You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #128: This does not look like a scientific paper to me [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

Xipe Totec

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Dec-05-04 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #123

128. This does not look like a scientific paper to me

If it was, it would be accessible as a scientific paper through Stanford University, or be published in a science magazine somewhere. It seems to be standing alone with no reference to earlier work BY OTHER SCIENTISTS, and with no other scientific papers referencing it either. Therefore it has not been subject to peer review and does not qualify as a scientific paper regardless of Professor Tiller's claimed honorifics.

A professor emeritus at a university would have published papers numbering in the hundreds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.