You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: here are some quotes......how close can they cut it? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. here are some quotes......how close can they cut it?
Last October, a reporter put this to Ari Fleischer: “Ari, the president has been saying that the threat from Iraq is imminent, that we have to act now to disarm the country of its weapons of mass destruction, and that it has to allow the U.N. inspectors in, unfettered, no conditions, so forth.”

Fleischer’s answer? “Yes.”

...........

In January, Wolf Blitzer asked Dan Bartlett: “Is an imminent threat to U.S. interests, either in that part of the world or to Americans right here at home.”

Bartlett’s answer? “Well, of course he is.”

..........

A month after the war, another reporter asked Fleischer, “Well, we went to war, didn’t we, to find these — because we said that these weapons were a direct and imminent threat to the United States? Isn’t that true?”

Fleischer’s answer? “Absolutely.”

.........

“What we must not do in the face of a mortal threat is give in to wishful thinking or willful blindness.” Dick Cheney (August, 2002)


from Josh Marshall/The Hill cache
http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:rXcecjP5-UcJ:www.hillnews.com/marshall/110503.aspx++bush+called+Iraq+imminent+threat&hl=en&start=2&ie=UTF-8

from the above link, Marshall does a good job of demonstrating what junta apologists are up to:

“No member of the administration,” conservative commentator Andrew Sullivan recently wrote, “used the term ‘imminent threat’ to describe Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. No one. … Clark is repeating a lie that has been thoroughly exposed on the Internet and elsewhere, a lie that even The New York Times has stopped repeating.”
......

Critics like Sullivan want to put the onus on Democrats to untangle these silly word games if they want to talk about what we all know happened in the run-up to the war. But that’s just not how it works. Just as they can’t undo what they did, the White House and its supporters can’t undo what they said. There’s no use denying it. It was only a year ago. We were there. We remember.


Also.....I'm sure I saw a link here somewhere, too, that referenced monkeyboy actually using the word imminent WRT Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC