You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Yes, at least the ones in Iraq, and probably the ones in [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, at least the ones in Iraq, and probably the ones in
Afghanistan because of the incompentence of the administration to remove resources from Afghanistan to Iraq. Because of what this administration did, by shifting resources from Afghanistan to Iraq, both are in shambles...

I cannot believe that 50% of the idiots still would like to re-elect him for his failure...

I will add one more thing, the 60000 plus we lost in Viet Nam was also in vain. We have learned NOTHING from that experience...

5 years from now no one will remember or care who died expect immediate family members...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC