Reply #23: The "what happened to the wmd" segment was pretty weak [View All]

The allegations Hussein Kamel made is common knowledge here at DU, but the mainstream media seems willfully ignorant on the subject. The narrative that the Kamel testimony supports is quite plausible, and there is no reason the American public shouldn't at least be able make up their own minds on its validity.

Americans right now are only aware of three possible explanation for the WMD question:
The weapons are either still hidden,
they were sent across the border with terrorists,
or they destroyed right before the war.

This is a primary reason why they still support the rationale for war.
They believe that the Iraq "crisis" started because of the confirmed existence of Iraq's WMD.
They do not know that the WMD's were destroyed before bush was even appointed.
They are unaware of the PNAC and its agenda.
And thus, they are still unaware that most of the "intelligence" reported to them was based on outright blatant lies.


(Reposted from LBN due to locked thread. oops :shrug: )