Democratic Underground - It's pretty clearly unconstitutional, IMO.

Reply #5: It's pretty clearly unconstitutional, IMO. [View All]

goobergunch

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-09-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. It's pretty clearly unconstitutional, IMO.

Amendment XXII (to the Constitution)

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxxii.html

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Reply #5: It's pretty clearly unconstitutional, IMO. [View All]