolution does not cover--i.e., the origin of the universe, the origin of life, and, with the addition of the "anthropic principle," a phenomenon widely discussed by such authors as Paul Davies, the apparent calibration of the universe to produce consciousness.

I, a lifelong Democrat, liberal, and Christian, see Intelligent Design, as a basis for my most cherished values--because I believe the universe is created, I believe we are stewards of creation--therefore I oppose such things as drilling in Alaska, and I affirm environmental protection. My basis for these values may be different from my fellow Democrats, but there is no reason to malign me or my position, since I come out on your side.

Where we differ is that I don't mind the discussion of Intelligent Design as part of education--you can talk about Newton, Jefferson, Aristotle, Kant, Einstein, and any number of great thinkers who share this belief. I suspect that the Methodist Hillary Clinton believes in some form of Intelligent Design--so why be afraid of discussing it? It might be a way to talk about Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Native American beliefs, Wicca, as well as Christianity and how there are different approaches to the very philosophical question, "Why not nothing?"

I would prefer no flames. Again, my goal is to open up the Democratic party to a wider diversity of opinions.