You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A few facts about the school that "banned the Declaration" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:03 AM
Original message
A few facts about the school that "banned the Declaration"
Advertisements [?]
When are the fundys going to actually tell the *GASP* truth about that asinine lawsuit they have going against the school they lie about?

School-religion spotlight on Cupertino

TEACHER SUES DISTRICT OVER BAN ON MATERIALS, SPURS E-MAIL FLOOD

By Connie Skipitares and Maya Suryaraman

Fox News is in town today. Tomorrow, it's "Good Morning America." Conservative America is up in arms. And Cupertino is squarely in the spotlight.

Attracting all the attention is a public school teacher's lessons on colonial history -- religion-laced looks at documents written by some of the Founding Fathers.

(snip)

A press release from the school district said:

"The district has not violated anyone's constitutional rights. Media coverage regarding the lawsuit has substantially mischaracterized the content of the Cupertino Union School District's curriculum. It has incorrectly been reported that the district has banned the teaching of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. In reality, no such ban exists."

Lorence said he believes the district was responding to a single parent's complaint. Williams, he said, has been teaching colonial history with the same materials for seven years without incident. Last year, a parent complained when Williams brought religious-based materials to elaborate on a class discussion about the inclusion of "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. After that, all of Williams' teaching materials came under scrutiny by Vidmar, the lawyer said.

But if there is support for Williams in this school community of upscale ranch-style homes, it wasn't readily apparent Tuesday.

In the principal's office, a small round conference table brimmed with flowers, a huge Toblerone chocolate bar, stacks of cards and valentines from the children in one classroom, all expressing support for the embattled principal.

And a few blocks from the school, a home festooned with Christmas lights also sported a home-made lawn sign proclaiming, "Keep Religion out of Public Schools."

"If I want my kids going to church, I'll take them," said Nathalie Schuler of her lawn sign.

Schuler said she is requesting that her daughter not be placed in Williams' class next year.

"They're alienating those of us who are not as fundamentalist," Schuler said.

Several parents said that Williams' fervent Christian beliefs had been a topic of concern and conversation among parents at the school well before the lawsuit.

"Mr. Williams discusses his Christianity in the classroom," said Dorothy Pickler, who has two children at Stevens Creek. "He slants lessons in that direction. Parents have complained."

Armineh Noravian, whose son had Williams last year, said that the teacher wore a Jesus ring, a cross near the collar of his shirt and talked to his students often about his Bible study classes.

Noravian said that when Williams sent his students home with a proclamation for national prayer day from President Bush, she and other parents complained to the principal.

"The class was studying George Washington at the time," Noravian said. "It had nothing to do with George W. Bush or the proclamation of prayer."

Noravian said that Williams' discussion of his Christian faith troubled her because Stevens Creek is a diverse school with many Jewish, Hindu and other non-Christian students.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/10365917.htm

The two sons of bitches bringing the lawsuit:

Williams himself, doesn't he looked spaced out?



And his legal flack, Jordan Lawrence, who looks like your typical fundy liar:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC