You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Great answer, KT2000 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Great answer, KT2000
Great answer to a very interesting and extremely important question. I would add that it is worth-while to go beyond googling, and to invest the time to read as many of the dozens of high-quality books about this subject as possible.

One might do well to start with any of the books that deal with the infamous Hoover memo from early 1968, which read , in part, that the FBI had to: "prevent the coalition of militant black nationalist groups .... prevent militant black nationalist groups and leaders from gaining respectability ... Prevent the rise of a black 'messiah' who would unify and electrify, the militant black nationalist movement. Malcomb X (sic) might have been such a 'messiah;' he is the martyr of the movement today. Martin Luther King, Stokely Carmichael and Elija Muhammed (sic) all aspire to this position. Elija Muhammed is less of a threat because of his age. King could be a very real contender for this position should he abandon his supposed 'obedience' to 'white, liberal doctrines' {nonviolence} and embrace nationalism. Carmichael has the necessay charisma to be a real threat in this way."

I think that it is important to first have an understanding of both Malcolm and Martin, and who they really were .... including how the black population viewed them, and the white population, and the international community.

One thing you'll find is that, much like in the days of the "Red Scare" and the McCarthy era, the FBI under Hoover was almost entirely focused on being the political police .... and a #1 tactic was to use informants to not only eport back on activities, but to disrupt. I'm tempted to add a segment on the use of sociopaths rather than mere "anti-social" informants, as anti-social people have a code of conduct they adhere to. While it is not the "main stream" code, it has a sense of honor. Sociopaths do not.

An interesting book that is used at Syracuse University is "Agents of Repression" by Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall. It covers the FBI's "secret wars" against the Black Panther Party and American Indian Movement. While there are many other extremely good books, this one is a good start. Also of interest is "Malcolm X : The FBI File" by C. Carson, with an introduction by Spike Lee that is worth the price of the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC