You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Rush Limbaugh’s assets be seized…? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 10:23 AM
Original message
Should Rush Limbaugh’s assets be seized…?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 10:30 AM by KansDem
I personally don’t like the “Seizure and Forfeiture” act as I believe it establishes guilt before the trial, but since it is being used to “combat” illegal drug use in the War on Drugs (as well as non-drug related offenses), why hasn’t Limbaugh’s assets been seized?

As I recall, this was supposed to freeze the assets of a suspected drug dealer so that person couldn’t use his wealth to hire a “good” lawyer, however, haven't we all read/heard stories about this action being taken for simple possession?

http://www.onlinepot.org/legal/fedforfit.htm

(snip)
II. GENERAL EMPHASIS ABOUT SEIZURES

A. Civil not criminal proof of evidence
1. Civil - Preponderance (Tip Scales)
2. Criminal - beyond reasonable doubt

B. Seize and receipt money for investigation
C. Individual does not have to charged, arrested, or found guilty (much less P/C to keep money than convict person)
D. Can seize money with little probable cause or suspicion to investigate further
E. May be narcotic money, gambling money, or just stolen (large sums of money are just suspicious)
F. Basically who carries large sums of cash legitimately ($65,000 case)

III. TYPES OF SEIZURES
A. ADMINISTRATIVE - Handled internally by DEA (3 to 6 month turn around with no challenges)

B. JUDICIAL - Handled by U. S. District Courts by U. S. Attorney
1. Much longer turn around
2. Anyone can file cost bond to force administrative into judicial forfeiture
3. Over $100,000 must go judicial
4. Real property must go judicial

C. YOU ARE PRIMARILY CONCERNED WITH VEHICLES AND MONEY
1. VEHICLES - Can be seized for:
a. Transport illegal controlled substances
i. No threshold amounts of seizure
ii. 2 grams coke
iii. 2 Thai sticks
iv. Roach in ashtray (butt)
b. Purchased with drug proceeds
c. Utilized to facilitate drug transaction

2. MONEY
a. Drug proceeds
b. Utilized to purchase drugs
(more...)

So, how does Rush NOT fit into the “Seizure and Forfeiture” guidelines??? :shrug:

On Edit: Isn't Rush a Multi-Millionaire???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC